Welcome!

Microsoft Cloud Authors: Andreas Grabner, Stackify Blog, Liz McMillan, David H Deans, Automic Blog

News Feed Item

Cincinnati Bell Reports First Quarter 2014 Results

Cincinnati Bell Inc. (NYSE:CBB) today announced financial results for the first quarter of 2014, highlighted by year-over-year growth in both Wireline revenue and Adjusted EBITDA1. Customer demand for strategic products generated revenue of $101 million from these products, more than offsetting wireless and legacy product declines.

“We are excited about our first quarter results. The momentum created from our strategic investments is accelerating and for the first time in more than a decade we generated year-over-year growth in both Wireline revenue and Adjusted EBITDA," said Ted Torbeck, president and chief executive officer. Torbeck also added, "The agreement to sell our Wireless spectrum is a significant milestone in our efforts to transform Cincinnati Bell into a healthy fiber based entertainment, communications and IT Solutions company with growing revenue, growing profits and significant cash flows."

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS2

Consolidated revenue for the first quarter of 2014 was $323 million, up $12 million from the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $106 million, up $1 million after excluding mark-to-market adjustments on compensation plans indexed to changes in our stock price. Operating income for the quarter totaled $57 million and net income of $7 million resulted in earnings per share ("EPS") of $0.02.

Wireline Segment

  • Wireline revenue for the quarter totaled $184 million, up 2 percent compared to the prior year.

    • Fioptics revenue for the quarter was $31 million, up 43 percent from the prior year.
    • Strategic revenue for business customers totaled $40 million for the quarter, up 14 percent compared to the prior year.
  • Operating income was $53 million in the quarter, up 5 percent from a year ago.
  • Adjusted EBITDA totaled $85 million for the quarter, up 1 percent from the same period in 2013.
  • Fioptics video subscribers totaled 77,500 at the end of the first quarter, up 35 percent compared to the same period in 2013.
  • Fioptics internet subscribers totaled 91,600, adding 5,900 new Fioptics high-speed internet subscribers in the quarter.
  • In the first quarter of 2014, we passed an additional 12,000 units with Fioptics which is available to approximately 36 percent of Greater Cincinnati.

IT Services and Hardware Segment

  • Revenue of $102 million for the quarter was up 21 percent over the prior year.

    • Strategic managed and professional services revenue was $33 million in the quarter, up 22 percent compared to the prior year.
    • Hardware revenue was $68 million for the quarter, up 19 percent year-over-year.
  • Operating income totaled $5 million for the quarter, compared to $2 million a year ago.
  • Adjusted EBITDA was $8 million for the quarter, compared to $4 million in the first quarter of 2013.

Wireless Segment

  • Revenue was $45 million for the quarter, down 16 percent from the prior year.
  • Operating income totaled $5 million in the quarter, compared to $1 million a year ago.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of $18 million in the quarter was down 13 percent compared to the same period a year ago.
  • Wireless subscribers totaled 320,000 at the end of the quarter, down 17 percent compared to the first quarter of 2013.

Investment in CyrusOne

  • Cincinnati Bell effectively owns 68 percent of CyrusOne, which is accounted for as an equity method investment.
  • Investment in CyrusOne valued at $927 million as of March 31, 2014.
  • CyrusOne reported revenue of $78 million for the first quarter of 2014, up 29 percent compared to the prior year
  • CyrusOne's first quarter of 2014 Adjusted EBITDA totaled $42 million, up 32 percent compared to a year ago.

2014 Outlook

Cincinnati Bell reaffirms its financial guidance for 2014:

Category           2014 Guidance
Revenue           $1.2 billion
Adjusted EBITDA           $383 million*

*Plus or minus 2 percent

Conference Call/Webcast

Cincinnati Bell will host a conference call on May 8 at 10:00 a.m. (ET) to discuss its results for the first quarter of 2014. A live webcast of the call will be available via the Investor Relations section of www.cincinnatibell.com. The conference call dial-in number is (866) 863-7412. Callers located outside of the U.S. and Canada may dial (816) 581-1570. A taped replay of the conference call will be available one hour after the conclusion of the call until 10:00 a.m. on Thursday May 22, 2014. For U.S. callers, the replay will be available at (888) 203-1112. For callers outside of the U.S. and Canada, the replay will be available at (719) 457-0820. The replay reference number is 6995132. An archived version of the webcast will also be available in the Investor Relations section of www.cincinnatibell.com.

