Welcome!

Microsoft Cloud Authors: Pat Romanski, Lori MacVittie, Andreas Grabner, Jim Kaskade, John Basso

News Feed Item

Enbridge Energy Partners Reports 2012 Earnings and Announces 2013 Financial Guidance

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwire) -- 02/13/13 -- Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.'s (NYSE: EEP) ("Enbridge Partners" or "the Partnership") key financial results for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, were as follows:


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
                                      December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income                       $     54.3 $    227.4 $    493.1 $    624.0
Net income per unit                    0.07       0.64       1.27       1.99
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Adjusted EBITDA (1)                   267.5      295.4    1,144.1    1,182.9
Adjusted net income                    87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Adjusted net income per unit           0.18       0.32       0.99       1.39
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(1) Includes non-controlling interest.

Adjusted net income for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012, reported above, eliminates the impact of: (a) additional environmental costs, net of insurance recoveries, associated with the incidents on Lines 14 and 6B; and (b) non-cash, mark-to-market net gains and losses; among other adjustments. Refer to the Non-GAAP Reconciliations table below for additional details.

Adjusted net income of $87.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $29.2 million lower than the same period from the prior year primarily due to lower natural gas liquids ("NGL") prices and increased operating and administrative expenses.

"Adjusted earnings for 2012 are not reflective of our expectations primarily as a result of weak natural gas and NGL prices that impacted our performance. While we believe natural gas and NGL fundamentals will gradually improve, we remain focused on our objective of delivering sustainable and prudent growth to our unitholders," said Mark Maki, President of the Partnership. "Above all else, Enbridge and the Partnership are committed to achieving industry leadership in the areas of safety and integrity and we continue to make the operating and capital investments necessary to achieve this objective," added Maki.

"The long-term outlook for the Partnership remains strong. Our $8.5 billion secured growth program is proceeding on schedule and will progressively transform the Partnership towards an even lower risk business model as the cash flows are secured predominantly by long-term, low-risk commercial frameworks such as cost-of-service or demand-based contract structures. The Partnership's distributable cash flow growth will begin to accelerate once these accretive growth projects enter service, which will solidify our long-term distribution growth outlook of 2 to 5 percent annually. We expect business fundamentals will continue to improve later in 2013. As a result, we estimate the Partnership's EBITDA for 2013 will increase in excess of 10% and will be between $1,250 million and $1,350 million," noted Maki.


COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
                                     December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating revenue                $ 1,771.2  $ 2,076.7  $ 6,706.1  $ 9,109.8
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas              1,249.4    1,603.9    4,570.1    7,100.1
  Environmental costs, net of
   recoveries                         17.7     (158.1)     (91.3)    (113.3)
  Oil measurement adjustments         (2.4)      (1.9)     (11.5)     (63.4)
  Operating and administrative       224.5      189.0      852.0      705.0
  Power                               32.2       37.6      148.8      144.8
  Depreciation and amortization       88.3       82.9      344.8      339.8
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                     161.5      323.3      893.2      996.8
Interest expense                      96.2       84.0      345.0      320.6
Other income                           5.6        0.5       10.0        6.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Income before income tax expense      70.9      239.8      558.2      682.7
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                            69.2      239.6      550.1      677.2
Less: Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest              14.9       12.2       57.0       53.2
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net income attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interests in Enbridge
 Energy Partners, L.P.           $    54.3  $   227.4  $   493.1  $   624.0
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.2       52.4      123.9      103.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income allocable to Limited
 Partners                        $    23.1  $   175.0  $   369.2  $   520.5
Weighted average Limited Partner
 units (millions)                    302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income per Limited Partner
 unit (dollars)                  $    0.07  $    0.64  $    1.27  $    1.99
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Following are explanations for significant changes in the Partnership's financial results, comparing the three month period ended December 31, 2012 with the same period of 2011. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
    Adjusted Operating Income        December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Liquids                          $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
Natural Gas                           42.9       51.4      198.9      216.7
Marketing                             (1.4)      (1.2)      (8.3)      (1.5)
Corporate                             (0.9)       0.3       (2.3)      (2.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   173.6  $   212.0  $   789.3  $   840.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Liquids - For the three month period ended December 31, 2012, adjusted operating income for the Liquids segment decreased $28.5 million from $161.5 million for December 31, 2011 to $133.0 million. Higher revenues from an increase in index transportation rates, in addition to higher storage revenues from the Partnership's Cushing storage facilities, were more than offset by lower volumes on our liquids pipeline systems and higher operating and administrative expenses. The increase in operating and administrative expenses was attributable to higher pipeline integrity costs, higher depreciation expense related to assets placed into service and an increase in workforce related costs. Additionally, fourth quarter 2012 results reflected approximately $9 million of costs to complete remediation of crude oil releases, primarily around our terminals.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Liquids Systems Volumes          December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(thousand barrels per day)          2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Lakehead                              1,737      1,742      1,790      1,700
Mid-Continent                           207        228        223        226
North Dakota                            173        219        206        197
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                                 2,117      2,189      2,219      2,123
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Natural Gas - Adjusted operating income for the Natural Gas segment was $42.9 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, which was $8.5 million lower than the same period in 2011. Fourth quarter 2012 adjusted operating income was impacted by lower revenues due to lower natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, lower volumes on our East Texas system and higher operating and administrative expenses.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Natural Gas Throughput           December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(MMBtu per day)                     2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
East Texas                        1,233,000  1,335,000  1,266,000  1,378,000
Anadarko                            998,000  1,030,000  1,017,000  1,013,000
North Texas                         333,000    327,000    330,000    337,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                             2,564,000  2,692,000  2,613,000  2,728,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Marketing - The Marketing segment reported an adjusted operating loss of $1.4 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.2 million from the $1.2 million of adjusted operating loss for the same period of 2011. The gas marketing business continues to be impacted by a weak natural gas pricing environment and narrow locational basis differentials.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2013 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
Enbridge Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and present its 2013 financial guidance in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2013. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

