Welcome!

.NET Authors: Elizabeth White, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Trevor Parsons, Peter Silva, Yeshim Deniz

News Feed Item

Kaminak Reports Robust PEA at US $1250/oz Gold on Coffee Gold Project

Pre-Tax NPV@5% of $522 million and IRR of 32.8%; Average Annual Gold Production of 167,000 Ounces and All-In Sustaining Costs of US$688/oz

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 06/11/14 -- Kaminak Gold Corporation (TSX VENTURE:KAM) is pleased to announce the results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) prepared pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) on the Company's 100% owned Coffee Gold Project (Coffee), located 130km south of Dawson City, Yukon. The study indicates that Coffee represents a robust, high margin, rapid pay-back, 11-year open pit mining project at current gold prices. The study was prepared by JDS Energy & Mining Inc., an established Yukon mine builder, under the direction of Fred Lightner (Director of Mine Development, Kaminak) with contributions from Kappes Cassiday and Associates, Knight Piesold and Co. and SIM Geological Inc. At a gold-price of US$1250/oz and using an exchange rate of C$1.00 equal US$0.95, Coffee generates a pre-tax net present value (NPV) at a 5% discount rate of more than $500 million and an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 33%. Further, the mine could become a significant Yukon gold producer, yielding close to 450,000 ounces in the first two years and producing an average of 167,000 ounces annually over the life of mine at an all-in sustaining cash cost of US$688 per ounce of gold.

Kaminak will be hosting a live video webcast presentation at 10:30am Eastern Time (7:30am Pacific Time) on June 11, 2014 to discuss the results of the PEA. To participate in the live webcast, please click the following link: http://kaminak.com/investors/register/. For those who cannot participate, the video webcast will be archived on Kaminak's website (www.kaminak.com) within 24 hours of the presentation.

The PEA envisages an owner-operated, approximately 11-year open-pit mine targeting 53 million tonnes of primarily oxide facies material at an average diluted grade of 1.23 grams/tonne gold (g/t Au). The study incorporates a three-stage crushing circuit and a valley fill heap leach facility designed by Knight Piesold and Co., along with a standard carbon adsorption gold recovery plant to produce 1,859,000 ounces of gold dore over life of mine (LOM). It should be noted that the study outlines several opportunities to further enhance economics (see below) and the current resource remains open along strike and to depth. Further, more than 20km of untested gold in soil anomalies remain to be evaluated and Kaminak remains confident that additional near surface oxide resources can be identified in the near term; drilling is ongoing.

Highlights (all amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated; base case is stated using a gold price of US$ 1,250 per ounce and an exchange rate of C$1.00 equal US$0.95):


--  NPV of $522 million at a 5% discount rate and an IRR of 32.8% before
    taxes and mining duties, and an NPV of $330 million and an IRR of 26.2%
    after taxes and mining duties 
--  Mine life of 11 years with peak production of 231,000 ounces per annum
    (Year 1) and average LOM production of 167,000 ounces of gold 
--  Average metallurgical recoveries of 88% gold 
--  1,859,000 ounces LOM gold production at an average diluted grade of 1.23
    g/t Au 
--  All-in sustaining costs(i) of US $688/oz (including royalties) for LOM,
    generating an Operating margin of over US $560/oz or 42% 
--  Initial capital costs of $305 million (including a 15% contingency) 
--  Payback of 1.8 years pre-tax and 2.0 years post-tax 
--  Gross Revenue of $2.4 Billion and Operating Cash-flow of $1.24 Billion
    (i) All-in Sustaining Costs are presented as defined by the World Gold
    Council ("WGC") less Corporate G&A.

Eira Thomas, CEO commented: "The recently completed Coffee PEA has delivered a high value, high margin, low risk gold project in one of the World's safest, pro-mining jurisdictions, Yukon Canada, and marks a significant milestone for our Company. At a US $1250 gold-price, Coffee will generate more than $2 billion in gross revenue, deliver total life of mine, pre-tax, free cash of $800 million and payback capital in under 2 years. Further upside to this evaluation is anticipated through optimization studies and continued exploration. All of the deposits in the current resource remain open along strike and to depth."

Fred Lightner, Kaminak's Director of Mine Development, stated: "With the completion of the PEA, we now have an initial look at the economic potential of the Coffee Project. The grade of the deposit and strip ratio, metallurgical response, and relatively low operating costs are strong factors which create value. We believe that with additional exploration, delineation drilling, and project engineering the project will be further enhanced."

