Welcome!

.NET Authors: Brad Abrams, Alin Irimie, Colin Walker, Maureen O'Gara, Reuven Cohen

Related Topics: .NET

.NET: Article

Does Java Patents Case Affect Microsoft Too?

Does Java Patents Case Affect Microsoft Too?

Microsoft is a licensee of US Patent Trademark Office patents numbered 5226161, 5206951, and 5421012, the Eastman Kodak Co. confirmed yesterday, seemingly ending speculation - in the wake of Kodak's victory in its patent infringement suit against Sun - that perhaps IBM, HP, and Microsoft would be the next companies taken to court over the Kodak-patented way for a piece of software to "ask for help" from another application. A method that not only Java but also .NET relies on heavily, since it is more or less the keystone to OO programming.

Eastman Kodak purchased the patents in question from Wang Laboratories in 1997 when it bought Wang's imaging software business for $260 million and is now looking for restitution in the damages part of the trial against Sun to the tune of $1.06 billion in past royalties - which Kodak's lawyers calculate represents half of Sun's operating profit from the sales of computer servers and storage equipment between January 1998 and June 2001.

Patent 5206951 covers the integration of data between typed objects by mutual, direct invocation between object managers corresponding to object types.

Patent 5421012 covers multitasking computer system for integrating the operation of different application programs which manipulate data objects of different types.

And Patent 5226161 covers integration of data between typed data structures by mutual direct invocation between data managers corresponding to data types

A spokesman for Kodak said on Friday, as a federal jury found in its favor: "Kodak has and continues to make substantial technology investments to ensure high-quality products. We are pleased that the court has validated Kodak's intellectual property rights protecting these valuable innovations."

Microsoft .NET developers will be relieved to hear that they do not face the same kind of litigation from Kodak. $1.06 billion is more than just chump change, even for Redmond.

More Stories By .NETDJ News Desk

.NETDJ News Desk monitors Microsoft .NET and its related technologies, including Silverlight, to present IT professionals with news, updates on technology advances, business trends, new products and standards, and insight.

Comments (7) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
David 10/13/04 11:59:08 AM EDT

MSFT isn't worried because they already license the patents. Kodak is just doing what the broken patent system demands that they do. Finally, Sun "only" had to pay $92M for the rights, not the billion initially mentioned.

Carl 10/13/04 10:15:03 AM EDT

This is ridiculous,unfair and unethical... patenting OOP concepts and then charging royalties, the courts should not have allowed this, its seting a bad prescedent, KODAK sucks, MICROSOFT SUCKS BIG TIME, BTW why do .NET developers not have to worry about law suits being filed, do they not use OOP concepts in .NET (which wouldnt surprise me ;)

JESUS 10/13/04 09:20:42 AM EDT

It's something like if I patent the way the cars advance with four tires. The patents owned by Kodak are universal concepts of OOP.

Renrew 10/13/04 08:47:10 AM EDT

It certainly reflects poorly on PTO to assign patents for concepts that have for long been part of the educational package in operating systems, concurrent systems and real-time systems.
Just look for instance at the work of C.A.R. Hoare in the mid 70's (CSP, ...)

Nigel 10/13/04 03:50:22 AM EDT

I like the fact Sun have been got but I dont think such fundamental concepts should be patentable in the first place.

Randy 10/13/04 12:48:56 AM EDT

It's about time Sun gets a taste of there own medicine. They been chasing Microsoft around with silly lawsuits for years. Good for you Kodak!

Mehdi 10/13/04 12:15:57 AM EDT

Common, this is silly. Kodak, the dying company wants to make a lot of money of something it never knew they owned!
Please correct me people but isn't this unfair?