Welcome!

.NET Authors: ITinvolve Blog, Srinivasan Sundara Rajan, Sematext Blog, Aditya Banerjee, Jayaram Krishnaswamy

News Feed Item

Enbridge Energy Partners Reports 2012 Earnings and Announces 2013 Financial Guidance

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwire) -- 02/13/13 -- Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.'s (NYSE: EEP) ("Enbridge Partners" or "the Partnership") key financial results for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, were as follows:


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
                                      December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income                       $     54.3 $    227.4 $    493.1 $    624.0
Net income per unit                    0.07       0.64       1.27       1.99
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Adjusted EBITDA (1)                   267.5      295.4    1,144.1    1,182.9
Adjusted net income                    87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Adjusted net income per unit           0.18       0.32       0.99       1.39
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(1) Includes non-controlling interest.

Adjusted net income for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012, reported above, eliminates the impact of: (a) additional environmental costs, net of insurance recoveries, associated with the incidents on Lines 14 and 6B; and (b) non-cash, mark-to-market net gains and losses; among other adjustments. Refer to the Non-GAAP Reconciliations table below for additional details.

Adjusted net income of $87.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $29.2 million lower than the same period from the prior year primarily due to lower natural gas liquids ("NGL") prices and increased operating and administrative expenses.

"Adjusted earnings for 2012 are not reflective of our expectations primarily as a result of weak natural gas and NGL prices that impacted our performance. While we believe natural gas and NGL fundamentals will gradually improve, we remain focused on our objective of delivering sustainable and prudent growth to our unitholders," said Mark Maki, President of the Partnership. "Above all else, Enbridge and the Partnership are committed to achieving industry leadership in the areas of safety and integrity and we continue to make the operating and capital investments necessary to achieve this objective," added Maki.

"The long-term outlook for the Partnership remains strong. Our $8.5 billion secured growth program is proceeding on schedule and will progressively transform the Partnership towards an even lower risk business model as the cash flows are secured predominantly by long-term, low-risk commercial frameworks such as cost-of-service or demand-based contract structures. The Partnership's distributable cash flow growth will begin to accelerate once these accretive growth projects enter service, which will solidify our long-term distribution growth outlook of 2 to 5 percent annually. We expect business fundamentals will continue to improve later in 2013. As a result, we estimate the Partnership's EBITDA for 2013 will increase in excess of 10% and will be between $1,250 million and $1,350 million," noted Maki.


COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
                                     December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating revenue                $ 1,771.2  $ 2,076.7  $ 6,706.1  $ 9,109.8
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas              1,249.4    1,603.9    4,570.1    7,100.1
  Environmental costs, net of
   recoveries                         17.7     (158.1)     (91.3)    (113.3)
  Oil measurement adjustments         (2.4)      (1.9)     (11.5)     (63.4)
  Operating and administrative       224.5      189.0      852.0      705.0
  Power                               32.2       37.6      148.8      144.8
  Depreciation and amortization       88.3       82.9      344.8      339.8
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                     161.5      323.3      893.2      996.8
Interest expense                      96.2       84.0      345.0      320.6
Other income                           5.6        0.5       10.0        6.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Income before income tax expense      70.9      239.8      558.2      682.7
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                            69.2      239.6      550.1      677.2
Less: Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest              14.9       12.2       57.0       53.2
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net income attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interests in Enbridge
 Energy Partners, L.P.           $    54.3  $   227.4  $   493.1  $   624.0
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.2       52.4      123.9      103.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income allocable to Limited
 Partners                        $    23.1  $   175.0  $   369.2  $   520.5
Weighted average Limited Partner
 units (millions)                    302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income per Limited Partner
 unit (dollars)                  $    0.07  $    0.64  $    1.27  $    1.99
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Following are explanations for significant changes in the Partnership's financial results, comparing the three month period ended December 31, 2012 with the same period of 2011. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
    Adjusted Operating Income        December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Liquids                          $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
Natural Gas                           42.9       51.4      198.9      216.7
Marketing                             (1.4)      (1.2)      (8.3)      (1.5)
Corporate                             (0.9)       0.3       (2.3)      (2.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   173.6  $   212.0  $   789.3  $   840.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Liquids - For the three month period ended December 31, 2012, adjusted operating income for the Liquids segment decreased $28.5 million from $161.5 million for December 31, 2011 to $133.0 million. Higher revenues from an increase in index transportation rates, in addition to higher storage revenues from the Partnership's Cushing storage facilities, were more than offset by lower volumes on our liquids pipeline systems and higher operating and administrative expenses. The increase in operating and administrative expenses was attributable to higher pipeline integrity costs, higher depreciation expense related to assets placed into service and an increase in workforce related costs. Additionally, fourth quarter 2012 results reflected approximately $9 million of costs to complete remediation of crude oil releases, primarily around our terminals.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Liquids Systems Volumes          December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(thousand barrels per day)          2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Lakehead                              1,737      1,742      1,790      1,700
Mid-Continent                           207        228        223        226
North Dakota                            173        219        206        197
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                                 2,117      2,189      2,219      2,123
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Natural Gas - Adjusted operating income for the Natural Gas segment was $42.9 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, which was $8.5 million lower than the same period in 2011. Fourth quarter 2012 adjusted operating income was impacted by lower revenues due to lower natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, lower volumes on our East Texas system and higher operating and administrative expenses.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Natural Gas Throughput           December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(MMBtu per day)                     2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
East Texas                        1,233,000  1,335,000  1,266,000  1,378,000
Anadarko                            998,000  1,030,000  1,017,000  1,013,000
North Texas                         333,000    327,000    330,000    337,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                             2,564,000  2,692,000  2,613,000  2,728,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Marketing - The Marketing segment reported an adjusted operating loss of $1.4 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.2 million from the $1.2 million of adjusted operating loss for the same period of 2011. The gas marketing business continues to be impacted by a weak natural gas pricing environment and narrow locational basis differentials.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2013 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
Enbridge Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and present its 2013 financial guidance in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2013. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

