Welcome!

Microsoft Cloud Authors: Janakiram MSV, Yeshim Deniz, David H Deans, Andreas Grabner, Stackify Blog

News Feed Item

Enbridge Energy Partners Reports 2012 Earnings and Announces 2013 Financial Guidance

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwire) -- 02/13/13 -- Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.'s (NYSE: EEP) ("Enbridge Partners" or "the Partnership") key financial results for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, were as follows:

                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
                                      December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income                       $     54.3 $    227.4 $    493.1 $    624.0
Net income per unit                    0.07       0.64       1.27       1.99
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Adjusted EBITDA (1)                   267.5      295.4    1,144.1    1,182.9
Adjusted net income                    87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Adjusted net income per unit           0.18       0.32       0.99       1.39
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(1) Includes non-controlling interest.

Adjusted net income for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012, reported above, eliminates the impact of: (a) additional environmental costs, net of insurance recoveries, associated with the incidents on Lines 14 and 6B; and (b) non-cash, mark-to-market net gains and losses; among other adjustments. Refer to the Non-GAAP Reconciliations table below for additional details.

Adjusted net income of $87.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $29.2 million lower than the same period from the prior year primarily due to lower natural gas liquids ("NGL") prices and increased operating and administrative expenses.

"Adjusted earnings for 2012 are not reflective of our expectations primarily as a result of weak natural gas and NGL prices that impacted our performance. While we believe natural gas and NGL fundamentals will gradually improve, we remain focused on our objective of delivering sustainable and prudent growth to our unitholders," said Mark Maki, President of the Partnership. "Above all else, Enbridge and the Partnership are committed to achieving industry leadership in the areas of safety and integrity and we continue to make the operating and capital investments necessary to achieve this objective," added Maki.

"The long-term outlook for the Partnership remains strong. Our $8.5 billion secured growth program is proceeding on schedule and will progressively transform the Partnership towards an even lower risk business model as the cash flows are secured predominantly by long-term, low-risk commercial frameworks such as cost-of-service or demand-based contract structures. The Partnership's distributable cash flow growth will begin to accelerate once these accretive growth projects enter service, which will solidify our long-term distribution growth outlook of 2 to 5 percent annually. We expect business fundamentals will continue to improve later in 2013. As a result, we estimate the Partnership's EBITDA for 2013 will increase in excess of 10% and will be between $1,250 million and $1,350 million," noted Maki.

COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
                                     December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating revenue                $ 1,771.2  $ 2,076.7  $ 6,706.1  $ 9,109.8
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas              1,249.4    1,603.9    4,570.1    7,100.1
  Environmental costs, net of
   recoveries                         17.7     (158.1)     (91.3)    (113.3)
  Oil measurement adjustments         (2.4)      (1.9)     (11.5)     (63.4)
  Operating and administrative       224.5      189.0      852.0      705.0
  Power                               32.2       37.6      148.8      144.8
  Depreciation and amortization       88.3       82.9      344.8      339.8
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                     161.5      323.3      893.2      996.8
Interest expense                      96.2       84.0      345.0      320.6
Other income                           5.6        0.5       10.0        6.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Income before income tax expense      70.9      239.8      558.2      682.7
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                            69.2      239.6      550.1      677.2
Less: Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest              14.9       12.2       57.0       53.2
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net income attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interests in Enbridge
 Energy Partners, L.P.           $    54.3  $   227.4  $   493.1  $   624.0
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.2       52.4      123.9      103.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income allocable to Limited
 Partners                        $    23.1  $   175.0  $   369.2  $   520.5
Weighted average Limited Partner
 units (millions)                    302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income per Limited Partner
 unit (dollars)                  $    0.07  $    0.64  $    1.27  $    1.99
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Following are explanations for significant changes in the Partnership's financial results, comparing the three month period ended December 31, 2012 with the same period of 2011. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
    Adjusted Operating Income        December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Liquids                          $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
Natural Gas                           42.9       51.4      198.9      216.7
Marketing                             (1.4)      (1.2)      (8.3)      (1.5)
Corporate                             (0.9)       0.3       (2.3)      (2.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   173.6  $   212.0  $   789.3  $   840.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Liquids - For the three month period ended December 31, 2012, adjusted operating income for the Liquids segment decreased $28.5 million from $161.5 million for December 31, 2011 to $133.0 million. Higher revenues from an increase in index transportation rates, in addition to higher storage revenues from the Partnership's Cushing storage facilities, were more than offset by lower volumes on our liquids pipeline systems and higher operating and administrative expenses. The increase in operating and administrative expenses was attributable to higher pipeline integrity costs, higher depreciation expense related to assets placed into service and an increase in workforce related costs. Additionally, fourth quarter 2012 results reflected approximately $9 million of costs to complete remediation of crude oil releases, primarily around our terminals.

