Welcome!

Microsoft Cloud Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, Liz McMillan, Mihai Corbuleac, David Bermingham

News Feed Item

Enbridge Energy Partners Reports 2012 Earnings and Announces 2013 Financial Guidance

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwire) -- 02/13/13 -- Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.'s (NYSE: EEP) ("Enbridge Partners" or "the Partnership") key financial results for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, were as follows:


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
                                      December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income                       $     54.3 $    227.4 $    493.1 $    624.0
Net income per unit                    0.07       0.64       1.27       1.99
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Adjusted EBITDA (1)                   267.5      295.4    1,144.1    1,182.9
Adjusted net income                    87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Adjusted net income per unit           0.18       0.32       0.99       1.39
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(1) Includes non-controlling interest.

Adjusted net income for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012, reported above, eliminates the impact of: (a) additional environmental costs, net of insurance recoveries, associated with the incidents on Lines 14 and 6B; and (b) non-cash, mark-to-market net gains and losses; among other adjustments. Refer to the Non-GAAP Reconciliations table below for additional details.

Adjusted net income of $87.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $29.2 million lower than the same period from the prior year primarily due to lower natural gas liquids ("NGL") prices and increased operating and administrative expenses.

"Adjusted earnings for 2012 are not reflective of our expectations primarily as a result of weak natural gas and NGL prices that impacted our performance. While we believe natural gas and NGL fundamentals will gradually improve, we remain focused on our objective of delivering sustainable and prudent growth to our unitholders," said Mark Maki, President of the Partnership. "Above all else, Enbridge and the Partnership are committed to achieving industry leadership in the areas of safety and integrity and we continue to make the operating and capital investments necessary to achieve this objective," added Maki.

"The long-term outlook for the Partnership remains strong. Our $8.5 billion secured growth program is proceeding on schedule and will progressively transform the Partnership towards an even lower risk business model as the cash flows are secured predominantly by long-term, low-risk commercial frameworks such as cost-of-service or demand-based contract structures. The Partnership's distributable cash flow growth will begin to accelerate once these accretive growth projects enter service, which will solidify our long-term distribution growth outlook of 2 to 5 percent annually. We expect business fundamentals will continue to improve later in 2013. As a result, we estimate the Partnership's EBITDA for 2013 will increase in excess of 10% and will be between $1,250 million and $1,350 million," noted Maki.


COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
                                     December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating revenue                $ 1,771.2  $ 2,076.7  $ 6,706.1  $ 9,109.8
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas              1,249.4    1,603.9    4,570.1    7,100.1
  Environmental costs, net of
   recoveries                         17.7     (158.1)     (91.3)    (113.3)
  Oil measurement adjustments         (2.4)      (1.9)     (11.5)     (63.4)
  Operating and administrative       224.5      189.0      852.0      705.0
  Power                               32.2       37.6      148.8      144.8
  Depreciation and amortization       88.3       82.9      344.8      339.8
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                     161.5      323.3      893.2      996.8
Interest expense                      96.2       84.0      345.0      320.6
Other income                           5.6        0.5       10.0        6.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Income before income tax expense      70.9      239.8      558.2      682.7
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                            69.2      239.6      550.1      677.2
Less: Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest              14.9       12.2       57.0       53.2
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net income attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interests in Enbridge
 Energy Partners, L.P.           $    54.3  $   227.4  $   493.1  $   624.0
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.2       52.4      123.9      103.5
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income allocable to Limited
 Partners                        $    23.1  $   175.0  $   369.2  $   520.5
Weighted average Limited Partner
 units (millions)                    302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income per Limited Partner
 unit (dollars)                  $    0.07  $    0.64  $    1.27  $    1.99
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Following are explanations for significant changes in the Partnership's financial results, comparing the three month period ended December 31, 2012 with the same period of 2011. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
    Adjusted Operating Income        December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Liquids                          $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
Natural Gas                           42.9       51.4      198.9      216.7
Marketing                             (1.4)      (1.2)      (8.3)      (1.5)
Corporate                             (0.9)       0.3       (2.3)      (2.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   173.6  $   212.0  $   789.3  $   840.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Liquids - For the three month period ended December 31, 2012, adjusted operating income for the Liquids segment decreased $28.5 million from $161.5 million for December 31, 2011 to $133.0 million. Higher revenues from an increase in index transportation rates, in addition to higher storage revenues from the Partnership's Cushing storage facilities, were more than offset by lower volumes on our liquids pipeline systems and higher operating and administrative expenses. The increase in operating and administrative expenses was attributable to higher pipeline integrity costs, higher depreciation expense related to assets placed into service and an increase in workforce related costs. Additionally, fourth quarter 2012 results reflected approximately $9 million of costs to complete remediation of crude oil releases, primarily around our terminals.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Liquids Systems Volumes          December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(thousand barrels per day)          2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Lakehead                              1,737      1,742      1,790      1,700
Mid-Continent                           207        228        223        226
North Dakota                            173        219        206        197
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                                 2,117      2,189      2,219      2,123
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Natural Gas - Adjusted operating income for the Natural Gas segment was $42.9 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, which was $8.5 million lower than the same period in 2011. Fourth quarter 2012 adjusted operating income was impacted by lower revenues due to lower natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, lower volumes on our East Texas system and higher operating and administrative expenses.


