Welcome!

.NET Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Trevor Parsons, Peter Silva

News Feed Item

Insulet Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2012 Results

Company Achieves Operating Cashflow Profitability for Q4

BEDFORD, MA -- (Marketwire) -- 02/27/13 -- Insulet Corporation (NASDAQ: PODD), the leader in tubeless insulin pump technology with its OmniPod® Insulin Management System, today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2012.

Fourth Quarter Results

Fourth quarter 2012 revenue increased 23% to $57.8 million, compared to $47.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2012 improved by 26% to $25.3 million, as compared to a gross profit of $20.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2011. The increase in both revenue and gross profit was driven by continued growth of the OmniPod customer base both in the U.S. and international markets during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Operating loss for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $6.1 million, compared to an operating loss of $10.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, an improvement of over 40%. The decrease in the operating loss is mainly driven by the increase in gross profit quarter over quarter.

Net loss for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $10.2 million, or $0.21 per share, compared to a net loss of $14.3 million, or $0.30 per share, for the fourth quarter of 2011.

"2012 was an extremely successful year across all fronts for Insulet, with strong revenue growth and expanded gross margins driving us to operating cash profitability* in the fourth quarter," said Duane DeSisto, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insulet. "The year culminated with our most exciting accomplishment, FDA clearance of the new OmniPod. We have begun shipping the new OmniPod to new customers and expect to begin transitioning our existing customer base to the new OmniPod in the coming weeks. Looking ahead to 2013, we expect continued growth to be driven by robust demand for the new OmniPod, which retains all the easy-to-use features of the original OmniPod, and is over a third smaller in size and a quarter lighter."

Full Year Results

For the year ended December 31, 2012, revenue increased 39% to $211.4 million from $152.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $92.3 million, an improvement of 38%, as compared to a gross profit of $66.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $36.0 million as compared to an operating loss of $42.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. Total operating expenses were $128.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $109.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase in operating expenses was primarily related to the June 2011 acquisition of Neighborhood Diabetes, the expansion of our commercial team and higher research and development costs associated with the development and approval of our next generation OmniPod.

Net interest expense was $15.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Income tax expense was $0.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to income tax benefit of $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Income tax expense in 2012 primarily related to federal, state and foreign taxes. Income tax benefit in 2011 primarily resulted from acquired deferred tax liabilities which were used to offset preexisting deferred tax assets and reduced the amount of the valuation allowance required.

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $51.9 million, or $1.08 per share, compared to $45.8 million, or $0.98 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $57.3 million compared to $94.0 million at December 31, 2011. In January 2013, the Company sold approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock at $20.75 per share and received net proceeds of approximately $92.8 million.

Guidance
For the year ending December 31, 2013, the Company estimates that revenue will be in the range of $240 to $255 million. For the first quarter ending March 31, 2013, the Company expects that revenue will be in the range of $56 to $59 million.

Conference Call
Insulet will host a conference call on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 5:00PM Eastern time to discuss the Company's fourth quarter and full year 2012 results and present information concerning its business, strategies and outlook. To listen to the conference call, please dial (877) 831-5664 for domestic callers and (832) 412-1780 for international callers. The passcode is 98386780. A replay of the conference call will be available two hours after the start of the call through March 27, 2013 by dialing (855) 859-2056 (domestic) or (404) 537-3406 (international), passcode 98386780. An online archive of the conference call will also be available by accessing the Investor Information section of the company's website at http://investors.insulet.com.

* Operating cash profitability is defined as operating loss plus certain non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation.

About Insulet Corporation
Insulet Corporation is an innovative medical device company dedicated to making the lives of people with diabetes easier. Through its OmniPod Insulin Management System, Insulet seeks to expand the use of insulin pump therapy among people with insulin-dependent diabetes. The OmniPod is a revolutionary and easy-to-use tubeless insulin pump that features just two parts and fully-automated cannula insertion. Founded in 2000, Insulet Corporation is based in Bedford, Mass. For more information, please visit: http://www.myomnipod.com.