                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Liquids Systems Volumes          December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(thousand barrels per day)          2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Lakehead                              1,737      1,742      1,790      1,700
Mid-Continent                           207        228        223        226
North Dakota                            173        219        206        197
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                                 2,117      2,189      2,219      2,123
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Natural Gas - Adjusted operating income for the Natural Gas segment was $42.9 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, which was $8.5 million lower than the same period in 2011. Fourth quarter 2012 adjusted operating income was impacted by lower revenues due to lower natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, lower volumes on our East Texas system and higher operating and administrative expenses.

                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Natural Gas Throughput           December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(MMBtu per day)                     2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
East Texas                        1,233,000  1,335,000  1,266,000  1,378,000
Anadarko                            998,000  1,030,000  1,017,000  1,013,000
North Texas                         333,000    327,000    330,000    337,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                             2,564,000  2,692,000  2,613,000  2,728,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Marketing - The Marketing segment reported an adjusted operating loss of $1.4 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.2 million from the $1.2 million of adjusted operating loss for the same period of 2011. The gas marketing business continues to be impacted by a weak natural gas pricing environment and narrow locational basis differentials.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2013 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
Enbridge Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and present its 2013 financial guidance in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2013. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

EEP Events and Presentations:
www.enbridgepartners.com/Investor-Relations/EEP/Events-and-Presentations/

Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/7sorrxmc

The audio portion of the presentation will be accessible by telephone at (877) 299-4454 (Passcode: 37159171) and can be replayed until May 14, 2013 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 59784432). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
        Adjusted Earnings            December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                       $    69.2  $   239.6  $   550.1  $   677.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses
  -Liquids                             1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
  -Natural Gas                         6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
  -Marketing                             -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
  -Corporate                          20.8        0.3       21.0        0.8
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest             (14.9)     (12.2)     (57.0)     (53.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income                   87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.9       27.6      122.2      100.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income allocable to
 Limited Partners                     55.3       88.8      288.0      364.3
Weighted average units
 (millions)                          302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income per Limited
 Partner unit (dollars)          $    0.18  $    0.32  $    0.99  $    1.39
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------



                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
             Liquids                 December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $   123.2  $   297.4  $   706.8  $   816.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (5.6)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
           Natural Gas               December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $    40.6  $    26.0  $   200.1  $   183.6
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $    42.9  $    51.4  $   198.9  $   216.7
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
            Marketing                December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating loss                   $    (1.4) $    (0.4) $   (11.4) $    (0.8)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                          -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income loss   $    (1.4) $    (1.2) $    (8.3) $    (1.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
         Adjusted EBITDA             December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net cash provided by operating
 activities                      $   142.7  $   393.0  $   851.0  $ 1,045.6
Changes in operating assets and
 liabilities, net of cash
 acquired                             65.5       36.0      180.9      111.0
Interest expense (1)                  75.4       83.7      324.0      319.8
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
Line 6B insurance recoveries
 received (2)                        (20.0)    (235.0)    (220.0)    (285.0)
Settlement of interest rate
 swaps/treasury locks                    -          -          -       18.8
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual weather
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Other                                  6.6       (7.7)      (3.0)     (20.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted EBITDA                  $   267.5  $   295.4  $ 1,144.1  $ 1,182.9
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

(1) Interest expense excludes unrealized mark-to-market net losses of $20.8
    million and $21.0 for the three and twelve month periods ended December
    31, 2012, respectively. Excluded from interest expense for the three and
    twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 are unrealized mark-to-
    market net losses of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

(2) Excludes $50.0 million of insurance recoveries for the year ended
    December 31, 2011, which were accrued at December 31, 2011. These
    insurance recoveries were received in the first quarter of 2012 and are
    included in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012.

About Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (www.enbridgepartners.com) owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest transporter of growing oil production from western Canada. The system's deliveries to refining centers and connected carriers in the United States account for approximately 15 percent of total U.S. oil imports, while deliveries to Ontario, Canada satisfy approximately 70 percent of refinery demand in that region. The Partnership's natural gas gathering, treating, processing and transmission assets, which are principally located onshore in the active U.S. Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas, deliver approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (www.enbridgemanagement.com) manages the business and affairs of the Partnership, and its sole asset is an approximate 13 percent interest in the Partnership. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, (NYSE: ENB) (TSX: ENB) (www.enbridge.com), is the general partner of the Partnership and holds an approximate 22 percent interest in the Partnership.