Safe Harbor Note

This release and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “predicts,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “continues,” “endeavors,” “strives,” “may,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned these forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this release and those discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). More information on potential risks and uncertainties is available in our recent filings with the SEC, including Cincinnati Bell's Form 10-K report, Form 10-Q reports and Form 8-K reports. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This press release contains information about adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA), Adjusted EBITDA margin, net debt, net income excluding special items, free cash flow and excludes CyrusOne from our 2013 operating results. These are non-GAAP financial measures used by Cincinnati Bell management when evaluating results of operations and cash flow. Management believes these measures also provide users of the financial statements with additional and useful comparisons of current results of operations and cash flows with past and future periods. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be construed as being more important than comparable GAAP measures. Detailed reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to comparable GAAP financial measures have been included in the tables distributed with this release and are available in the Investor Relations section of www.cincinnatibell.com.

1Adjusted EBITDA provides a useful measure of operational performance. The company defines Adjusted EBITDA as GAAP operating income plus depreciation, amortization, transaction-related compensation, restructuring charges, (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets (net), amortization of deferred gain, asset impairments, transaction costs, components of pension and other retirement plan costs related to interest costs, asset returns, and amortization of actuarial gains and losses, and other special items. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to comparable GAAP measures of profitability and may not be comparable with the measure as defined by other companies.

CyrusOne defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) as defined by U.S. GAAP before noncontrolling interests plus interest expense, income tax (benefit) expense, depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation, transaction costs and transaction-related compensation, including acquisition pursuit costs, restructuring costs, loss on extinguishment of debt, asset impairments, (gain) loss on sale of real estate improvements, and other special items. Other companies may not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner. Accordingly, CyrusOne's Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to others. Detailed reconciliations of CyrusOne's Adjusted EBITDA to the comparable GAAP financial measure are available in the Investor Relations section of www.cyrusone.com.

2Consolidated Results for the first quarter of 2013 include CyrusOne's results of operations from January 1, 2013 through January 23, 2013. On January 24, 2013, the Company successfully completed the initial public offering ("IPO") of CyrusOne and no longer consolidates its results, but accounts for CyrusOne as an equity method investment. The first quarter 2013 results referenced within the Consolidated Results section exclude the operations of CyrusOne for the period January 1, 2013 through January 23, 2013, to effectively provide comparative results. Excluding CyrusOne results for this period is not consistent with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to comparable GAAP measures of revenue, operating income, or profitability.

Adjusted EBITDA margin provides a useful measure of operational performance. The company defines Adjusted EBITDA margin as Adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue. Adjusted EBITDA margin should not be considered as an alternative to comparable GAAP measures of profitability and may not be comparable with the measure as defined by other companies.

Free cash flow provides a useful measure of operational performance, liquidity and financial health. The company defines free cash flow as cash provided by (used in) operating, financing and investing activities, adjusted for the issuance and repayment of debt, debt issuance costs, the repurchase of common stock, and the proceeds from the sale or the use of funds from the purchase of business operations, including transaction costs. Free cash flow should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), operating income (loss), cash flow from operating activities, or the change in cash on the balance sheet and may not be comparable with free cash flow as defined by other companies. Although the company feels that there is no comparable GAAP measure for free cash flow, the attached financial information reconciles free cash flow to the net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.

Net debt provides a useful measure of liquidity and financial health. The company defines net debt as the sum of the face amount of short-term and long-term debt and unamortized premium and/or discount, offset by cash and cash equivalents.