Forward-Looking Statement
The 2012 financial results contained in this news release are subject to finalization in connection with the preparation of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. This press release contains forward-looking statements concerning Insulet's expectations, anticipations, intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the future, including those related to its expected revenue, the future operations of the Neighborhood Diabetes business, planned expansion in the U.S. and abroad, particularly with respect to its agreement with Ypsomed, product demand, the impact of the OmniPod System on the insulin pump market, regulatory matters and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are based on its current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on Insulet. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting Insulet will be those that it has anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond its control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: risks associated with the Company's dependence on the OmniPod System; Insulet's ability to increase customer orders and manufacturing volumes; adverse changes in general economic conditions; impact of healthcare reform legislation; risks related to the implementation of a national mail-order competitive bid program; Insulet's inability to raise additional funds in the future on acceptable terms or at all; potential supply problems or price fluctuations with sole source or other third-party suppliers on which Insulet is dependent; failure by Insulet to retain supplier pricing discounts and achieve satisfactory gross margins; failure by Insulet to retain key supplier and payor partners; international business risks; Insulet's inability to obtain adequate coverage or reimbursement from third-party payors for the OmniPod System and potential adverse changes in reimbursement rates or policies relating to the OmniPod System; failure to retain key partner payors and their members; failure to retain and manage successfully Insulet's Medicare and Medicaid business; potential adverse effects resulting from competition with competitors; technological innovations adversely affecting the Company's business; potential termination of Insulet's license to incorporate a blood glucose meter into the OmniPod System; Insulet's ability to protect its intellectual property and other proprietary rights; conflicts with the intellectual property of third parties, including claims that Insulet's current or future products infringe the proprietary rights of others; adverse regulatory or legal actions relating to the OmniPod System; failure of Insulet's contract manufacturers or component suppliers to comply with FDA's quality system regulations, the potential violation of federal or state laws prohibiting "kickbacks" or protecting patient health information, or any challenges to or investigations into Insulet's practices under these laws; product liability lawsuits that may be brought against Insulet; reduced retention rates; unfavorable results of clinical studies relating to the OmniPod System or the products of Insulet's competitors; potential future publication of articles or announcement of positions by physician associations or other organizations that are unfavorable to Insulet's products; the expansion, or attempted expansion, into foreign markets; the concentration of substantially all of Insulet's manufacturing capacity at a single location in China and substantially all of Insulet's inventory at a single location in Massachusetts; Insulet's ability to attract and retain key personnel; Insulet's ability to manage its growth; failure to integrate successfully the Neighborhood Diabetes business; intense competition among distributors of diabetes supplies impairing Neighborhood Diabetes' business; loss by Neighborhood Diabetes of an opportunity to sell insulin pumps supplied by Insulet's competitors; failure by Neighborhood Diabetes to retain key supplier and payor partners; failure by Neighborhood Diabetes to retain supplier pricing discounts and achieve satisfactory gross margins; failure by Neighborhood Diabetes to retain and manage successfully its Medicare and Medicaid business; existence of unanticipated liabilities arising in connection with the Neighborhood Diabetes business; fluctuations in quarterly results of operations; risks associated with potential future acquisitions; the costs associated with the acquisition of Neighborhood Diabetes; Insulet's ability to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness; the expansion of Insulet's distribution network; Insulet's ability to successfully maintain effective internal controls; the volatility of Insulet's common stock; risks related to future sales of its common stock or the conversion of the 5.375% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2013 or 3.75% Convertible Notes due June 15, 2016; potential limitations on Insulet's ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards; anti-takeover provisions in its organizational documents; and other risks and uncertainties described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2012 in the section entitled "Risk Factors," and in its other filings from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of its assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Insulet undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.




                            INSULET CORPORATION
              CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                            Three Months Ended            Year Ended
                               December 31,              December 31,
                         ------------------------  ------------------------

                                                                    2011
                             2012         2011         2012       Restated
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
                                             (Unaudited)
                           (In thousands, except share and per share data)

Revenue                  $    57,829  $    47,192  $   211,369  $   152,255
Cost of revenue               32,510       27,112      119,033       85,543
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Gross profit                  25,319       20,080       92,336       66,712
Operating expenses:
  Research and
   development                 5,847        5,804       24,359       21,863
  General and
   administrative             12,824       12,498       51,240       44,083
  Sales and marketing         12,734       12,290       52,708       43,233
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
    Total operating
     expenses                 31,405       30,592      128,307      109,179
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Operating loss                (6,086)     (10,512)     (35,971)     (42,467)
Other expense, net            (4,039)      (3,785)     (15,684)     (14,576)
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Loss before income taxes     (10,125)     (14,297)     (51,655)     (57,043)
Income tax benefit
 (expense)                       (69)         (40)        (212)      11,212
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Net loss                 $   (10,194) $   (14,337) $   (51,867) $   (45,831)
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========
Net loss per share basic
 and diluted             $     (0.21) $     (0.30) $     (1.08) $     (0.98)
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========
Weighted average number
 of shares used in
 calculating basic and
 diluted net loss per
 share                    48,219,735   47,424,738   47,924,324   46,689,880
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========


Results for the year ended December 31, 2011 have been restated to correct
errors in the accounting for income taxes as reported on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on February 8, 2013.



                            INSULET CORPORATION
                   CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

                                                              As of
                                                          December 31,
                                                                    2011
                                                        2012      Restated
                                                     ----------  ----------
                                                           (Unaudited)
                                                      (In thousands, except
                                                           share data)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents                            $   57,293  $   93,955
Accounts receivable, net                                 33,294      23,190
Inventories                                              14,867      11,838
Prepaid expenses and other current assets                 4,482       3,652
                                                     ----------  ----------
    Total current assets                                109,936     132,635
Property and equipment, net                              25,422      19,422
Intangible assets, net                                   22,963      29,002
Goodwill                                                 37,536      37,536
Other assets                                              2,202       2,727
                                                     ----------  ----------
    Total assets                                     $  198,059  $  221,322
                                                     ==========  ==========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable                                     $    9,361  $   11,418
Accrued expenses                                         19,026      13,064
Deferred revenue                                          5,445       2,582
Current portion of long-term debt                        14,429           -
Other current liabilities                                    25         931
                                                     ----------  ----------
    Total current liabilities                            48,286      27,995
Long-term debt                                          103,730     108,540
Other long-term liabilities                               1,867       2,052
                                                     ----------  ----------
    Total liabilities                                   153,883     138,587
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value:
  Authorized: 5,000,000 shares at December 31, 2012
   and 2011. Issued and outstanding: zero shares at
   December 31, 2012 and 2011                                 -           -
Common stock, $.001 par value:
  Authorized: 100,000,000 shares at December 31,
   2012 and 2011. Issued and outstanding: 48,359,063
   and 47,504,131 shares at December 31, 2012 and
   2011, respectively                                        48          48
Additional paid-in capital                              525,679     512,371
Accumulated deficit                                    (481,551)   (429,684)
                                                     ----------  ----------
    Total stockholders' equity                           44,176      82,735
                                                     ----------  ----------
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity       $  198,059  $  221,322
                                                     ==========  ==========


Amounts as of December 31, 2011 have been restated to correct errors in the
accounting for income taxes as reported on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
February 8, 2013.




More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.