LEGAL NOTICE

This news release includes forward-looking statements and projections, which are statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements frequently use the following words, variations thereon or comparable terminology: "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Enbridge Partners' ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and NGLs, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) Enbridge Partners' ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline systems; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at facilities of Enbridge Partners or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which Enbridge Partners transports products or to whom Enbridge Partners sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to Enbridge Partners' tariff rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which Enbridge Partners is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Reference should also be made to Enbridge Partners' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and its subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, for additional factors that may affect results. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site (www.sec.gov) and at the Partnership's web site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT

Investor Relations Contact:
Sanjay Lad
Toll-free: (866) EEP INFO or (866) 337-4636
E-mail: [email protected]

Media Contact:
Terri Larson
Telephone: (877) 496-8142
E-mail: [email protected]

Website: enbridgepartners.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Gemini is Yahoo’s native and search advertising platform. To ensure the quality of a complex distributed system that spans multiple products and components and across various desktop websites and mobile app and web experiences – both Yahoo owned and operated and third-party syndication (supply), with complex interaction with more than a billion users and numerous advertisers globally (demand) – it becomes imperative to automate a set of end-to-end tests 24x7 to detect bugs and regression. In th...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"MobiDev is a software development company and we do complex, custom software development for everybody from entrepreneurs to large enterprises," explained Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Carl J. Levine, Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1, will objectively discuss how DNS is used to solve Digital Transformation challenges in large SaaS applications, CDNs, AdTech platforms, and other demanding use cases. Carl J. Levine is the Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1. A veteran of the Internet Infrastructure space, he has over a decade of experience with startups, networking protocols and Internet infrastructure, combined with the unique ability to it...
"IBM is really all in on blockchain. We take a look at sort of the history of blockchain ledger technologies. It started out with bitcoin, Ethereum, and IBM evaluated these particular blockchain technologies and found they were anonymous and permissionless and that many companies were looking for permissioned blockchain," stated René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventi...
"Cloud Academy is an enterprise training platform for the cloud, specifically public clouds. We offer guided learning experiences on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and all the surrounding methodologies and technologies that you need to know and your teams need to know in order to leverage the full benefits of the cloud," explained Alex Brower, VP of Marketing at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clar...
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection between Coke and its customers. Digital signs pair software with high-resolution displays so that a message can be changed instantly based on what the operator wants to communicate or sell. In their Day 3 Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Chambers, Global Group Director, Digital Innovation, Coca-Cola, and Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, discussed how from store operations and ...
"There's plenty of bandwidth out there but it's never in the right place. So what Cedexis does is uses data to work out the best pathways to get data from the origin to the person who wants to get it," explained Simon Jones, Evangelist and Head of Marketing at Cedexis, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Telecom Reseller has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Telecom Reseller reports on Unified Communications, UCaaS, BPaaS for enterprise and SMBs. They report extensively on both customer premises based solutions such as IP-PBX as well as cloud based and hosted platforms.
It is of utmost importance for the future success of WebRTC to ensure that interoperability is operational between web browsers and any WebRTC-compliant client. To be guaranteed as operational and effective, interoperability must be tested extensively by establishing WebRTC data and media connections between different web browsers running on different devices and operating systems. In his session at WebRTC Summit at @ThingsExpo, Dr. Alex Gouaillard, CEO and Founder of CoSMo Software, presented ...
WebRTC is great technology to build your own communication tools. It will be even more exciting experience it with advanced devices, such as a 360 Camera, 360 microphone, and a depth sensor camera. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Masashi Ganeko, a manager at INFOCOM Corporation, introduced two experimental projects from his team and what they learned from them. "Shotoku Tamago" uses the robot audition software HARK to track speakers in 360 video of a remote party. "Virtual Teleport" uses a multip...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Evatronix will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Evatronix SA offers comprehensive solutions in the design and implementation of electronic systems, in CAD / CAM deployment, and also is a designer and manufacturer of advanced 3D scanners for professional applications.
Leading companies, from the Global Fortune 500 to the smallest companies, are adopting hybrid cloud as the path to business advantage. Hybrid cloud depends on cloud services and on-premises infrastructure working in unison. Successful implementations require new levels of data mobility, enabled by an automated and seamless flow across on-premises and cloud resources. In his general session at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Tevis, an IBM Storage Software Technical Strategist and Customer Solution Architec...
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
An increasing number of companies are creating products that combine data with analytical capabilities. Running interactive queries on Big Data requires complex architectures to store and query data effectively, typically involving data streams, an choosing efficient file format/database and multiple independent systems that are tied together through custom-engineered pipelines. In his session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Tomer Levi, a senior software engineer at Intel’s Advanced Analytics gr...