JDS Energy & Mining Inc. (JDS) was engaged by Kaminak Gold Corporation in 2013, under the direction of Fred Lightner (Director of Mine Development, Kaminak) to produce an independent Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Coffee Gold Project. A technical report following the guidelines of the Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 will be filed on SEDAR and on the Company website within 45 days.

The reader is advised that the PEA summarized in this press release is intended to provide only an initial, high-level review of the project potential and design options. The PEA mine plan and economic model include the use of Inferred resources. Inferred resources are considered to be too speculative to be used in an economic analysis except as allowed for by Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) in PEA studies. There is no guarantee that Inferred resources can be converted to Indicated or Measured resources, and as such, there is no guarantee the project economics described herein will be achieved.

PEA Summary (Reported in 2014 Canadian $, except where noted)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Heap Leach Material Mined (tonnes)                          53,400,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Diluted Grade of Heap Leach Material (g/t Au)                   1.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Waste (tonnes)                                             212,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Strip Ratio (Waste : Heap Leach Material)                                4.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Gold Contained (oz.)                                         2,111,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Au Produced (oz.)                                            1,859,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Recovery (%)                                                        88%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Gold Production of Year 1 and 2 (oz. per year)               224,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Initial Capital Cost (including 15% contingency)          $304,800,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining Capital (including 15% contingency)                  $145,500,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Life of Mine Capital (including 15% contingency)          $450,300,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unit Operating Costs (per tonne leached)                                    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Mining      $11.86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Processing       $6.67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        General & Administrative       $4.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Operating Costs                                                 $22.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary Economics at US$1250/oz. Gold:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total LOM Operating Cash Flow (C$M)                                  $1246.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total LOM Pre-Tax Free Cash Flow (C$M)                                $796.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual Pre-Tax Free Cash Flow (C$M)                            $72.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Income Taxes (C$M)                                                $280.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total LOM After-Tax Free Cash Flow (C$M)                              $515.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual After-Tax Free Cash Flow (C$M)                          $46.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discount Rate                                                             5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Tax NPV (C$M)                                                     $522.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Tax IRR                                                            32.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Tax Payback (Yrs)                                                    1.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
After-Tax NPV (C$M)                                                   $330.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
After-Tax IRR                                                          26.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
After-Tax Payback (Yrs)                                                  2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         US $(i)         C $
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Cost ($/oz)                                         $613.15     $645.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Cost Incl. Sustaining CAPEX ($/oz)(ii)              $687.50     $723.69
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Exchange rate of C$1.00 equal US$0.95 was used.                         
(ii) All-in Sustaining Costs are presented as defined by the World Gold     
 Council ("WGC") less Corporate G&A.                                        

All in Cash Costs Including Sustaining Capex


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-Site Mining & Rehandle (C$M)                                       $610.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-Site Processing (C$M)                                              $343.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-Site G&A (C$M)                                                     $205.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refining (C$M)                                                         $14.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties (C$M)                                                        $26.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining (C$M)                                                       $99.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closure (C$M)                                                          $46.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Total (C$M)    $1,345.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-in Cash + Sustaining Cost (C$/oz)(i)                             $723.69
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-in Cash + Sustaining Cost (US$/oz)(i)                            $687.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) All-in Sustaining Costs are presented as defined by the World Gold      
 Council ("WGC") less Corporate G&A. Exchange rate of C$1.00 equal US$0.95  
 was used.                                                                  

The Base Case summarized above was selected and reported to take advantage of the economies of scale that are realized with high production rates and to demonstrate the project potential from the known resources. The base case assumed an owner operated open pit mine, three-stage crushing circuit to nominal 12.5 mm, a valley fill heap leach facility, and a carbon adsorption gold recovery plant to produce gold dore. Other assumptions include access to site via an all-season road and power generation using diesel. Total installed power, including process equipment and other site infrastructure is estimated to be 5.0 megawatts (MW). The average operating power demand is 3.6 MW. With additional exploration and based on past performance, the possibility to expand the near surface oxide resources exists.