EEP Events and Presentations:
www.enbridgepartners.com/Investor-Relations/EEP/Events-and-Presentations/

Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/7sorrxmc

The audio portion of the presentation will be accessible by telephone at (877) 299-4454 (Passcode: 37159171) and can be replayed until May 14, 2013 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 59784432). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
        Adjusted Earnings            December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                       $    69.2  $   239.6  $   550.1  $   677.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses
  -Liquids                             1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
  -Natural Gas                         6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
  -Marketing                             -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
  -Corporate                          20.8        0.3       21.0        0.8
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest             (14.9)     (12.2)     (57.0)     (53.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income                   87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.9       27.6      122.2      100.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income allocable to
 Limited Partners                     55.3       88.8      288.0      364.3
Weighted average units
 (millions)                          302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income per Limited
 Partner unit (dollars)          $    0.18  $    0.32  $    0.99  $    1.39
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------



                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
             Liquids                 December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $   123.2  $   297.4  $   706.8  $   816.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (5.6)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
           Natural Gas               December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $    40.6  $    26.0  $   200.1  $   183.6
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $    42.9  $    51.4  $   198.9  $   216.7
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
            Marketing                December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating loss                   $    (1.4) $    (0.4) $   (11.4) $    (0.8)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                          -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income loss   $    (1.4) $    (1.2) $    (8.3) $    (1.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
         Adjusted EBITDA             December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net cash provided by operating
 activities                      $   142.7  $   393.0  $   851.0  $ 1,045.6
Changes in operating assets and
 liabilities, net of cash
 acquired                             65.5       36.0      180.9      111.0
Interest expense (1)                  75.4       83.7      324.0      319.8
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
Line 6B insurance recoveries
 received (2)                        (20.0)    (235.0)    (220.0)    (285.0)
Settlement of interest rate
 swaps/treasury locks                    -          -          -       18.8
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual weather
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Other                                  6.6       (7.7)      (3.0)     (20.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted EBITDA                  $   267.5  $   295.4  $ 1,144.1  $ 1,182.9
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

(1) Interest expense excludes unrealized mark-to-market net losses of $20.8
    million and $21.0 for the three and twelve month periods ended December
    31, 2012, respectively. Excluded from interest expense for the three and
    twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 are unrealized mark-to-
    market net losses of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

(2) Excludes $50.0 million of insurance recoveries for the year ended
    December 31, 2011, which were accrued at December 31, 2011. These
    insurance recoveries were received in the first quarter of 2012 and are
    included in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012.

About Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (www.enbridgepartners.com) owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest transporter of growing oil production from western Canada. The system's deliveries to refining centers and connected carriers in the United States account for approximately 15 percent of total U.S. oil imports, while deliveries to Ontario, Canada satisfy approximately 70 percent of refinery demand in that region. The Partnership's natural gas gathering, treating, processing and transmission assets, which are principally located onshore in the active U.S. Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas, deliver approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (www.enbridgemanagement.com) manages the business and affairs of the Partnership, and its sole asset is an approximate 13 percent interest in the Partnership. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, (NYSE: ENB) (TSX: ENB) (www.enbridge.com), is the general partner of the Partnership and holds an approximate 22 percent interest in the Partnership.

