Welcome!

.NET Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Trevor Parsons, Peter Silva

News Feed Item

Ballard Reports 2012 Results and 2013 Outlook

VANCOUVER, Feb. 20, 2013 /PRNewswire/ - Ballard Power Systems (NASDAQ: BLDP) (TSX: BLD) today announced its consolidated financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2012. All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

"Q4 results reflected a marked turnaround from weak results earlier in the year - both top line and bottom line," said John Sheridan, President and CEO. "This Q4 top line momentum and a solid yearend order book support our business outlook for 2013 revenue growth in excess of 30%. This top line growth, along with continued reductions in the cost base and a projected increase in gross margin, underpin our expectation for improvement in Adjusted EBITDA in excess of 50%."

Background

On January 31, 2013 Ballard closed the sale of its Material Products division, a non-core asset located in Lowell, MA, in order to focus on high growth fuel cell products and to fortify the Company's cash position. Therefore, as per IFRS, Ballard's 2012 audited financial statements reflect "continuing operations" (excluding Material Products). In order to portray results comprehensively relative to the results reported throughout 2012 and to guidance for the full year, the financial results are also shown in the "2012 Financial Highlights" table below in a format which includes the Material Products division. Also, since the sale of the Material Products division was not completed until early 2013, the following section - with commentary on Q4 and full year 2012 results - addresses Ballard's performance including Material Products.

       
Q4 and Full Year 2012 Results (including Material Products)
 
Growth
Q4 revenue improved 50% to $21.3 million over the prior quarter, and improved 1% year-on-year.
    A key driver of the quarter-on-quarter revenue improvement was the addition of methanol-fueled ElectraGenTM systems to the backup power product line in August 2012. In Q4, 204 ElectraGenTM systems were shipped, 75% of which were methanol-fueled.
    In addition, engineering services contributed significantly to the growth, with revenue of $6.6 million in Q4 and more than $10 million for the year, a significant increase from less than $5 million in 2011.
Full year revenue declined $16.8 million or 22% to $59.2 million year-on-year, consistent with the Company's revised guidance for revenue of approximately $60 million.
    This year-on-year decline in 2012 revenue reflected weak performance in Material Products and Bus, in addition to the 2011 wind down of contract manufacturing. Excluding 2011 contract manufacturing, revenue improved 2%.
In terms of product volume metrics, the 204 ElectraGenTM systems shipped for backup power in Q4 represented a 172% improvement over Q4 2011. In addition, Q4 stack shipments for material handling of 468 represented a 41% decline from Q4 2011.
    Full year ElectraGenTM system shipments for backup power of 399 represented a 175% improvement relative to 2011. Full year stack shipments for material handling of 2,022 represented a 42% improvement relative to 2011.
       
Path to Profitability
Q4 gross margin improved 10 points to 24% over Q3, and improved 4 points relative to Q4
2011.
    Full year gross margin improved 2 points to 20%.
Q4 cash operating costs increased 10% to $7.8 million over Q3, but improved 10% relative
to Q4 2011.
    Full year cash operating costs improved 18% relative to 2011, to $32.2 million.
Q4 Adjusted EBITDA improved 65% to ($1.9) million over Q3, and improved 50% relative
to Q4 2011.
    Full year Adjusted EBITDA improved 17% to ($18.5) million, consistent with the
Company's revised guidance for Adjusted EBITDA of approximately ($18) million.  
Q4 cash used by operating activities improved 58% to ($0.5) million over Q3.
    Full year cash used by operating activities improved 15% to ($28.1) million relative
to 2011.
Cash reserves at yearend were $12.5 million net of $9.3 million outstanding on the
Company's bank operating line.
    This cash position was fortified with the sale of the Material Products division on
January 31, 2013, which generated proceeds of up to $12 million.
Q4 normalized net loss from continuing operations was unchanged at ($6.2) million
compared to Q4 2011.
    Full year normalized net loss from continuing operations improved 11% to ($31.5)
million relative to 2011.
       

2013 Business Outlook

The Company expects revenue growth in excess of 30%, led by backup power and engineering services, which together represent more than half of the $36.8 million 2012 yearend order book (excluding Material Products). It is expected that this growth, along with higher gross margins and a lower cost base, will contribute to improvements in bottom line performance.

2013 Guidance

The Company's guidance is for the following improvements in 2013 continuing operations:

  • Revenue growth in excess of 30%; and
  • Adjusted EBITDA improvement in excess of 50%.