Sensitivities:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Price US$/oz           $1,000 $1,100 $1,200 $1,250 $1,300 $1,400 $1,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Tax NPV 5% C$M            $165   $308   $451   $522   $594   $737   $880
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
After-Tax NPV 5% C$M           $99   $194   $285   $330   $375   $465   $553
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Tax IRR                    15%    23%    30%    33%    36%    42%    48%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
After-Tax IRR                  12%    18%    24%    26%    29%    33%    38%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Tax Payback                4.4    3.2      2    1.8    1.6    1.4    1.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
After-Tax Payback Yrs          4.7    3.5    2.5      2    1.8    1.6    1.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Opportunities to Enhance Value

Although Kaminak considers the PEA results for the base case excellent, future trade off studies are anticipated to evaluate alternate development scenarios that would be used to reduce the initial capital requirements. Such items as coarser crushing or run-of-mine leaching coupled with high fragmentation blasting in the mine, contract mining or mine equipment leasing, liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a potential power generation fuel source and a staged development of a smaller project followed by expansion, are a few of the scenarios being considered. Moreover, Coffee has high potential for resource expansion; the deposits in the current resource remain open along strike and to depth, and more than 20 km of priority gold in soil anomalies outside of the current resource area remain to be drill-tested.

PEA DETAILS

Mineral Resources:

The PEA is based on an Indicated and Inferred mineral resource estimate completed by independent Qualified Person Robert Sim, P.Geo., of SIM Geological Inc. and was derived from 961 diamond core and reverse circulation drill holes completed from 2010 to 2013 for a total of 185,000 metres. This estimate consists of 719,000 ounces Indicated (14 Mt grading at 1.56g/t Au), and 3,434,000 ounces Inferred (79 Mt grading at 1.36g/t Au) using base case cut-off of 0.5 grams per tonne gold ("g/t Au") for Oxide and Transitional material and a 1g/t Au cut-off for Sulphide material. For further details, please see Company press release of January 28, 2014 (http://kaminak.com/investors/news_releases/index.php?&content_id=539) and the NI 43-101 Technical Report released March 12, 2014.

Capital and Operating Costs Summary:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Pre-Prod   Sust/Clsr            
Capital Costs                                  (C$M)       (C$M) Total (C$M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Capitalized Mining                             $50.3        $0.0       $50.3
Pre-Prod Operating Costs                       $16.7        $0.0       $16.7
Site                                           $57.1        $4.8       $61.9
Mining Equipment                               $46.3       $64.5      $110.8
Leach Facility                                 $43.7       $17.2       $60.9
Crushing & Conveying                           $12.4        $0.0       $12.4
Camp                                           $10.3        $0.0       $10.3
Indirects                                      $37.0        $0.0       $37.0
Closure                                         $0.0       $40.0       $40.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Subtotal                                      $273.8      $126.5      $400.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingency                          15%       $31.0       $19.0       $50.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Capital Costs                           $304.8      $145.5      $450.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Costs                                                $/t Processed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining                                                                $11.86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing                                                             $6.67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
G&A                                                                    $4.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Operating Costs(i)                                              $22.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) The operating costs above are for the operational period only and do not
 include capitalized operating costs during pre-production.                 

Mining

Coffee is amenable to development as an open pit (OP) mine as all mineralized lodes commence at surface in all pits and pre-strip is limited to 1-2m of soil. Mining of the deposit is planned to produce a total of 53.4 Mt of heap leach feed and 212.4 Mt of waste (4.0:1 overall strip ratio) over a 13-year project production life which includes two years of pre-production. The current LOM plan focuses on achieving consistent heap leach production rates, and mining of higher grade material early in the production schedule. The tonnage and distribution of mined material is summarized below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Material Type                 Heap Leach Tonnage Mined      Distribution (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supremo Oxide                               39,100,000                    73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supremo Upper Transition                     1,200,000                     2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latte Oxide                                 10,500,000                    20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latte Upper Transition                         700,000                     1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Double Double Oxide                          1,200,000                     2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kona Oxide                                     700,000                     1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                       53,400,000                 100.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mine planning for Coffee was conducted using a combination of Mintec Inc., MineSight(TM) software and CAE NPV Scheduler (NPVS) software. Pit slopes range from 37 degrees to 50 degrees as derived from a preliminary geotechnical assessment completed by SRK Consulting (U.S.) Inc. A series of optimized shells were generated for each of Supremo, Double Double, Latte and Kona deposits based on varying revenue factors. Selected pits range from 75m depth (Kona) to 200m depth (Supremo). Cut off grades for Oxide mineralization is 0.31g/t Au for Supremo, Double Double and Kona, and 0.32g/t Au for Latte.