EEP Events and Presentations:
www.enbridgepartners.com/Investor-Relations/EEP/Events-and-Presentations/

Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/7sorrxmc

The audio portion of the presentation will be accessible by telephone at (877) 299-4454 (Passcode: 37159171) and can be replayed until May 14, 2013 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 59784432). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
        Adjusted Earnings            December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                       $    69.2  $   239.6  $   550.1  $   677.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses
  -Liquids                             1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
  -Natural Gas                         6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
  -Marketing                             -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
  -Corporate                          20.8        0.3       21.0        0.8
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest             (14.9)     (12.2)     (57.0)     (53.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income                   87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.9       27.6      122.2      100.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income allocable to
 Limited Partners                     55.3       88.8      288.0      364.3
Weighted average units
 (millions)                          302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income per Limited
 Partner unit (dollars)          $    0.18  $    0.32  $    0.99  $    1.39
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------



                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
             Liquids                 December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $   123.2  $   297.4  $   706.8  $   816.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (5.6)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
           Natural Gas               December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $    40.6  $    26.0  $   200.1  $   183.6
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $    42.9  $    51.4  $   198.9  $   216.7
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
            Marketing                December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating loss                   $    (1.4) $    (0.4) $   (11.4) $    (0.8)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                          -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income loss   $    (1.4) $    (1.2) $    (8.3) $    (1.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
         Adjusted EBITDA             December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net cash provided by operating
 activities                      $   142.7  $   393.0  $   851.0  $ 1,045.6
Changes in operating assets and
 liabilities, net of cash
 acquired                             65.5       36.0      180.9      111.0
Interest expense (1)                  75.4       83.7      324.0      319.8
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
Line 6B insurance recoveries
 received (2)                        (20.0)    (235.0)    (220.0)    (285.0)
Settlement of interest rate
 swaps/treasury locks                    -          -          -       18.8
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual weather
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Other                                  6.6       (7.7)      (3.0)     (20.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted EBITDA                  $   267.5  $   295.4  $ 1,144.1  $ 1,182.9
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

(1) Interest expense excludes unrealized mark-to-market net losses of $20.8
    million and $21.0 for the three and twelve month periods ended December
    31, 2012, respectively. Excluded from interest expense for the three and
    twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 are unrealized mark-to-
    market net losses of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

(2) Excludes $50.0 million of insurance recoveries for the year ended
    December 31, 2011, which were accrued at December 31, 2011. These
    insurance recoveries were received in the first quarter of 2012 and are
    included in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012.

About Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (www.enbridgepartners.com) owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest transporter of growing oil production from western Canada. The system's deliveries to refining centers and connected carriers in the United States account for approximately 15 percent of total U.S. oil imports, while deliveries to Ontario, Canada satisfy approximately 70 percent of refinery demand in that region. The Partnership's natural gas gathering, treating, processing and transmission assets, which are principally located onshore in the active U.S. Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas, deliver approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (www.enbridgemanagement.com) manages the business and affairs of the Partnership, and its sole asset is an approximate 13 percent interest in the Partnership. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, (NYSE: ENB) (TSX: ENB) (www.enbridge.com), is the general partner of the Partnership and holds an approximate 22 percent interest in the Partnership.

