Welcome!

.NET Authors: Lori MacVittie, Yeshim Deniz, Ivan Antsipau, Liz McMillan, Michael Bushong

Related Topics: .NET

.NET: Article

Questions and Answers on the .NET Compact Framework

Questions and Answers on the .NET Compact Framework

As many developers are already aware, the impending release of Visual Studio .NET 2003 will serve to bring the benefits of XML Web Services and the Microsoft Windows .NET Framework to smart devices via the inclusion of the .NET Compact Framework and Smart Device Projects. However, for those not already initiated, the following excerpts from Building Solutions with the .NET Compact Framework will explore the five basic questions that every developer asks when first thinking about the Compact Framework.

What Are the Goals of the Compact Framework?
Simply put, the goals of the Compact Framework (and Smart Device Projects) are fourfold:

  • To provide a portable (and small) subset of the Windows .NET Framework targeting multiple platforms. This includes the creation of a runtime engine, class libraries, and compilers for VB and C# that together are referred to as the .NET Compact Framework. This framework is not a simple port of the desktop version, but a complete rewrite designed to execute managed code on multiple CPU architectures and operating systems through an abstraction layer known as the Platform Adaption Layer (PAL). It is important to note that the Compact Framework was also designed to be a subset of the desktop version of the Framework. As a result, roughly 25% of the desktop types are represented in the Compact Framework.
  • Leverage VS .NET. Since VS .NET already provides a high productivity development environment, it is only natural that this environment should be utilized in developing mobile applications as well. To that end, the Smart Device Projects for VS .NET 2003 provide the project templates, emulator, debugger, and device integration to use the same IDE for desktop as for mobile development.
  • True Emulation. One of the requirements for developing robust (i.e., well-debugged) mobile applications is that they run as expected when installed on the device. To that end VS.NET includes emulators for Pocket PC and Windows CE that run exactly the same execution engine and class libraries as those installed on the device. In addition, the emulator supports localized packages for developing global applications. In this way, developers can be assured that the code they write and test with the emulator will execute correctly when deployed to the device.
  • Enable Web Services on Devices. Since XML Web Services are by definition device independent, they can be used from a variety of devices. By building support for consuming web services directly into the Compact Framework, developers can easily call web services.

    On Which Platforms Does It Run?
    Since 1992 Microsoft has produced a series of platforms (9 if our count is correct) built on the Windows CE operating system. A platform includes a specific set of hardware coupled with a version of Windows CE and associated software that makes it easier for developers and device manufacturers to target their solutions. The Compact Framework supports the Pocket PC 2000, 2002, and embedded Windows CE .NET 4.1 platforms. Although not officially supported, Compact Framework code also runs on Pocket PC Phone Edition devices that are a superset of Pocket PC 2002. Also not supported are smartphones such as the SPV from Orange.

    Because the Compact Framework is a managed environment, each device that executes applications written using the Compact Framework must have the framework installed. As of this writing, there were no devices shipping that included the Compact Framework as a standard component in RAM or in ROM. However, look for future devices running Windows CE .NET to include the runtime.

    What About ASP.NET Mobile Controls (aka the Mobile Internet Toolkit)?
    Many developers new to developing for mobility are at first confused by the differences between the Compact Framework and ASP.NET Mobile Controls. In a nutshell here are the primary differences.

  • The ASP.NET Mobile Controls are a server side technology whereas the Compact Framework is a client side technology. This means that code written using mobile controls must execute on a server, and not directly on the device, by producing markup language that is interpreted by the device using a browser or parser. Code written for the Compact Framework executes directly on the device using just-in-time (JIT) compilation and native execution.
  • The ASP.NET Mobile Controls are based on ASP.NET and use the ASP.NET HTTP runtime to handle and process requests via a set of ASP.NET server controls specially designed for small form factor devices. This means that mobile controls require an ASP.NET web server (IIS 5.0 or 6.0). The device issues requests that are processed on the web server by the controls producing markup language.
  • Both ASP.NET Mobile Controls and the Compact Framework are based on the desktop Framework and VS .NET. In the case of mobile controls, developers use VS .NET to write ASP.NET code using the ASP.NET server controls. The server side code is JIT compiled and executed on the web server by the common language runtime. In the case of the Compact Framework the code is written using SDP and subsequently downloaded to the device for JITting and execution using a compact version of the common language runtime.
  • The ASP.NET Mobile Controls are more flexible in that they can dynamically produce various markup languages depending on the requesting device they dynamically detect, including WML, cHTML, HTML, and XHTML (in Visual Studio .NET 2003 and the Framework v1.1). This means that mobile controls can support a broader range of devices (over 200 at last count) including wireless web phones, Pocket PCs, and virtually any device that supports HTTP and HTML. The ASP.NET Mobile Controls also include the ability to add device specific customizations so that as new devices come online their feature set can be identified.
  • Since code written for the Compact Framework is downloaded to the device, the Compact Framework supports connected, occasionally connected, and disconnected scenarios and supports local data storage using XML or SQL Server 2000 Windows CE Edition. ASP.NET Mobile Controls only support the former since an HTTP connection is required to request an ASP.NET page that uses the mobile controls. Basically, this means that mobile controls are targeted for building web sites for a broad variety of connected devices and at the same time not having to rewrite the vast majority of code to deal with differences between those devices.