Net income excluding special items in total and per share provides a useful measure of operating performance. Net income excluding special items should not be considered as an alternative to comparable GAAP measures of profitability and may not be comparable with net income excluding special items as defined by other companies.

About Cincinnati Bell Inc.

With headquarters in Cincinnati, Ohio, Cincinnati Bell (NYSE: CBB) provides integrated communications solutions - including local and long distance voice, data, high-speed internet, entertainment and wireless services - that keep residential and business customers in Greater Cincinnati and Dayton connected with each other and with the world. In addition, enterprise customers across the United States rely on Cincinnati Bell for efficient, scalable office communications systems and end-to-end IT solutions. Cincinnati Bell also is the majority owner of CyrusOne (NASDAQ: CONE), which provides best-in-class data center colocation services to enterprise customers through its facilities with fully redundant power and cooling solutions that are currently located in the Midwest, Texas, Arizona, London and Singapore. For more information, please visit www.cincinnatibell.com.

 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
             
Three Months Ended
March 31, Change
2014 2013 $

%

 
Revenue $ 322.5 $ 325.7 $ (3.2 ) (1 )%
 
Costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 166.2 162.4 3.8 2 %
Selling, general and administrative 55.4 53.1 2.3 4 %
Depreciation and amortization 46.9 50.6 (3.7 ) (7 )%
Transaction-related compensation 35.5 (35.5 ) n/m
Restructuring charges 2.6 (2.6 ) n/m
Loss on sale or disposal of assets, net 2.5 (2.5 ) n/m
Amortization of deferred gain (3.6 ) (0.6 ) (3.0 ) n/m
Transaction costs   0.7     0.4     0.3   75 %
 
Operating income 56.9 19.2 37.7 n/m
 
Interest expense 40.3 47.9 (7.6 ) (16 )%
(Income) loss from CyrusOne equity method investment (0.5 ) 1.9 (2.4 ) n/m
Other expense (income), net   0.6     (0.3 )   0.9   n/m
 
Income (loss) before income taxes 16.5 (30.3 ) 46.8 n/m
Income tax expense   9.5     6.4     3.1   48 %
 
Net income (loss) 7.0 (36.7 ) 43.7 n/m
 
Preferred stock dividends   2.6     2.6      

0

%

 
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareowners $ 4.4   $ (39.3 ) $ 43.7   n/m
 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.02   $ (0.19 )
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding

(in millions)

- Basic 208.0 202.8
- Diluted 209.0 202.8
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Income Statements by Segment
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
           
Three Months Ended
March 31, Change
2014 2013 $ %
Wireline
Revenue
Data $ 83.0 $ 78.1 $ 4.9 6 %
Voice - local service 53.1 59.5 (6.4 ) (11 )%
Long distance and VoIP 26.9 26.9

0

%
Entertainment 17.0 12.0 5.0 42 %
Other   3.6     3.2   0.4   13 %
 
Total revenue   183.6     179.7   3.9   2 %
 
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 71.9 71.2 0.7 1 %
Selling, general and administrative 31.1 31.0 0.1 0 %
Depreciation and amortization 28.1 26.8 1.3 5 %
Other*   (0.1 )   0.6   (0.7 ) n/m
 
Total operating costs and expenses   131.0     129.6   1.4   1 %
 
Operating income $ 52.6   $ 50.1 $ 2.5   5 %
 
IT Services and Hardware
Revenue
Telecom and IT equipment distribution $ 67.9 $ 56.9 $ 11.0 19 %
Managed and professional services   34.0     27.6   6.4   23 %
 
Total revenue   101.9     84.5   17.4   21 %
 
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 81.7 69.4 12.3 18 %
Selling, general and administrative 12.0 10.7 1.3 12 %
Depreciation and amortization   2.8     2.5   0.3   12 %
 
Total operating costs and expenses   96.5     82.6   13.9   17 %
 
Operating income $ 5.4   $ 1.9 $ 3.5   n/m
 
Wireless
Revenue
Service $ 41.7 $ 49.3 $ (7.6 ) (15 )%
Equipment   3.0     4.0   (1.0 ) (25 )%
 