The proposed heap leach processing rate of 5.0 Mtpa was used, along with deposit and pit geometry constraints, to estimate the mining equipment fleet needed. The fleet has an estimated maximum capacity of 90,000 t/d total material, which would be sufficient for the LOM plan.

The total capital cost of the mining equipment of $110.8 million has been based on a detailed equipment list and budget cost quotations from a major equipment supplier. The initial pre-production capital cost of the mine is estimated at $46.3 million and the remaining cost of $64.5 million will be spent after the pre-production period as sustaining capital. It should be noted that the $304.8 million of initial capital in the economic model includes $50.3 million of mining costs that have been capitalized in the pre-production period.

The open pit mine operations require a total average of 100 personnel, mine maintenance requires 35 personnel, and supervision/technical needs a total of 30 personnel, for a total of 165 open pit personnel.

Open pit mining costs were calculated from first principles based on equipment required and include pit and dump operations, road maintenance, mine supervision and technical services cost.

The average open pit operating costs for the LOM plan (which includes pre-production mining) are listed below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Function                                       Average Cost (C$)/Tonne Mined
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drilling                                                               $0.28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blasting                                                               $0.39
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading                                                                $0.36
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hauling                                                                $0.71
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roads & Dumps                                                          $0.35
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Mine/Maintenance                                               $0.17
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supervision & Technical                                                $0.22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Open Pit Operating Cost                                          $2.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Processing

The process flowsheet includes a three-stage crushing plant followed by a heap leach operation. Gold is extracted by an Adsorption-Desorption-Recovery (ADR) carbon plant. The process flowsheet is based on a processing rate of 5.0 million dry tonnes per year.

The design particle crush size is minus 16 mm (80% passing 12.5 mm) however, rock types found to leach adequately at coarser sizes could bypass the tertiary crushing circuit. Based on experience gained during actual operations, the crush size for each rock type may be modified as conditions permit.

The estimates for ultimate gold recovery and major reagent consumptions for various rock types were based on the results of laboratory column leach tests conducted by Kappes Cassiday & Associates, industry leading experts in heap leach processing and consultants to Kinross for the development of the successful Ft. Knox Heap Leach mine in Alaska.

A summary of the ultimate recoveries and reagent consumptions used for each deposit facies is summarized below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Ultimate Au                              
                                      Recovery                              
Deposit Facies                               %     Reagent Consumptions     
                                              ------------------------------
                                                    NaCN kg/t       CaO kg/t
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supremo Oxide                               90           0.20           1.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supremo Upper Transition                    70           0.20           1.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latte Oxide                                 88           0.20           1.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latte Upper Transition                      44           0.20           1.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Double Double Oxide                         90           0.20           1.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kona Oxide                                  90           0.20           1.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Column leach test work was conducted under simulated cold climate conditions. Agglomeration was not required and low reagent consumption was reported.

The total capital cost of the process facilities of $73.3 million has been based on budget cost quotations from major equipment suppliers. The initial pre-production capital cost of the process facilities mine is estimated at $56.1 million and the remaining cost of $17.2 million will be spent after the pre-production period as sustaining capital. For the heap leach facility (HLF), Knight Piesold and Co. conducted a two phased conceptual study to first evaluate alternate locations for the siting of the HLF, followed by completion of design, scheduling and cost estimation to construct the HLF. Again it should be noted that the $304.8 million of initial capital in the economic model includes $8.7 million of processing costs that have been capitalized in the pre-production period.

Process operating costs were estimated to include all crushing, heap loading, and gold recovery activities to produce unrefined gold bullion (dore). Process manpower requirements were estimated to require 126 personnel. All reagents cost estimates were calculated by projected consumptions and estimated prices. All power is supplied by diesel generators and power costs are estimated at $0.35 per kilowatt hour.