LEGAL NOTICE

This news release includes forward-looking statements and projections, which are statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements frequently use the following words, variations thereon or comparable terminology: "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Enbridge Partners' ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and NGLs, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) Enbridge Partners' ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline systems; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at facilities of Enbridge Partners or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which Enbridge Partners transports products or to whom Enbridge Partners sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to Enbridge Partners' tariff rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which Enbridge Partners is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Reference should also be made to Enbridge Partners' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and its subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, for additional factors that may affect results. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site (www.sec.gov) and at the Partnership's web site.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
An IoT product’s log files speak volumes about what’s happening with your products in the field, pinpointing current and potential issues, and enabling you to predict failures and save millions of dollars in inventory. But until recently, no one knew how to listen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Dan Gettens, Chief Research Officer at OnProcess, discussed recent research by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and OnProcess Technology, where MIT created a new, breakthrough analytics model for ...
IoT is rapidly changing the way enterprises are using data to improve business decision-making. In order to derive business value, organizations must unlock insights from the data gathered and then act on these. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, and Peter Shashkin, Head of Development Department at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how one organization leveraged IoT, cloud technology and data analysis to improve customer experiences and effici...
Everyone knows that truly innovative companies learn as they go along, pushing boundaries in response to market changes and demands. What's more of a mystery is how to balance innovation on a fresh platform built from scratch with the legacy tech stack, product suite and customers that continue to serve as the business' foundation. In his General Session at 19th Cloud Expo, Michael Chambliss, Head of Engineering at ReadyTalk, discussed why and how ReadyTalk diverted from healthy revenue and mor...
The 20th International Cloud Expo has announced that its Call for Papers is open. Cloud Expo, to be held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, brings together Cloud Computing, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, Containers, Microservices and WebRTC to one location. With cloud computing driving a higher percentage of enterprise IT budgets every year, it becomes increasingly important to plant your flag in this fast-expanding business opportunity. Submit your speaking proposal ...
In this strange new world where more and more power is drawn from business technology, companies are effectively straddling two paths on the road to innovation and transformation into digital enterprises. The first path is the heritage trail – with “legacy” technology forming the background. Here, extant technologies are transformed by core IT teams to provide more API-driven approaches. Legacy systems can restrict companies that are transitioning into digital enterprises. To truly become a lead...
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to simplify and streamline our lives by automating routine tasks that distract us from our goals. This promise is based on the ubiquitous deployment of smart, connected devices that link everything from industrial control systems to automobiles to refrigerators. Unfortunately, comparatively few of the devices currently deployed have been developed with an eye toward security, and as the DDoS attacks of late October 2016 have demonstrated, this oversight can ...
You have great SaaS business app ideas. You want to turn your idea quickly into a functional and engaging proof of concept. You need to be able to modify it to meet customers' needs, and you need to deliver a complete and secure SaaS application. How could you achieve all the above and yet avoid unforeseen IT requirements that add unnecessary cost and complexity? You also want your app to be responsive in any device at any time. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Mark Allen, General Manager of...
Bert Loomis was a visionary. This general session will highlight how Bert Loomis and people like him inspire us to build great things with small inventions. In their general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Harold Hannon, Architect at IBM Bluemix, and Michael O'Neill, Strategic Business Development at Nvidia, discussed the accelerating pace of AI development and how IBM Cloud and NVIDIA are partnering to bring AI capabilities to "every day," on-demand. They also reviewed two "free infrastructure" pr...
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
"Dice has been around for the last 20 years. We have been helping tech professionals find new jobs and career opportunities," explained Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Extracting business value from Internet of Things (IoT) data doesn’t happen overnight. There are several requirements that must be satisfied, including IoT device enablement, data analysis, real-time detection of complex events and automated orchestration of actions. Unfortunately, too many companies fall short in achieving their business goals by implementing incomplete solutions or not focusing on tangible use cases. In his general session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products...
"ReadyTalk is an audio and web video conferencing provider. We've really come to embrace WebRTC as the platform for our future of technology," explained Dan Cunningham, CTO of ReadyTalk, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at WebRTC Summit at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The many IoT deployments around the world are busy integrating smart devices and sensors into their enterprise IT infrastructures. Yet all of this technology – and there are an amazing number of choices – is of no use without the software to gather, communicate, and analyze the new data flows. Without software, there is no IT. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation; Alan Williamson, Principal...
Businesses and business units of all sizes can benefit from cloud computing, but many don't want the cost, performance and security concerns of public cloud nor the complexity of building their own private clouds. Today, some cloud vendors are using artificial intelligence (AI) to simplify cloud deployment and management. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Ajay Gulati, Co-founder and CEO of ZeroStack, will discuss how AI can simplify cloud operations. He will cover the following topics: why clou...
Video experiences should be unique and exciting! But that doesn’t mean you need to patch all the pieces yourself. Users demand rich and engaging experiences and new ways to connect with you. But creating robust video applications at scale can be complicated, time-consuming and expensive. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Zohar Babin, Vice President of Platform, Ecosystem and Community at Kaltura, discussed how VPaaS enables you to move fast, creating scalable video experiences that reach your aud...
WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web communications world. The 6th WebRTC Summit continues our tradition of delivering the latest and greatest presentations within the world of WebRTC. Topics include voice calling, video chat, P2P file sharing, and use cases that have already leveraged the power and convenience of WebRTC.
"At ROHA we develop an app called Catcha. It was developed after we spent a year meeting with, talking to, interacting with senior citizens watching them use their smartphones and talking to them about how they use their smartphones so we could get to know their smartphone behavior," explained Dave Woods, Chief Innovation Officer at ROHA, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
20th Cloud Expo, taking place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud strategy.
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life sett...
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...