    As a result you can (and in our estimation should) consider architecting and building your applications using the Compact Framework and SDP when the following are true.

  • You are developing code that will execute on the device, as opposed to applications developed with the ASP.NET Mobile Controls
  • Your applications must run in disconnected, connected, or occasionally connected modes
  • You are targeting the Pocket PC 2000, 2002 or embedded Windows CE .NET platforms

    What's Missing in the Compact Framework?
    In order to accommodate the restricted resources on smart devices the Compact Framework was designed as a subset of the desktop libraries and in fact includes just over 1,700 types, or roughly 25% of the desktop framework. As a result, developers familiar with the desktop Framework should not expect all the functionality they are accustomed to. The most important omissions are listed here:

  • ASP.NET. Because the Compact Framework is designed to support applications that execute on the device, it does not include any support for building web pages hosted on a web server running on the device.
  • COM Interop. Since the Windows CE operating system and the embedded Visual C++ (eVC) tool support creating COM components and ActiveX controls, it would be nice if the Compact Framework supported the same COM Interop functionality (complete with COM callable wrappers and interop assemblies) as does the desktop Framework. Unfortunately, COM Interop did not make it into the initial release of the Compact Framework. However, it is possible to create a DLL wrapper for a COM component using eVC++ and then call the wrapper using the Platform Invoke (PInvoke) feature of the Compact Framework, which allows native APIs to be called.
  • OleDb Access. The Compact Framework omits the System.Data.OleDb namespace and so does not support the ability to make calls directly to a database using the OleDb .NET Data Provider.
  • Generic Serialization. The desktop Framework supports binary serialization of any object through the use of the Serializable attribute, the ISerializable interface, and the XmlSerializer class in the System.Xml.Serialization namespace. This functionality is not supported in the Compact Framework. However, the Compact Framework does support serializing objects to XML for use in XML Web Services and serializing DataSet objects to XML.
  • Asynchronous Delegates. Delegates in both the desktop Framework and Compact Framework can be thought of as object-oriented function pointers. They are used to encapsulate the signature and address of a method to invoke at runtime. While delegates can be called synchronously, they cannot be invoked asynchronously and passed a callback method in the Compact Framework. However, it should be noted that asynchronous operations are supported for some of the networking functionality found in the System.Net namespace and when calling XML Web Services. In other cases, direct manipulation of threads or the use of a thread pool is required.
  • .NET Remoting. In the desktop Framework, it is possible to create applications that communicate with each other across application domains using classes in the System.Runtime.Remoting namespace. This technique allows for data and objects serialized to SOAP or a binary format to be transmitted using TCP or HTTP. This functionality is not supported (in part because Generic Serialization is not supported) in the Compact Framework where instead XML Web Services and IrDA can be used.
  • Reflection Emit. Although the Compact Framework does support runtime type inspection using the System.Reflection namespace, it does not support the ability to emit dynamically created MSIL into an assembly for execution.
  • Printing. Although the Compact Framework does support graphics and drawing, it does not support printing through the System.Drawing.Printing namespace.
  • XPath/XSLT. Support for XML is included in the Compact Framework and allows developers to read and write XML documents using the XmlDocument, XmlReader, and XmlWriter classes. However, it does not support executing XPath queries or performing XSL transformations.
  • Server-side Programming Models. As you would expect, the Compact Framework also does not support the server-side programming models including System.EnterpriseServices (COM+), System.Management (WMI), and System.Messaging (MSMQ).
  • Multi-module Assemblies. The desktop Framework supports the ability to deploy an assembly as a collection of files. This is useful for creating assemblies authored with multiple languages. This feature is not supported in the Compact Framework where a single file (.exe or .dll) represents the entire assembly.

    However, the Compact Framework does support two additional namespaces to support features particular to smart devices (see Table 1).

    In addition, support for the IrDA protocol has been included in the Compact Framework and exposed in the six classes found in the System.Net.Sockets and the System.Net namespaces.