Total revenue   44.7     53.3   (8.6 ) (16 )%
 
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 19.5 24.1 (4.6 ) (19 )%
Selling, general and administrative 7.7 9.8 (2.1 ) (21 )%
Depreciation and amortization 15.8 16.0 (0.2 ) (1 )%
Other*   (3.6 )   2.7   (6.3 ) n/m
 
Total operating costs and expenses   39.4     52.6   (13.2 ) (25 )%
 
Operating income $ 5.3   $ 0.7 $ 4.6   n/m
 
Data Center Colocation**
Revenue $   $ 15.6 $ (15.6 ) n/m
 
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of services 4.8 (4.8 ) n/m
Selling, general and administrative 2.4 (2.4 ) n/m
Depreciation and amortization       5.2   (5.2 ) n/m
 
Total operating costs and expenses       12.4   (12.4 ) n/m
 
Operating income $   $ 3.2 $ (3.2 ) n/m
 
*Other includes restructuring charges, loss (gain) on sale or disposal of assets, net and amortization of deferred gain.
 
**Results for 2013 only include CyrusOne's results through January 23, 2013. Effective January 24, 2013, the date of completion of CyrusOne's IPO, the Company accounts for CyrusOne as an equity method investment, and therefore does not consolidate the CyrusOne results of operations in the total company or segment results.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Segment Information
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
      Three Months Ended    
March 31, Change
2014   2013 $ %
Revenue
Wireline $ 183.6 $ 179.7 $ 3.9 2 %
IT Services and Hardware 101.9 84.5 17.4 21 %
Wireless 44.7 53.3 (8.6 ) (16 )%
Data Center Colocation** 15.6 (15.6 ) n/m
Eliminations   (7.7 )   (7.4 )   (0.3 ) (4 )%
 
Total revenue $ 322.5   $ 325.7   $ (3.2 ) (1 )%
 
Cost of Services and Products
Wireline $ 71.9 $ 71.2 $ 0.7 1 %
IT Services and Hardware 81.7 69.4 12.3 18 %
Wireless 19.5 24.1 (4.6 ) (19 )%
Data Center Colocation** 4.8 (4.8 ) n/m
Eliminations   (6.9 )   (7.1 )   0.2   3 %
 
Total cost of services and products $ 166.2   $ 162.4   $ 3.8   2 %
 
Selling, General and Administrative
Wireline $ 31.1 $ 31.0 $ 0.1 0 %
IT Services and Hardware 12.0 10.7 1.3 12 %
Wireless 7.7 9.8 (2.1 ) (21 )%
Data Center Colocation** 2.4 (2.4 ) n/m
Corporate and eliminations   4.6     (0.8 )   5.4   n/m
 
Total selling, general and administrative $ 55.4   $ 53.1   $ 2.3   4 %
 
Depreciation and Amortization
Wireline $ 28.1 $ 26.8 $ 1.3 5 %
IT Services and Hardware 2.8 2.5 0.3 12 %
Wireless 15.8 16.0 (0.2 ) (1 )%
Data Center Colocation** 5.2 (5.2 ) n/m
Corporate   0.2     0.1     0.1   n/m
 
Total depreciation and amortization $ 46.9   $ 50.6   $ (3.7 ) (7 )%
 
Other*
Wireline $ (0.1 ) $ 0.6 $ (0.7 ) n/m
IT Services and Hardware n/m
Wireless (3.6 ) 2.7 (6.3 ) n/m
Data Center Colocation** n/m
Corporate   0.8     37.1     (36.3 ) (98 )%
 
Total other $ (2.9 ) $ 40.4   $ (43.3 ) n/m
 
Operating Income
Wireline $ 52.6 $ 50.1 $ 2.5 5 %
IT Services and Hardware 5.4 1.9 3.5 n/m
Wireless 5.3 0.7 4.6 n/m
Data Center Colocation** 3.2 (3.2 ) n/m
Corporate   (6.4 )   (36.7 )   30.3   (83 )%
 
Total operating income $ 56.9   $ 19.2   $ 37.7   n/m
 
*Other includes transaction-related compensation, restructuring charges, loss (gain) on sale or disposal of assets, net, amortization of deferred gain and transaction costs.
 