The LOM process operating costs (which include pre-production processing) are summarized below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       $CDN / Year      $CDN / tonne leached
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crushing & Conveying                   $11,608,000                     $2.32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leach & Plant                          $18,503,000                     $3.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refine & Laboratory                     $3,228,000                     $0.65
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Processing Cost                  $33,339,000                     $6.67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Project Infrastructure and Indirects

The project envisions the construction of the following key infrastructure items to support the mine and process facilities:


--  Approximately 250 km all-season access road from the Klondike Highway at
    Carmacks to the project site; includes upgrading 74 km of existing road
    and building 179 km of new road 
--  Approximately 7 km of new on-site access roads for light vehicles to by-
    pass the active mining areas 
--  New airstrip 
--  Truck shop, warehouse and camp 
--  Fresh water supply developed from groundwater 
--  Bulk explosives storage and magazines 
--  Power plant and bulk fuel storage 
--  Potable, fire and sewage water systems 
--  Camp and administrative office 

The total capital cost of the project infrastructure and development indirect costs is $109.2 million based on a budget quotation to construct the access road, JDS' northern operating experience, and more specifically, their Yukon project experience. The all-season access road will be constructed to connect the project site to Carmacks, Yukon Territory, Canada. The conceptual design for the road includes upgrading approximately 74 km of existing public road and 179 km of new road construction (250 km total). The road will be designed as a single-lane (5m width), mine access road with intermittent turnouts and traffic will be radio controlled. The road will be suitable for semi-trailer trucks and will eliminate the need to supply the site by barge, ice-road or by air. The mine will own and operate a fleet of snow plows and graders used to maintain the road through the winter.

The initial pre-production capital cost of the infrastructure and indirects is $104.4 million and the sustaining cost is $4.8 million to be spent after the pre-production period. The General and Administrative operating costs for the operation are estimated to be approximately $20 million per year or $4.00 per tonne leached.

Environment, Reclamation and Stakeholder Engagement

In 2014, Kaminak initiated comprehensive environmental baseline studies, building on the environmental studies that have been ongoing since 2010 with the aim of completing an Environmental Impact Statement for submission in advance of Permitting. Kaminak will be seeking the input and involvement of local First Nations (Tr'ondek Hwech'in, Selkirk First Nation, White River First Nation and Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation) in the design and implementation of these baseline studies and is committed to working with stakeholders to ensure that concerns are addressed. A closure and reclamation plan will be prepared for the project proposal submission. Financial assurance must be posted to secure the closure and reclamation works. In the PEA, the estimate for the closure cost is $46,000,000, including a 15% contingency, and is based on the owner-operator closing the mine and completing the reclamation activities. The Government of Yukon will determine the amount and form of security to be provided.

PEA CONTRIBUTORS


--  JDS Energy & Mining Inc., Lead Author, Overall Mine and Project Design 
--  Knight Piesold and Co., Heap Leach Facility Design 
--  Sim Geological, Mineral Resource Estimate (January 2014) 
--  Kappes Cassidy and Associates, Metallurgical Consultants 

Qualified Persons

Fred Lightner, PE, Kaminak Director of Mine Development, is the Company's designated QP for this news release within the meaning of NI 43-101 and has reviewed and validated that the information contained in the release is consistent with that provided by the QPs responsible for the PEA.

Kaminak's disclosure of technical or scientific information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Tim Smith, MSc, P.Geo., Vice President Exploration of Kaminak Gold Corporation, who serves as a Qualified Person under the definition of National Instrument 43-101.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Kaminak

Eira Thomas, President and CEO

Kaminak Gold Corporation

For further information about Kaminak Gold Corporation or this news release, please visit our website at www.kaminak.com.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain disclosures in this release, including management's assessment of the future potential of the Coffee Project and future exploration programs, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to Kaminak's operations as a mineral exploration company that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements, including risks as to the completion of the plans and projects. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, Kaminak expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

The Company has not made a production decision and the Company's strategic plan to develop a stand-alone heap leach operation is subject to the results of its Feasibility Study. Further, if and when the Company makes any production decision, it will disclose the basis of such decision in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").

Cautionary Note concerning estimates of Inferred and Indicated Resources:

This news release uses the terms "Inferred Resources" and "Indicated Resources", which have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred and/or Indicated Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. Kaminak advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an Inferred and Indicated resource exists, or is economically or legally minable.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.
"There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The major cloud platforms defy a simple, side-by-side analysis. Each of the major IaaS public-cloud platforms offers their own unique strengths and functionality. Options for on-site private cloud are diverse as well, and must be designed and deployed while taking existing legacy architecture and infrastructure into account. Then the reality is that most enterprises are embarking on a hybrid cloud strategy and programs. In this Power Panel at 15th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), moderated by Ashar Baig, Research Director, Cloud, at Gigaom Research, Nate Gordon, Director of T...