    What Do Developers Need to Learn to Use the Compact Framework Effectively?
    Although VB 6.0 and embedded VB (eVB) developers will feel fairly comfortable with the VB syntax used in SDP, the object-oriented nature of the Compact Framework means that developers need to have a firm grounding in OO concepts in order to maximize their productivity.

    For example, the class libraries in the Compact Framework make extensive use of both implementation and interface inheritance. Developers familiar with these concepts can not only more easily understand the framework, but can write polymorphic code using the framework that is more maintainable and flexible than the component based development typically done in eVB. In the long run, using OO in their own designs allows developers to write less code and make the code that they do write more reusable. Therefore, to take maximum advantage of OO, however, a development organization should also get up to speed on the use of design patterns.

    Of course, because of its close association with the .NET Framework, existing Framework developers will also have a leg up.

    SIDEBAR

    Title:
    Building Solutions with the .NET Compact Framework

    Authors:
    Jon Box and Dan Fox

    Publisher:
    Addison-Wesley

    ISBN:
    0321197887

    Availability: June 2003

  • More Stories By Jon Box

    Jon Box is an Architect Evangelist in Developer & Platform Evangelism with the Microsoft Corporation. He coauthored Building Solutions with the Microsoft .NET Compact Framework, published by Addison-Wesley, and blogs at http://blogs.msdn.com/jonbox/default.aspx.

    Comments (0)

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Add your comment
    You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