**Results for 2013 only include CyrusOne's results through January 23, 2013. Effective January 24, 2013, the date of completion of CyrusOne's IPO, the Company accounts for CyrusOne as an equity method investment, and therefore does not consolidate the CyrusOne results of operations in the total company or segment results.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Segment Metric Information
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
                       
March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,
2014 2013 2013 2013 2013
 
Local access lines
Residential 263.5 271.4 278.1 284.9 292.5
Business 255.3 259.3 263.1 265.1 268.9
 
518.8 530.7 541.2 550.0 561.4
 
Long distance lines 386.9 394.1 400.8 406.5 410.4
 
Internet subscribers
DSL 178.4 188.5 191.3 194.9 199.5
Fioptics 91.6 79.9 74.3 66.8 60.7
 
270.0 268.4 265.6 261.7 260.2
 

Fioptics video subscribers

77.5 74.2 69.7 63.2 57.6
 
Fioptics units passed 288.0 276.0 258.0 238.0 220.0
 
Wireless
Postpaid wireless subscribers 183.6 197.4 209.4 223.1 236.6
Prepaid wireless subscribers 136.2 142.3 145.8 146.9 148.7
319.8 339.7 355.2 370.0 385.3
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Net Debt and Common Shares Outstanding
(Unaudited)
(Dollars and shares in millions)
         
March 31, December 31,
2014 2013
 
Corporate Credit Agreement $ 37.5 $ 40.0
Receivables Facility 104.6 106.2
8 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 625.0 625.0
Corporate Credit Agreement - Tranche B Term Loan 537.3 538.6
8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2020 683.9 683.9
7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023 40.0 40.0
Various Cincinnati Bell Telephone notes 134.5 134.5
Capital leases and other debt 99.4 103.3
Net unamortized discount   (6.0 )   (6.3 )
 
Total debt 2,256.2 2,265.2
 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents   (4.2 )   (4.6 )
 
Net debt (as defined by the company) $ 2,252.0   $ 2,260.6  
 
 
Corporate Credit Agreement availability $ 162.5   $ 160.0  
 
Common shares outstanding   208.8     208.2  
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) to Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
       
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Wireline  

IT Services &
Hardware

  Wireless  

Data Center
Colocation*

  Corporate   Total

Company

 
Net Income (GAAP) $ 7.0
Add:
Income tax expense 9.5
Interest expense 40.3
Income from CyrusOne equity method investment (0.5 )
Other expense, net   0.6  
 
Operating Income (GAAP) $ 52.6 $ 5.4 $ 5.3 $ $ (6.4 ) $ 56.9
Add:
Depreciation and amortization 28.1 2.8 15.8 0.2 46.9
Amortization of deferred gain (3.6 ) (3.6 )
(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets (0.1 ) 0.1
Transaction costs 0.7 0.7
Pension and other retirement plan expenses   4.5                 0.4     4.9  
 
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) $ 85.1   $ 8.2   $ 17.5   $   $ (5.0 ) $ 105.8  
 
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 46 % 8 % 39 %

 

 

 

33 %
                     
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Wireline

IT Services &
Hardware

Wireless

Data Center
Colocation*

Corporate Total

Company

 
Net Loss (GAAP) $ (36.7 )
Add:
Income tax expense 6.4
Interest expense 47.9
Loss from CyrusOne equity method investment 1.9
Other income, net   (0.3 )
 
Operating Income (GAAP) $ 50.1 $ 1.9 $ 0.7 $ 3.2 $ (36.7 ) $ 19.2
Add:
Depreciation and amortization 26.8 2.5 16.0 5.2 0.1 50.6
Transaction-related compensation 35.5 35.5
Restructuring charges 1.4 1.2 2.6
Loss (gain) on sale or disposal of assets (0.8 ) 3.3 2.5
Transaction costs 0.4 0.4
Pension and other retirement plan expenses   6.9                 0.4     7.3  
 
