I love my dual core Intel Centrino Pro based Thinkpad T61p, except it doesn't make Outlook run any faster than my old T42 which had exactly half the processors and a similar clock speed. Welcome to the reality of multi-core - old single threaded apps humming along at the same speed on dual, quad, octa (n-tuple) core machines.

The reason is now becoming fairly well known: the issue is we're starting to hit physical walls when trying to bump clock speeds higher. I've talked about this problem in depth before, so I won't rehash it, but essentially higher frequencies == more power == more cooling & more leakage, and we've hit walls on how much we can cool, and how much leakage we can cope with. There's been a few interesting CPU design announcements which have helped reduce the problem somewhat (see: High-k and Metal Gate Make-Over at 45nm, and Intels Fundamental Advance in Transistor Design Extends Moore's Law, Computing Performance), but for the foreseeable future, we're stuck with ever expanding L1/L2/L3 caches, higher throughput through architecture innovation, more cores, and slight movements forward in terms of clock frequency.

Now don't get me wrong - more cache, and better per-clock-cycle execution bang for buck is great news, and hopefully it will make Outlook run that little bit faster, but I've got this whole extra processor sitting around waiting to slurp up instructions. Why can't it help render the Outlook UI, or re-index my Mail store?

And let's be clear here - Moore's law is still going strong - we're just getting different processor scaling to what we've enjoyed before. It's a classic software/hardware impedance mismatch that is at the root of this problem.

• The World's Eight Most Excellent Software Adventures, Part One
• The World's Eight Most Excellent Software Adventures - Part Two