YOUR FEEDBACK
Adobe Flex 2 - Answering Tough Questions About Enterprise Development
A Correct Person wrote: Denis Roebrt commented on the 21 Aug 2006 "Tough Que...

SYS-CON.TV
TOP MICROSOFT .NET LINKS


Converting VB6 to VB.NET, Part I
A Look at Your Options and When to Use Them

Digg This!

Page 2 of 3   « previous page   next page »

If the VB6 program has variable names that match keywords in VB.NET, they'll be converted with '_renamed' appended to the declaration. The wizard doesn't always find where the variable is used, so the best option is to change the variable name before the conversion.

Don't bother with formatting code in the pre-conversion stage - the converter will do its own formatting during the conversion.

Well-Written Code Converts Well
I was around when Borland and then Microsoft released C++ compilers, and I was responsible for converting a lot of C code to C++. One lesson I learned was that well-written code converted far easier than poorly written code. So, the first task of a conversion effort should to clean up and simplify the original code. The following checklist contains some of the pre-conversion steps that will make the conversion easier - I will be covering all of these.

  1. Declare all variables.
  2. Give all variables explicit type, not variants.
  3. Do not worry about code formatting.
  4. Do not use 0 to disable timer, set enable = false instead (vb6 default is 0, enabled).
  5. Can't be perfect (bring to front).
  6. Do an internal test and release of a clean VB version before the final conversion.
  7. Declare only one variable per line.
  8. Remove dead code.
  9. Set the startup object to a form.
  10. Make sure the code compile. and runs before the conversion.
  11. Convert all arrays to 0 based.
  12. Remove all "as any."
  13. Convert VB1 - VB5 to VB6 first.
  14. Convert DAO and RDO to ADO.
  15. Do not use defaults when accessing control properties.
  16. Rename any VB.NET keywords in the VB6 code.
When I was doing the C to C++ conversions, one key quality indicator that I looked for was function prototypes. In C, prototypes were optional (and didn't even exist in the early days of C!). In C++, prototypes are mandatory. When I saw C code with prototypes, the conversion typically went well; when they were missing, other issues often came up during the conversion.

A similar quality indicator in VB6 is the declaration of variables and variable types. VB6 allows untyped variables in the form of variants. Actually, VB6 doesn't even require variables to be declared. In most cases, using variants is a bad programming practice; not declaring variables is always a bad programming practice.

So, the first thing to do when converting VB6 code to VB.NET is to add the Option Explicit to all code files, ensuring that all variables are declared. Next, specify all variable types, eliminating all variants that really only hold a single type. In many cases, it's obvious what type a variable should be, but incorrectly changing a variant that should be an Integer, Long, Single, or Double to a different type can cause bugs that are difficult both to detect and troubleshoot. This is one reason why I recommend a complete testing cycle after preparing VB6 code for conversion, but before doing the final conversion. If you can add more tests for corner cases in any math routines to your test suite, it would probably be worth it.

Another good practice is to declare one variable per line. Dim a, b, c As Integer creates two Variants and one Integer, not the three Integers you might expect. This error is more likely to cause problems in VB.NET than in VB6.

If your code is in an earlier version of VB, convert it to VB6 first. Next, if you use DAO or RDO to access databases, rewrite it to use ADO (more on this in the next article). VB.NET 2003 does a better job of converting VB than the original VB.NET, so if you're going to convert to .NET, it makes sense to skip VB.NET 2002 and convert straight to VB.NET 2003. Because of this, I won't cover converting VB.NET 2002, but most of the information given here will still apply if you choose that route.

After the upgrade, the new .NET project will be in its own folder, with the original VB6 project unchanged, so you can do as many trial runs as you like, and use the upgrade reports as guides to issues to correct before doing the final conversion. The update report is an html file listing files and the errors in each file.

VB6 and ActiveX Controls
Most of the basic VB6 controls will be upgraded by the wizard without any issues, as will many advanced and third-party controls. Even complex ActiveX controls like the MSChart and third party controls are likely to convert with only minor changes in syntax. For instance, the MSChart control converts and mostly behaves like the original. The biggest difference is that the Axis is accessed as a property in VB6, but this is done by using an accessor in VB.NET. For example, in VB6 the XAxis maximum value is set by the statement:

MSChart1.Plot.Axis(VtChAxisIdY,0).ValueScale.Maximum = 370

In VB.NET, it is set by the statement:

MSChart1.Plot.get_Axis(VtChAxisIdY,0).ValueScale.Maximum = 370;

As far as I can tell, this is the only property of MSChart that is treated with this minor difference. The wizard will automatically create a wrapper for any ActiveX controls used in the project. You can also create a wrapper for any ActiveX control you want to use in a .NET program by simply right-clicking on the toolbox, selecting add/remove items, and then choosing the ActiveX control from the COM tab of the Dialog Box. This task can also be accomplished by running the TlbImp.exe utility that comes with the free .NET SDK. One small difference: an "upgraded" ActiveX control is referred to by its original name when referenced in the program, but an ActiveX control added to a new .NET project gets an "ax" prefix. For instance, when upgraded from a VB6 project, MSChart stays MSChart; when added to a .NET project, it becomes axMSChart.

While complex components and ActiveX controls are moved to .NET via the use of wrappers, basic VB6 controls are upgraded to (replaced by) VB.NET controls.


Page 2 of 3   « previous page   next page »

About Dennis Hayes
Dennis Hayes is a programmer at Georgia Tech in Atlanta Georgia where he writes software for the Adult Cognition Lab in the Psychology Department. He has been involved with the Mono project for over six years, and has been writing the Monkey Business column for over five years.

MICROSOFT .NET LATEST STORIES
Icahn Moves To Force Microsoft & Yahoo Together
Corporate raider Carl Icahn started his proxy fight for control of Yahoo this morning, beginning with the classic Icahn opening, the letter of reproach to the Yahoo board telling them they have acted 'irrationally and lost the faith of shareholders and Microsoft.'
IBM, Microsoft & Google Eras of Computing
By now it is conventional wisdom to say that there was an IBM Era of computing, then a Microsoft Era, and now we are in the Google Era. In this post, I will explain why Microsoft was not the 'next IBM' and why Google is not the 'next Microsoft' - there are significant qualitative diffe
Book Review: ASP.NET 2.0
ASP.NET developers are bored with traditional books that outline concepts in a lengthy way. These books are good if you like to learn the features in a detailed manner. However, by the time the book is read, a new version will be released. Hence, many learners including myself prefer s
3rd International Virtualization Conference & Expo: Themes & Topics
From Application Virtualization to Xen, a round-up of the virtualization themes & topics being discussed in NYC June 23-24, 2008 by the world-class speaker faculty at the 3rd International Virtualization Conference & Expo being held by SYS-CON Events in The Roosevelt Hotel, in midtown
"RIA" vs "Rich Client Platform": The Term Is Now Up for Debate
'RIA' is slowly fading in terms of its definition. When I first started the RIA Evangelism role in Microsoft, I had this nagging feeling that the term RIA was just all over the place. Depending on which technology you are backing and which stream of alliance you uphold, the truth is th
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS

ADS BY GOOGLE
BREAKING NEWS FROM THE WIRES
Strangeloop Networks Selected for Red Herring 100 North America 2008
Strangeloop Networks (TM) Inc., a leading provider of solutions that accelerate dynamic web