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) $ 84.4   $ 4.4   $ 20.0   $ 8.4   $ 0.9   $ 118.1  
 
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 47 % 5 % 38 % 54 %

 

36 %
 
Year-over-year dollar change in Adjusted EBITDA $ 0.7 $ 3.8 $ (2.5 ) $ (8.4 ) $ (5.9 ) $ (12.3 )
 
Year-over-year percentage change in Adjusted EBITDA 1 % 86 % (13 )% n/m n/m (10 )%
 
*Results for 2013 only include CyrusOne's results through January 23, 2013. Effective January 24, 2013, the date of completion of CyrusOne's IPO, the Company accounts for CyrusOne as an equity method investment, and therefore does not consolidate the CyrusOne results of operations in the total company or segment results.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
       
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2014 2013
 
Cash provided by operating activities $ 37.8   $ 42.3  
 
Capital expenditures (34.3 ) (50.9 )
Dividends received from CyrusOne 7.1
Proceeds from sale of assets 1.9 0.8
Release of restricted cash 0.4
Cash divested from deconsolidation of CyrusOne       (12.2 )
 
Cash used in investing activities   (25.3 )   (61.9 )
 

Net (decrease) increase in corporate credit and receivables facilities with initial maturities less than 90 days

(4.1 ) 2.0
Repayment of debt (5.2 ) (3.1 )
Dividends paid on preferred stock (2.6 ) (2.6 )
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants 0.6 6.6
Other, net   (1.6 )   (1.8 )
 
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities   (12.9 )   1.1  
 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (0.4 ) (18.5 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   4.6     23.6  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 4.2   $ 5.1  
 
 

Reconciliation of GAAP Cash Flow to Free Cash Flow (as defined by the company)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (0.4 ) $ (18.5 )
Less adjustments:

Net (decrease) increase in corporate credit and receivables facilities with initial maturities less than 90 days

4.1 (2.0 )
Cash divested from deconsolidation of CyrusOne 12.2
Repayment of debt 5.2 3.1
Transaction-related compensation 2.0
Transaction costs       0.4  
 
Free cash flow 8.9 (2.8 )
 
Less: CyrusOne's free cash flows*       (3.3 )
Free cash flow excluding CyrusOne $ 8.9   $ 0.5  
 
Income tax (refunds) payments $ (0.9 ) $ 1.8  
 
*CyrusOne's free cash flows for 2013 were comprised of cash generated from operating activities of $4.0 million and cash used in investing activities of $7.3 million.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Free Cash Flow (as defined by the company)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
   
 
Free Cash Flow for the three months ended March 31, 2013 $ (2.8 )
Less: CyrusOne's free cash flows   (3.3 )
Free Cash Flow for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (excluding CyrusOne)* 0.5
 
Decrease in Adjusted EBITDA (excluding CyrusOne)* (3.9 )
Decrease in capital expenditures (excluding CyrusOne)* 8.9
Increase in interest payments (5.6 )
Decrease in pension and postretirement payments and contributions 0.4
Change in working capital and other 8.6
 
Free Cash Flow for the three months ended March 31, 2014 $ 8.9  
 
*CyrusOne's Adjusted EBITDA and capital expenditures totaled $8.4 million and $7.7 million, respectively for the period January 1, 2013 through January 23, 2013. Effective January 24, 2013, the date of completion of CyrusOne's IPO, the Company accounts for CyrusOne as an equity method investment, and therefore does not consolidate the CyrusOne results of operations in the total company or segment results.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Capital Expenditures
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
                     
 
Three Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014 Dec. 31, 2013 Sep. 30, 2013 Jun. 30, 2013 Mar. 31, 2013
 
Wireline $ 26.2 $ 48.3 $ 41.2 $ 39.3 $ 33.8
IT Services and Hardware 2.5 3.0 2.7 3.7 1.2
Wireless 5.6 3.6 2.2 2.0 8.2
Data Center Colocation*           7.7
Total capital expenditures $ 34.3 $ 54.9 $ 46.1 $ 45.0 $ 50.9
 