2012 Financial Highlights

                 
Results of Operations Three months ended December 31, Twelve months ended December 31,
  2012 2011 % Improvement 2012 2011 % Improvement
(expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts and gross margin %)
Total (including Material Products)           
Revenue:             
  Fuel Cell Products  $16.5 $16.9 (2%) $43.7 $46.5 (6%)
  Contract Automotive - $0.1 (100%) - $9.3 (100%)
  Material Products $4.8 $4.0 19% $15.5 $20.2 (23%)
Total Revenue $21.3 $21.0 1% $59.2 $76.0 (22%)
Gross margin  $5.2 $4.1 27% $11.8 $13.9 (15%)
Gross margin % 24% 20% 4-points 20% 18% 2-points
Cash Operating Costs (1) $7.8 $8.6 10% $32.2 $39.3 18%
Adjusted EBITDA (1) ($1.9) ($3.8) 50% ($18.5) ($22.3) 17%
Cash Used by Operating Activities:             
  Cash Operating Income (Loss) ($2.4) ($4.7) 49% ($22.2) ($26.5) 16%
  Working Capital Changes $1.9 $8.8 (79%) ($5.9) ($6.7) 12%
  Cash Used by Operating Activities ($0.5) $4.1 (113%) ($28.1) ($33.2) 15%
Cash Reserves $21.8 $46.2        
Cash Reserves, Net of Operating Line $12.5 $41.6        
             
From continuing operations             
Revenue:             
  Fuel Cell Products $16.5 $16.9 (2%) $43.7 $46.5 (6%)
  Contract Automotive - 0.1 (100%) - $9.3 (100%)
Total Revenue $16.5 $17.0 (3%) $43.7 $55.8 (22%)
12 Month Rolling Order Book $36.8 $32.0        
Gross margin  $3.7 $2.9 25% $7.4 $7.3 1%
Gross margin %  22% 17% 5-points 17% 13% 4-points
Cash Operating Costs (1) $7.3 $8.2 11% $30.3 $37.0 18%
Adjusted EBITDA (1) ($3.2) ($4.9) 34% ($22.1) ($27.9) 21%
Net loss attributable to Ballard from continuing operations  ($16.8) ($8.0) (111%) ($42.1) ($37.2) (13%)
Net loss attributable to Ballard per share, basic and diluted  ($0.18) ($0.09) (100%) ($0.48) ($0.44) (9%)
Normalized Net Loss (1) ($6.2) ($6.2) - ($31.5) ($35.4) 11%
Normalized Net Loss (1) per share, basic and diluted ($0.07) ($0.07) - ($0.36) ($0.42) 14%
                   
   

 

For a more detailed discussion of Ballard Power Systems' 2012 results, please see the company's financial statements and management's discussion & analysis, which are available at www.ballard.com/investors, www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

Conference Call

Ballard will hold a conference call on Thursday, February 21, 2013 at 8:00 a.m. PST (11:00 a.m. EST) to review its 2012 operating results and 2013 outlook. The live call can be accessed by dialing +1.604.638.5340. Alternatively, a live audio webcast can be accessed through a link on Ballard's homepage (www.ballard.com). Following the call, the audio webcast will be archived in the Quarterly Results area of the Investor section of Ballard's website (www.ballard.com/investors).

About Ballard Power Systems

Ballard Power Systems (NASDAQ: BLDP) (TSX: BLD) provides clean energy fuel cell products enabling optimized power systems for a range of applications. Products deliver incomparable performance, durability and versatility. To learn more about Ballard, please visit www.ballard.com.

Important Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This release contains forward-looking statements concerning projected revenue growth, product shipments, gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, cash operating expenses and product sales. These forward-looking statements reflect Ballard's current expectations as contemplated under section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Any such statements are based on Ballard's assumptions relating to its financial forecasts and expectations regarding its product development efforts, manufacturing capacity, and market demand. For a detailed discussion of the factors and assumptions that these statements are based upon, and factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially, please refer to Ballard's most recent management discussion & analysis. Other risks and uncertainties that may cause Ballard's actual results to be materially different include general economic and regulatory changes, detrimental reliance on third parties, successfully achieving our business plans and achieving and sustaining profitability. For a detailed discussion of these and other risk factors that could affect Ballard's future performance, please refer to Ballard's most recent Annual Information Form. These forward-looking statements are provided to enable external stakeholders to understand Ballard's expectations as at the date of this release and may not be appropriate for other purposes. Readers should not place undue reliance on these statements and Ballard assumes no obligation to update or release any revisions to them, other than as required under applicable legislation.

Endnote:

1 Cash Operating Costs measures operating expenses excluding stock based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, acquisition costs and financing charges. EBITDA measures net loss attributable to Ballard Power Systems Inc. excluding finance expense, income taxes, depreciation of property, plant and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and goodwill impairment charges. Adjusted EBITDA adjusts EBITDA for stock based compensation expense, transactional gains and losses, asset impairment charges, finance and other income and acquisition costs. Normalized Net Loss measures net loss attributable to Ballard from continuing operations, excluding transactional gains and losses and asset impairment charges.

Note that Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Normalized Net Loss, are non GAAP measures. Non GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Ballard believes that Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Normalized Net Loss assist investors in assessing Ballard's operating performance and liquidity. These measures should be used in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows and other measures of financial performance and liquidity reported in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Normalized Net Loss to the Consolidated Financial Statements, please refer to Ballard's Management's Discussion & Analysis. 

 

 

Guy McAree +1.604.412.7919, [email protected] or [email protected]

SOURCE Ballard Power Systems Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.