Welcome!

Microsoft Cloud Authors: Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, John Basso, Elizabeth White, Mihai Corbuleac

News Feed Item

Enbridge Energy Partners Reports 2012 Earnings and Announces 2013 Financial Guidance

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwire) -- 02/13/13 -- Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.'s (NYSE: EEP) ("Enbridge Partners" or "the Partnership") key financial results for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, were as follows:


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
                                      December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income                       $     54.3 $    227.4 $    493.1 $    624.0
Net income per unit                    0.07       0.64       1.27       1.99
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Adjusted EBITDA (1)                   267.5      295.4    1,144.1    1,182.9
Adjusted net income                    87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Adjusted net income per unit           0.18       0.32       0.99       1.39
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(1) Includes non-controlling interest.

Adjusted net income for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012, reported above, eliminates the impact of: (a) additional environmental costs, net of insurance recoveries, associated with the incidents on Lines 14 and 6B; and (b) non-cash, mark-to-market net gains and losses; among other adjustments. Refer to the Non-GAAP Reconciliations table below for additional details.

Adjusted net income of $87.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $29.2 million lower than the same period from the prior year primarily due to lower natural gas liquids ("NGL") prices and increased operating and administrative expenses.

"Adjusted earnings for 2012 are not reflective of our expectations primarily as a result of weak natural gas and NGL prices that impacted our performance. While we believe natural gas and NGL fundamentals will gradually improve, we remain focused on our objective of delivering sustainable and prudent growth to our unitholders," said Mark Maki, President of the Partnership. "Above all else, Enbridge and the Partnership are committed to achieving industry leadership in the areas of safety and integrity and we continue to make the operating and capital investments necessary to achieve this objective," added Maki.

"The long-term outlook for the Partnership remains strong. Our $8.5 billion secured growth program is proceeding on schedule and will progressively transform the Partnership towards an even lower risk business model as the cash flows are secured predominantly by long-term, low-risk commercial frameworks such as cost-of-service or demand-based contract structures. The Partnership's distributable cash flow growth will begin to accelerate once these accretive growth projects enter service, which will solidify our long-term distribution growth outlook of 2 to 5 percent annually. We expect business fundamentals will continue to improve later in 2013. As a result, we estimate the Partnership's EBITDA for 2013 will increase in excess of 10% and will be between $1,250 million and $1,350 million," noted Maki.


COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
                                     December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating revenue                $ 1,771.2  $ 2,076.7  $ 6,706.1  $ 9,109.8
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas              1,249.4    1,603.9    4,570.1    7,100.1
  Environmental costs, net of
   recoveries                         17.7     (158.1)     (91.3)    (113.3)
  Oil measurement adjustments         (2.4)      (1.9)     (11.5)     (63.4)
  Operating and administrative       224.5      189.0      852.0      705.0
  Power                               32.2       37.6      148.8      144.8
  Depreciation and amortization       88.3       82.9      344.8      339.8
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                     161.5      323.3      893.2      996.8
Interest expense                      96.2       84.0      345.0      320.6
Other income                           5.6        0.5       10.0        6.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Income before income tax expense      70.9      239.8      558.2      682.7
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                            69.2      239.6      550.1      677.2
Less: Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest              14.9       12.2       57.0       53.2
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net income attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interests in Enbridge
 Energy Partners, L.P.           $    54.3  $   227.4  $   493.1  $   624.0
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.2       52.4      123.9      103.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income allocable to Limited
 Partners                        $    23.1  $   175.0  $   369.2  $   520.5
Weighted average Limited Partner
 units (millions)                    302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income per Limited Partner
 unit (dollars)                  $    0.07  $    0.64  $    1.27  $    1.99
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Following are explanations for significant changes in the Partnership's financial results, comparing the three month period ended December 31, 2012 with the same period of 2011. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
    Adjusted Operating Income        December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Liquids                          $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
Natural Gas                           42.9       51.4      198.9      216.7
Marketing                             (1.4)      (1.2)      (8.3)      (1.5)
Corporate                             (0.9)       0.3       (2.3)      (2.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   173.6  $   212.0  $   789.3  $   840.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Liquids - For the three month period ended December 31, 2012, adjusted operating income for the Liquids segment decreased $28.5 million from $161.5 million for December 31, 2011 to $133.0 million. Higher revenues from an increase in index transportation rates, in addition to higher storage revenues from the Partnership's Cushing storage facilities, were more than offset by lower volumes on our liquids pipeline systems and higher operating and administrative expenses. The increase in operating and administrative expenses was attributable to higher pipeline integrity costs, higher depreciation expense related to assets placed into service and an increase in workforce related costs. Additionally, fourth quarter 2012 results reflected approximately $9 million of costs to complete remediation of crude oil releases, primarily around our terminals.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Liquids Systems Volumes          December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(thousand barrels per day)          2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Lakehead                              1,737      1,742      1,790      1,700
Mid-Continent                           207        228        223        226
North Dakota                            173        219        206        197
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                                 2,117      2,189      2,219      2,123
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Natural Gas - Adjusted operating income for the Natural Gas segment was $42.9 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, which was $8.5 million lower than the same period in 2011. Fourth quarter 2012 adjusted operating income was impacted by lower revenues due to lower natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, lower volumes on our East Texas system and higher operating and administrative expenses.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Natural Gas Throughput           December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(MMBtu per day)                     2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
East Texas                        1,233,000  1,335,000  1,266,000  1,378,000
Anadarko                            998,000  1,030,000  1,017,000  1,013,000
North Texas                         333,000    327,000    330,000    337,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                             2,564,000  2,692,000  2,613,000  2,728,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Marketing - The Marketing segment reported an adjusted operating loss of $1.4 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.2 million from the $1.2 million of adjusted operating loss for the same period of 2011. The gas marketing business continues to be impacted by a weak natural gas pricing environment and narrow locational basis differentials.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2013 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
Enbridge Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and present its 2013 financial guidance in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2013. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

EEP Events and Presentations:
www.enbridgepartners.com/Investor-Relations/EEP/Events-and-Presentations/

Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/7sorrxmc

The audio portion of the presentation will be accessible by telephone at (877) 299-4454 (Passcode: 37159171) and can be replayed until May 14, 2013 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 59784432). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
        Adjusted Earnings            December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                       $    69.2  $   239.6  $   550.1  $   677.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses
  -Liquids                             1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
  -Natural Gas                         6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
  -Marketing                             -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
  -Corporate                          20.8        0.3       21.0        0.8
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest             (14.9)     (12.2)     (57.0)     (53.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income                   87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.9       27.6      122.2      100.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income allocable to
 Limited Partners                     55.3       88.8      288.0      364.3
Weighted average units
 (millions)                          302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income per Limited
 Partner unit (dollars)          $    0.18  $    0.32  $    0.99  $    1.39
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------



                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
             Liquids                 December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $   123.2  $   297.4  $   706.8  $   816.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (5.6)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
           Natural Gas               December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $    40.6  $    26.0  $   200.1  $   183.6
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $    42.9  $    51.4  $   198.9  $   216.7
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
            Marketing                December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating loss                   $    (1.4) $    (0.4) $   (11.4) $    (0.8)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                          -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income loss   $    (1.4) $    (1.2) $    (8.3) $    (1.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
         Adjusted EBITDA             December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net cash provided by operating
 activities                      $   142.7  $   393.0  $   851.0  $ 1,045.6
Changes in operating assets and
 liabilities, net of cash
 acquired                             65.5       36.0      180.9      111.0
Interest expense (1)                  75.4       83.7      324.0      319.8
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
Line 6B insurance recoveries
 received (2)                        (20.0)    (235.0)    (220.0)    (285.0)
Settlement of interest rate
 swaps/treasury locks                    -          -          -       18.8
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual weather
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Other                                  6.6       (7.7)      (3.0)     (20.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted EBITDA                  $   267.5  $   295.4  $ 1,144.1  $ 1,182.9
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

(1) Interest expense excludes unrealized mark-to-market net losses of $20.8
    million and $21.0 for the three and twelve month periods ended December
    31, 2012, respectively. Excluded from interest expense for the three and
    twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 are unrealized mark-to-
    market net losses of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

(2) Excludes $50.0 million of insurance recoveries for the year ended
    December 31, 2011, which were accrued at December 31, 2011. These
    insurance recoveries were received in the first quarter of 2012 and are
    included in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012.

About Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (www.enbridgepartners.com) owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest transporter of growing oil production from western Canada. The system's deliveries to refining centers and connected carriers in the United States account for approximately 15 percent of total U.S. oil imports, while deliveries to Ontario, Canada satisfy approximately 70 percent of refinery demand in that region. The Partnership's natural gas gathering, treating, processing and transmission assets, which are principally located onshore in the active U.S. Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas, deliver approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (www.enbridgemanagement.com) manages the business and affairs of the Partnership, and its sole asset is an approximate 13 percent interest in the Partnership. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, (NYSE: ENB) (TSX: ENB) (www.enbridge.com), is the general partner of the Partnership and holds an approximate 22 percent interest in the Partnership.

LEGAL NOTICE

This news release includes forward-looking statements and projections, which are statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements frequently use the following words, variations thereon or comparable terminology: "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Enbridge Partners' ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and NGLs, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) Enbridge Partners' ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline systems; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at facilities of Enbridge Partners or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which Enbridge Partners transports products or to whom Enbridge Partners sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to Enbridge Partners' tariff rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which Enbridge Partners is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Reference should also be made to Enbridge Partners' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and its subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, for additional factors that may affect results. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site (www.sec.gov) and at the Partnership's web site.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
In addition to all the benefits, IoT is also bringing new kind of customer experience challenges - cars that unlock themselves, thermostats turning houses into saunas and baby video monitors broadcasting over the internet. This list can only increase because while IoT services should be intuitive and simple to use, the delivery ecosystem is a myriad of potential problems as IoT explodes complexity. So finding a performance issue is like finding the proverbial needle in the haystack.
Machine Learning helps make complex systems more efficient. By applying advanced Machine Learning techniques such as Cognitive Fingerprinting, wind project operators can utilize these tools to learn from collected data, detect regular patterns, and optimize their own operations. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Stuart Gillen, Director of Business Development at SparkCognition, discussed how research has demonstrated the value of Machine Learning in delivering next generation analytics to imp...
Large scale deployments present unique planning challenges, system commissioning hurdles between IT and OT and demand careful system hand-off orchestration. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Smith, Senior Director and a founding member of Incenergy, will discuss some of the key tactics to ensure delivery success based on his experience of the last two years deploying Industrial IoT systems across four continents.
The 19th International Cloud Expo has announced that its Call for Papers is open. Cloud Expo, to be held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, brings together Cloud Computing, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, Digital Transformation, Microservices and WebRTC to one location. With cloud computing driving a higher percentage of enterprise IT budgets every year, it becomes increasingly important to plant your flag in this fast-expanding business opportuni...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develo...
Basho Technologies has announced the latest release of Basho Riak TS, version 1.3. Riak TS is an enterprise-grade NoSQL database optimized for Internet of Things (IoT). The open source version enables developers to download the software for free and use it in production as well as make contributions to the code and develop applications around Riak TS. Enhancements to Riak TS make it quick, easy and cost-effective to spin up an instance to test new ideas and build IoT applications. In addition to...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 19th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world and ThingsExpo Silicon Valley Call for Papers is now open.
IoT is rapidly changing the way enterprises are using data to improve business decision-making. In order to derive business value, organizations must unlock insights from the data gathered and then act on these. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, and Peter Shashkin, Head of Development Department at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how one organization leveraged IoT, cloud technology and data analysis to improve customer experiences and effi...