*Results for 2013 only include CyrusOne's results through January 23, 2013. Effective January 24, 2013, the date of completion of CyrusOne's IPO, the Company accounts for CyrusOne as an equity method investment, and therefore does not consolidate the CyrusOne results of operations in the total company or segment results.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Normalized Statements of Operations (Non-GAAP) - Reconciliation to Reported Results
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
           
 
Three
Three Months Ended
Months Ended March 31, 2014
March 31, 2014 Before Special Items
(GAAP) Special Items (Non-GAAP)
 
Revenue $ 322.5 $ $ 322.5
 
Costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 166.2 166.2
Selling, general and administrative 55.4 55.4
Depreciation and amortization 46.9 (9.0 ) [A] 37.9
Amortization of deferred gain (3.6 ) 3.0 [A] (0.6 )
Transaction costs   0.7     (0.7 ) [B]    
Operating income 56.9 6.7 63.6
 
Interest expense 40.3 40.3
Income from CyrusOne equity method investment (0.5 ) (0.5 )
Other expense, net   0.6         0.6  
 
Income before income taxes 16.5 6.7 23.2
Income tax expense   9.5     2.7     12.2  
 
Net income 7.0 4.0 11.0
 
Preferred stock dividends   2.6         2.6  
 
Net income applicable to common shareowners $ 4.4   $ 4.0   $ 8.4  
 
 
Weighted average diluted common shares   209.0     209.0     209.0  
 
Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.02   $ 0.02   $ 0.04  
 
  Normalized results have been adjusted for the following (pretax adjustments are tax effected at 40%):
 
A Increased depreciation expense and amortization of deferred gain due to change in estimated useful life of wireless assets to no more than 30 months as of December 31, 2013.
 
B Transaction costs relate to expenses incurred for agreement to sell wireless spectrum licenses and certain other assets.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Normalized Statements of Operations (Non-GAAP) - Reconciliation to Reported Results
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
           
 
Three
Three Months Ended
Months Ended March 31, 2013
March 31, 2013 Before Special Items
(GAAP) Special Items (Non-GAAP)
 
Revenue $ 325.7 $ $ 325.7
 
Costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 162.4 162.4
Selling, general and administrative 53.1 53.1
Depreciation and amortization 50.6 (8.5 ) [A] 42.1
Transaction-related compensation 35.5 (35.5 ) [B]
Restructuring charges 2.6 (2.6 ) [C]
Loss on sale or disposal of assets, net 2.5 (2.5 ) [D]
Amortization of deferred gain (0.6 ) (0.6 )
Transaction costs   0.4     (0.4 ) [E]    
Operating income 19.2 49.5 68.7
 
Interest expense 47.9 47.9
Loss from CyrusOne equity method investment 1.9 1.9
Other income, net   (0.3 )       (0.3 )
 
(Loss) income before income taxes (30.3 ) 49.5 19.2
Income tax expense   6.4     9.1   [F]   15.5  
 
Net (loss) income (36.7 ) 40.4 3.7
 
Preferred stock dividends   2.6         2.6  
 
Net (loss) income applicable to common shareowners $ (39.3 ) $ 40.4   $ 1.1  
 
 
Weighted average diluted common shares   202.8     207.9   [G]   207.9  
 
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share* $ (0.19 ) $ 0.19   $ 0.01  
 
  Normalized results have been adjusted for the following (pretax adjustments are tax effected at 40%):
 
A Increased depreciation due to change in the estimated useful lives assigned to wireless network software.
 
B Transaction-related compensation represents incentives earned upon completion of CyrusOne's initial public offering.
 
C Restructuring charges consist of severance and lease abandonments.
 
D Loss on sale or disposal of wireline and wireless network equipment.
 
E Transaction costs consist of legal and consulting fees incurred in legal entity restructuring.
 