    In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


    @ThingsExpo Stories
    The Internet of Things (IoT) is going to require a new way of thinking and of developing software for speed, security and innovation. This requires IT leaders to balance business as usual while anticipating for the next market and technology trends. Cloud provides the right IT asset portfolio to help today’s IT leaders manage the old and prepare for the new. Today the cloud conversation is evolving from private and public to hybrid. This session will provide use cases and insights to reinforce the value of the network in helping organizations to maximize their company’s cloud experience.
    Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have spoken with, or attended presentations from, utilities in the United States, South America, Asia and Europe. This session will provide a look at the CREPE drivers for SmartGrids and the solution spaces used by SmartGrids today and planned for the near future. All organizations can learn from SmartGrid’s use of Predictive Maintenance, Demand Prediction, Cloud, Big Data and Customer-facing Dashboards...
    All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices – computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors – connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo in Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be!
    Noted IoT expert and researcher Joseph di Paolantonio (pictured below) has joined the @ThingsExpo faculty. Joseph, who describes himself as an “Independent Thinker” from DataArchon, will speak on the topic of “Smart Grids & Managing Big Utilities.” Over his career, Joseph di Paolantonio has worked in the energy, renewables, aerospace, telecommunications, and information technology industries. His expertise is in data analysis, system engineering, Bayesian statistics, data warehouses, business intelligence, data mining, predictive methods, and very large databases (VLDB). Prior to DataArchon, he served as a VP and Principal Analyst with Constellation Group. He is a member of the Boulder (Colo.) Brain Trust, an organization with a mission “to benefit the Business Intelligence and data management industry by providing pro bono exchange of information between vendors and independent analysts on new trends and technologies and to provide vendors with constructive feedback on their of...
    Software AG helps organizations transform into Digital Enterprises, so they can differentiate from competitors and better engage customers, partners and employees. Using the Software AG Suite, companies can close the gap between business and IT to create digital systems of differentiation that drive front-line agility. We offer four on-ramps to the Digital Enterprise: alignment through collaborative process analysis; transformation through portfolio management; agility through process automation and integration; and visibility through intelligent business operations and big data.
    There will be 50 billion Internet connected devices by 2020. Today, every manufacturer has a propriety protocol and an app. How do we securely integrate these "things" into our lives and businesses in a way that we can easily control and manage? Even better, how do we integrate these "things" so that they control and manage each other so our lives become more convenient or our businesses become more profitable and/or safe? We have heard that the best interface is no interface. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Co-Founder & CTO at Octoblu, Inc., will discuss how these devices generate enough data to learn our behaviors and simplify/improve our lives. What if we could connect everything to everything? I'm not only talking about connecting things to things but also systems, cloud services, and people. Add in a little machine learning and artificial intelligence and now we have something interesting...
    Last week, while in San Francisco, I used the Uber app and service four times. All four experiences were great, although one of the drivers stopped for 30 seconds and then left as I was walking up to the car. He must have realized I was a blogger. None the less, the next car was just a minute away and I suffered no pain. In this article, my colleague, Ved Sen, Global Head, Advisory Services Social, Mobile and Sensors at Cognizant shares his experiences and insights.
    We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) irreversibly encoded. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Peter Dunkley, Technical Director at Acision, will look at how this identity problem can be solved and discuss ways to use existing web identities for real-time communication.
    Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. It also ensured scalability and better service for customers, including MUY! Companies, one of the country's largest franchise restaurant companies with 232 Pizza Hut locations. This is one example of WebRTC adoption today, but the potential is limitless when powered by IoT. Attendees will learn real-world benefits of WebRTC and explore future possibilities, as WebRTC and IoT intersect to improve customer service.
    From telemedicine to smart cars, digital homes and industrial monitoring, the explosive growth of IoT has created exciting new business opportunities for real time calls and messaging. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Ivelin Ivanov, CEO and Co-Founder of Telestax, will share some of the new revenue sources that IoT created for Restcomm – the open source telephony platform from Telestax. Ivelin Ivanov is a technology entrepreneur who founded Mobicents, an Open Source VoIP Platform, to help create, deploy, and manage applications integrating voice, video and data. He is the co-founder of TeleStax, an Open Source Cloud Communications company that helps the shift from legacy IN/SS7 telco networks to IP-based cloud comms. An early investor in multiple start-ups, he still finds time to code for his companies and contribute to open source projects.
    The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to create new business models as significant as those that were inspired by the Internet and the smartphone 20 and 10 years ago. What business, social and practical implications will this phenomenon bring? That's the subject of "Monetizing the Internet of Things: Perspectives from the Front Lines," an e-book released today and available free of charge from Aria Systems, the leading innovator in recurring revenue management.
    The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges.
    There’s Big Data, then there’s really Big Data from the Internet of Things. IoT is evolving to include many data possibilities like new types of event, log and network data. The volumes are enormous, generating tens of billions of logs per day, which raise data challenges. Early IoT deployments are relying heavily on both the cloud and managed service providers to navigate these challenges. In her session at 6th Big Data Expo®, Hannah Smalltree, Director at Treasure Data, to discuss how IoT, Big Data and deployments are processing massive data volumes from wearables, utilities and other machines.
    P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Erik Lagerway, Co-founder of Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services to the modern P2P RTC era of OTT cloud assisted services.
    While great strides have been made relative to the video aspects of remote collaboration, audio technology has basically stagnated. Typically all audio is mixed to a single monaural stream and emanates from a single point, such as a speakerphone or a speaker associated with a video monitor. This leads to confusion and lack of understanding among participants especially regarding who is actually speaking. Spatial teleconferencing introduces the concept of acoustic spatial separation between conference participants in three dimensional space. This has been shown to significantly improve comprehension and conference efficiency.
    The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, will discuss single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example to explain some of these concepts including when to use different storage models.
    SYS-CON Events announced today that Gridstore™, the leader in software-defined storage (SDS) purpose-built for Windows Servers and Hyper-V, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 15th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Gridstore™ is the leader in software-defined storage purpose built for virtualization that is designed to accelerate applications in virtualized environments. Using its patented Server-Side Virtual Controller™ Technology (SVCT) to eliminate the I/O blender effect and accelerate applications Gridstore delivers vmOptimized™ Storage that self-optimizes to each application or VM across both virtual and physical environments. Leveraging a grid architecture, Gridstore delivers the first end-to-end storage QoS to ensure the most important App or VM performance is never compromised. The storage grid, that uses Gridstore’s performance optimized nodes or capacity optimized nodes, starts with as few a...
    The Transparent Cloud-computing Consortium (abbreviation: T-Cloud Consortium) will conduct research activities into changes in the computing model as a result of collaboration between "device" and "cloud" and the creation of new value and markets through organic data processing High speed and high quality networks, and dramatic improvements in computer processing capabilities, have greatly changed the nature of applications and made the storing and processing of data on the network commonplace. These technological reforms have not only changed computers and smartphones, but are also changing the data processing model for all information devices. In particular, in the area known as M2M (Machine-To-Machine), there are great expectations that information with a new type of value can be produced using a variety of devices and sensors saving/sharing data via the network and through large-scale cloud-type data processing. This consortium believes that attaching a huge number of devic...
    Innodisk is a service-driven provider of industrial embedded flash and DRAM storage products and technologies, with a focus on the enterprise, industrial, aerospace, and defense industries. Innodisk is dedicated to serving their customers and business partners. Quality is vitally important when it comes to industrial embedded flash and DRAM storage products. That’s why Innodisk manufactures all of their products in their own purpose-built memory production facility. In fact, they designed and built their production center to maximize manufacturing efficiency and guarantee the highest quality of our products.
    All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. Over the summer Gartner released its much anticipated annual Hype Cycle report and the big news is that Internet of Things has now replaced Big Data as the most hyped technology. Indeed, we're hearing more and more about this fascinating new technological paradigm. Every other IT news item seems to be about IoT and its implications on the future of digital business.