"We've discovered that after shows 80% if leads that people get, 80% of the conversations end up on the show floor, meaning people forget about it, people forget who they talk to, people forget that there are actual business opportunities to be had here so we try to help out and keep the conversations going," explained Jeff Mesnik, Founder and President of ContentMX, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
With 15% of enterprises adopting a hybrid IT strategy, you need to set a plan to integrate hybrid cloud throughout your infrastructure. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Steven Dreher, Director of Solutions Architecture at Green House Data, discussed how to plan for shifting resource requirements, overcome challenges, and implement hybrid IT alongside your existing data center assets. Highlights included anticipating workload, cost and resource calculations, integrating services on both sides...
Manufacturers are embracing the Industrial Internet the same way consumers are leveraging Fitbits – to improve overall health and wellness. Both can provide consistent measurement, visibility, and suggest performance improvements customized to help reach goals. Fitbit users can view real-time data and make adjustments to increase their activity. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mark Bernardo Professional Services Leader, Americas, at GE Digital, discussed how leveraging the Industrial Internet a...
Big Data engines are powering a lot of service businesses right now. Data is collected from users from wearable technologies, web behaviors, purchase behavior as well as several arbitrary data points we’d never think of. The demand for faster and bigger engines to crunch and serve up the data to services is growing exponentially. You see a LOT of correlation between “Cloud” and “Big Data” but on Big Data and “Hybrid,” where hybrid hosting is the sanest approach to the Big Data Infrastructure pro...
"My role is working with customers, helping them go through this digital transformation. I spend a lot of time talking to banks, big industries, manufacturers working through how they are integrating and transforming their IT platforms and moving them forward," explained William Morrish, General Manager Product Sales at Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
A critical component of any IoT project is what to do with all the data being generated. This data needs to be captured, processed, structured, and stored in a way to facilitate different kinds of queries. Traditional data warehouse and analytical systems are mature technologies that can be used to handle certain kinds of queries, but they are not always well suited to many problems, particularly when there is a need for real-time insights.
The best-practices for building IoT applications with Go Code that attendees can use to build their own IoT applications. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Indraneel Mitra, Senior Solutions Architect & Technology Evangelist at Cognizant, provided valuable information and resources for both novice and experienced developers on how to get started with IoT and Golang in a day. He also provided information on how to use Intel Arduino Kit, Go Robotics API and AWS IoT stack to build an application tha...
IoT generates lots of temporal data. But how do you unlock its value? You need to discover patterns that are repeatable in vast quantities of data, understand their meaning, and implement scalable monitoring across multiple data streams in order to monetize the discoveries and insights. Motif discovery and deep learning platforms are emerging to visualize sensor data, to search for patterns and to build application that can monitor real time streams efficiently. In his session at @ThingsExpo, ...
You think you know what’s in your data. But do you? Most organizations are now aware of the business intelligence represented by their data. Data science stands to take this to a level you never thought of – literally. The techniques of data science, when used with the capabilities of Big Data technologies, can make connections you had not yet imagined, helping you discover new insights and ask new questions of your data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sarbjit Sarkaria, data science team lead ...
Extracting business value from Internet of Things (IoT) data doesn’t happen overnight. There are several requirements that must be satisfied, including IoT device enablement, data analysis, real-time detection of complex events and automated orchestration of actions. Unfortunately, too many companies fall short in achieving their business goals by implementing incomplete solutions or not focusing on tangible use cases. In his general session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products...
WebRTC is bringing significant change to the communications landscape that will bridge the worlds of web and telephony, making the Internet the new standard for communications. Cloud9 took the road less traveled and used WebRTC to create a downloadable enterprise-grade communications platform that is changing the communication dynamic in the financial sector. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Leo Papadopoulos, CTO of Cloud9, discussed the importance of WebRTC and how it enables companies to focus...
Amazon has gradually rolled out parts of its IoT offerings in the last year, but these are just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to optimizing their back-end AWS offerings, Amazon is laying the ground work to be a major force in IoT – especially in the connected home and office. Amazon is extending its reach by building on its dominant Cloud IoT platform, its Dash Button strategy, recently announced Replenishment Services, the Echo/Alexa voice recognition control platform, the 6-7 strategic...