F Tax effect of above adjustments at 40%, partially offset by a gross valuation allowance provision of $10.7 million for Texas margin tax credits.
 
G Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents based on net income excluding special items.
 
* Diluted earnings per common share have been calculated independently for the results above. Therefore, the sum of the per share amounts will not necessarily equal the per share results for the Before Special Items (Non-GAAP) results.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Operating Income excluding CyrusOne
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
             
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2013
 
Cincinnati Bell Cincinnati Bell
including Data Center excluding
CyrusOne Colocation Other CyrusOne
 
Revenue $ 325.7 (15.6 ) 0.4 [A] $ 310.5
 
Costs and expenses
Cost of services and products 162.4 (4.8 ) 0.4 [A] 158.0
Selling, general and administrative 53.1 (2.4 ) 50.7
Depreciation and amortization 50.6 (5.2 ) 45.4
Transaction-related compensation 35.5 (20.0 ) [B] 15.5
Restructuring charges 2.6 2.6
Loss on sale or disposal of assets, net 2.5 2.5
Amortization of deferred gain (0.6 ) (0.6 )
Transaction costs   0.4     (0.4 ) [C]    
Operating income $ 19.2   (3.2 ) 20.4   $ 36.4  
 
A   Represents intersegment transactions.
B Transaction-related compensation paid to CyrusOne related to CyrusOne employees.
C Transaction costs related to the CyrusOne IPO.
 
 
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Reconciliation of Operating Income (GAAP) Guidance to Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Guidance
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
     
 
 
2014 Operating Income (GAAP) Guidance $ 143
 
Add:
 
Depreciation and amortization 240
Amortization of deferred gain (20 )
Pension and other retirement plan expenses   20  
 
2014 Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) Guidance $ 383  
 

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Multiple data types are pouring into IoT deployments. Data is coming in small packages as well as enormous files and data streams of many sizes. Widespread use of mobile devices adds to the total. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists looked at the tools and environments that are being put to use in IoT deployments, as well as the team skills a modern enterprise IT shop needs to keep things running, get a handle on all this data, and deliver...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural networks. We’re in the midst of a wave of excitement around AI such as hasn’t been seen for a few decades. But those previous periods of inflated expectations led to troughs of disappointment. Will this time be different? Most likely. Applications of AI such as predictive analytics are already decreasing costs and improving reliability of industrial machinery. Furthermore, the funding and research going into AI now comes from a wide range of com...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 21st Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound change in personal and enterprise IT since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago. All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devic...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a client-oriented software development company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software company that develops and delivers turn-key mobile apps, websites, web services, and complex software systems for startups and enterprises. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business...
SYS-CON Events announced today that GrapeUp, the leading provider of rapid product development at the speed of business, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Grape Up is a software company, specialized in cloud native application development and professional services related to Cloud Foundry PaaS. With five expert teams that operate in various sectors of the market acr...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Ayehu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on October 31 - November 2, 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara California. Ayehu provides IT Process Automation & Orchestration solutions for IT and Security professionals to identify and resolve critical incidents and enable rapid containment, eradication, and recovery from cyber security breaches. Ayehu provides customers greater control over IT infras...
In this presentation, Striim CTO and founder Steve Wilkes will discuss practical strategies for counteracting fraud and cyberattacks by leveraging real-time streaming analytics. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Steve Wilkes, Founder and Chief Technology Officer at Striim, will provide a detailed look into leveraging streaming data management to correlate events in real time, and identify potential breaches across IoT and non-IoT systems throughout the enterprise. Strategies for processing massive ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Cloud Academy named "Bronze Sponsor" of 21st International Cloud Expo which will take place October 31 - November 2, 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Cloud Academy is the industry’s most innovative, vendor-neutral cloud technology training platform. Cloud Academy provides continuous learning solutions for individuals and enterprise teams for Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and the most popular cloud com...
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, an entertainment executive/TV producer turned serial entrepreneur, presented a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to ma...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st Int\ernational Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive advantage. By offering a suite of proven hosting and management services, Enzu wants companies to focus on the core of their ...