LEGAL NOTICE

This news release includes forward-looking statements and projections, which are statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements frequently use the following words, variations thereon or comparable terminology: "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Enbridge Partners' ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and NGLs, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) Enbridge Partners' ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline systems; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at facilities of Enbridge Partners or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which Enbridge Partners transports products or to whom Enbridge Partners sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to Enbridge Partners' tariff rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which Enbridge Partners is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Reference should also be made to Enbridge Partners' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and its subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, for additional factors that may affect results. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site (www.sec.gov) and at the Partnership's web site.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
Code Halos - aka "digital fingerprints" - are the key organizing principle to understand a) how dumb things become smart and b) how to monetize this dynamic. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robert Brown, AVP, Center for the Future of Work at Cognizant Technology Solutions, outlined research, analysis and recommendations from his recently published book on this phenomena on the way leading edge organizations like GE and Disney are unlocking the Internet of Things opportunity and what steps your organization should be taking to position itself for the next platform of digital competition.
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect at GE, and Ibrahim Gokcen, who leads GE's advanced IoT analytics, focused on the Internet of Things / Industrial Internet and how to make it operational for business end-users. Learn about the challenges posed by machine and sensor data and how to marry it with enterprise data. They also discussed the tips and tricks to provide the Industrial Internet as an end-user consumable service using Big Data Analytics and Industrial Cloud.
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
IoT is still a vague buzzword for many people. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Kavis, Vice President & Principal Cloud Architect at Cloud Technology Partners, discussed the business value of IoT that goes far beyond the general public's perception that IoT is all about wearables and home consumer services. He also discussed how IoT is perceived by investors and how venture capitalist access this space. Other topics discussed were barriers to success, what is new, what is old, and what the future may hold. Mike Kavis is Vice President & Principal Cloud Architect at Cloud Technology Pa...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly in the process of breaking from its heretofore relatively obscure enterprise applications (such as plant floor control and supply chain management) and going mainstream into the consumer space. More and more creative folks are interconnecting everyday products such as household items, mobile devices, appliances and cars, and unleashing new and imaginative scenarios. We are seeing a lot of excitement around applications in home automation, personal fitness, and in-car entertainment and this excitement will bleed into other areas. On the commercial side, m...
Dale Kim is the Director of Industry Solutions at MapR. His background includes a variety of technical and management roles at information technology companies. While his experience includes work with relational databases, much of his career pertains to non-relational data in the areas of search, content management, and NoSQL, and includes senior roles in technical marketing, sales engineering, and support engineering. Dale holds an MBA from Santa Clara University, and a BA in Computer Science from the University of California, Berkeley.
Almost everyone sees the potential of Internet of Things but how can businesses truly unlock that potential. The key will be in the ability to discover business insight in the midst of an ocean of Big Data generated from billions of embedded devices via Systems of Discover. Businesses will also need to ensure that they can sustain that insight by leveraging the cloud for global reach, scale and elasticity.
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
"People are a lot more knowledgeable about APIs now. There are two types of people who work with APIs - IT people who want to use APIs for something internal and the product managers who want to do something outside APIs for people to connect to them," explained Roberto Medrano, Executive Vice President at SOA Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at Cloud Expo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Performance is the intersection of power, agility, control, and choice. If you value performance, and more specifically consistent performance, you need to look beyond simple virtualized compute. Many factors need to be considered to create a truly performant environment. In his General Session at 15th Cloud Expo, Harold Hannon, Sr. Software Architect at SoftLayer, discussed how to take advantage of a multitude of compute options and platform features to make cloud the cornerstone of your online presence.
SYS-CON Media announced that Splunk, a provider of the leading software platform for real-time Operational Intelligence, has launched an ad campaign on Big Data Journal. Splunk software and cloud services enable organizations to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine-generated big data coming from websites, applications, servers, networks, sensors and mobile devices. The ads focus on delivering ROI - how improved uptime delivered $6M in annual ROI, improving customer operations by mining large volumes of unstructured data, and how data tracking delivers uptime when it matters most.
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
Since 2008 and for the first time in history, more than half of humans live in urban areas, urging cities to become “smart.” Today, cities can leverage the wide availability of smartphones combined with new technologies such as Beacons or NFC to connect their urban furniture and environment to create citizen-first services that improve transportation, way-finding and information delivery. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Laetitia Gazel-Anthoine, CEO of Connecthings, will focus on successful use cases.
DevOps Summit 2015 New York, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that it is now accepting Keynote Proposals. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long development cycles that produce software that is obsolete at launch. DevOps may be disruptive, but it is essential.
“With easy-to-use SDKs for Atmel’s platforms, IoT developers can now reap the benefits of realtime communication, and bypass the security pitfalls and configuration complexities that put IoT deployments at risk,” said Todd Greene, founder & CEO of PubNub. PubNub will team with Atmel at CES 2015 to launch full SDK support for Atmel’s MCU, MPU, and Wireless SoC platforms. Atmel developers now have access to PubNub’s secure Publish/Subscribe messaging with guaranteed ¼ second latencies across PubNub’s 14 global points-of-presence. PubNub delivers secure communication through firewalls, proxy ser...
The industrial software market has treated data with the mentality of “collect everything now, worry about how to use it later.” We now find ourselves buried in data, with the pervasive connectivity of the (Industrial) Internet of Things only piling on more numbers. There’s too much data and not enough information. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Bob Gates, Global Marketing Director, GE’s Intelligent Platforms business, to discuss how realizing the power of IoT, software developers are now focused on understanding how industrial data can create intelligence for industrial operations. Imagine ...
The true value of the Internet of Things (IoT) lies not just in the data, but through the services that protect the data, perform the analysis and present findings in a usable way. With many IoT elements rooted in traditional IT components, Big Data and IoT isn’t just a play for enterprise. In fact, the IoT presents SMBs with the prospect of launching entirely new activities and exploring innovative areas. CompTIA research identifies several areas where IoT is expected to have the greatest impact.
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.