                                   Three months ended   Twelve months ended
     Natural Gas Throughput           December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------- ---------------------
(MMBtu per day)                     2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
East Texas                        1,233,000  1,335,000  1,266,000  1,378,000
Anadarko                            998,000  1,030,000  1,017,000  1,013,000
North Texas                         333,000    327,000    330,000    337,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total                             2,564,000  2,692,000  2,613,000  2,728,000
                                 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Marketing - The Marketing segment reported an adjusted operating loss of $1.4 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.2 million from the $1.2 million of adjusted operating loss for the same period of 2011. The gas marketing business continues to be impacted by a weak natural gas pricing environment and narrow locational basis differentials.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2013 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
Enbridge Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and present its 2013 financial guidance in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2013. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

EEP Events and Presentations:
www.enbridgepartners.com/Investor-Relations/EEP/Events-and-Presentations/

Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/7sorrxmc

The audio portion of the presentation will be accessible by telephone at (877) 299-4454 (Passcode: 37159171) and can be replayed until May 14, 2013 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 59784432). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
        Adjusted Earnings            December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)           2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income                       $    69.2  $   239.6  $   550.1  $   677.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses
  -Liquids                             1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
  -Natural Gas                         6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
  -Marketing                             -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
  -Corporate                          20.8        0.3       21.0        0.8
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Net income attributable to
 noncontrolling interest             (14.9)     (12.2)     (57.0)     (53.2)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income                   87.2      116.4      410.2      464.6
Less: Allocations to General
 Partner                              31.9       27.6      122.2      100.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income allocable to
 Limited Partners                     55.3       88.8      288.0      364.3
Weighted average units
 (millions)                          302.9      276.4      290.6      262.3
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted net income per Limited
 Partner unit (dollars)          $    0.18  $    0.32  $    0.99  $    1.39
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------



                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
             Liquids                 December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $   123.2  $   297.4  $   706.8  $   816.2
Lines 6A and 6B incident
 expenses, net of recoveries          10.0     (160.0)    (115.0)    (117.0)
Line 14 incident liability and
 lost revenues                        (1.6)         -       10.5          -
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (5.6)
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        1.4       24.1       (1.3)     (14.4)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $   133.0  $   161.5  $   601.0  $   627.0
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
           Natural Gas               December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating income                 $    40.6  $    26.0  $   200.1  $   183.6
Impact from unusual winter
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                        6.7        0.2       (4.3)     (15.8)
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income        $    42.9  $    51.4  $   198.9  $   216.7
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
            Marketing                December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Operating loss                   $    (1.4) $    (0.4) $   (11.4) $    (0.8)
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                          -       (0.8)       3.1       (0.7)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted operating income loss   $    (1.4) $    (1.2) $    (8.3) $    (1.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


                                  Three months ended    Twelve months ended
         Adjusted EBITDA             December 31,          December 31,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net cash provided by operating
 activities                      $   142.7  $   393.0  $   851.0  $ 1,045.6
Changes in operating assets and
 liabilities, net of cash
 acquired                             65.5       36.0      180.9      111.0
Interest expense (1)                  75.4       83.7      324.0      319.8
Income tax expense                     1.7        0.2        8.1        5.5
Line 6B insurance recoveries
 received (2)                        (20.0)    (235.0)    (220.0)    (285.0)
Settlement of interest rate
 swaps/treasury locks                    -          -          -       18.8
Oil measurement adjustments              -          -          -      (52.2)
Impact from unusual weather
 conditions                              -          -          -        9.2
Option premiums                       (0.1)       6.8       (4.3)       6.8
Lawsuit settlement                       -          -          -       (9.0)
Trucking and NGL Marketing legal
 and audit costs                         -          -        7.4          -
Trucking and NGL Marketing prior
 period adjustment                       -       18.4          -       32.9
Noncash lower cost or market          (4.3)         -          -          -
Other                                  6.6       (7.7)      (3.0)     (20.5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Adjusted EBITDA                  $   267.5  $   295.4  $ 1,144.1  $ 1,182.9
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

(1) Interest expense excludes unrealized mark-to-market net losses of $20.8
    million and $21.0 for the three and twelve month periods ended December
    31, 2012, respectively. Excluded from interest expense for the three and
    twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 are unrealized mark-to-
    market net losses of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

(2) Excludes $50.0 million of insurance recoveries for the year ended
    December 31, 2011, which were accrued at December 31, 2011. These
    insurance recoveries were received in the first quarter of 2012 and are
    included in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012.

About Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (www.enbridgepartners.com) owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest transporter of growing oil production from western Canada. The system's deliveries to refining centers and connected carriers in the United States account for approximately 15 percent of total U.S. oil imports, while deliveries to Ontario, Canada satisfy approximately 70 percent of refinery demand in that region. The Partnership's natural gas gathering, treating, processing and transmission assets, which are principally located onshore in the active U.S. Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast areas, deliver approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (www.enbridgemanagement.com) manages the business and affairs of the Partnership, and its sole asset is an approximate 13 percent interest in the Partnership. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Enbridge Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, (NYSE: ENB) (TSX: ENB) (www.enbridge.com), is the general partner of the Partnership and holds an approximate 22 percent interest in the Partnership.

LEGAL NOTICE

This news release includes forward-looking statements and projections, which are statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements frequently use the following words, variations thereon or comparable terminology: "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Enbridge Partners' ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and NGLs, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) Enbridge Partners' ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline systems; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at facilities of Enbridge Partners or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which Enbridge Partners transports products or to whom Enbridge Partners sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to Enbridge Partners' tariff rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which Enbridge Partners is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Reference should also be made to Enbridge Partners' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and its subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, for additional factors that may affect results. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site (www.sec.gov) and at the Partnership's web site.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Machine Learning helps make complex systems more efficient. By applying advanced Machine Learning techniques such as Cognitive Fingerprinting, wind project operators can utilize these tools to learn from collected data, detect regular patterns, and optimize their own operations. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Stuart Gillen, Director of Business Development at SparkCognition, discussed how research has demonstrated the value of Machine Learning in delivering next generation analytics to imp...
The cloud promises new levels of agility and cost-savings for Big Data, data warehousing and analytics. But it’s challenging to understand all the options – from IaaS and PaaS to newer services like HaaS (Hadoop as a Service) and BDaaS (Big Data as a Service). In her session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Hannah Smalltree, a director at Cazena, provided an educational overview of emerging “as-a-service” options for Big Data in the cloud. This is critical background for IT and data profession...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, wh...
Whether your IoT service is connecting cars, homes, appliances, wearable, cameras or other devices, one question hangs in the balance – how do you actually make money from this service? The ability to turn your IoT service into profit requires the ability to create a monetization strategy that is flexible, scalable and working for you in real-time. It must be a transparent, smoothly implemented strategy that all stakeholders – from customers to the board – will be able to understand and comprehe...
When people aren’t talking about VMs and containers, they’re talking about serverless architecture. Serverless is about no maintenance. It means you are not worried about low-level infrastructural and operational details. An event-driven serverless platform is a great use case for IoT. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Animesh Singh, an STSM and Lead for IBM Cloud Platform and Infrastructure, will detail how to build a distributed serverless, polyglot, microservices framework using open source tec...
Connected devices and the industrial internet are growing exponentially every year with Cisco expecting 50 billion devices to be in operation by 2020. In this period of growth, location-based insights are becoming invaluable to many businesses as they adopt new connected technologies. Knowing when and where these devices connect from is critical for a number of scenarios in supply chain management, disaster management, emergency response, M2M, location marketing and more. In his session at @Th...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life sett...
Cloud Expo, Inc. has announced today that Andi Mann returns to 'DevOps at Cloud Expo 2016' as Conference Chair The @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo will take place on November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. "DevOps is set to be one of the most profound disruptions to hit IT in decades," said Andi Mann. "It is a natural extension of cloud computing, and I have seen both firsthand and in independent research the fantastic results DevOps delivers. So I am excited t...
"We work in the area of Big Data analytics and Big Data analytics is a very crowded space - you have Hadoop, ETL, warehousing, visualization and there's a lot of effort trying to get these tools to talk to each other," explained Mukund Deshpande, head of the Analytics practice at Accelerite, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
"delaPlex is a software development company. We do team-based outsourcing development," explained Mark Rivers, COO and Co-founder of delaPlex Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
IoT is rapidly changing the way enterprises are using data to improve business decision-making. In order to derive business value, organizations must unlock insights from the data gathered and then act on these. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, and Peter Shashkin, Head of Development Department at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how one organization leveraged IoT, cloud technology and data analysis to improve customer experiences and effi...
Basho Technologies has announced the latest release of Basho Riak TS, version 1.3. Riak TS is an enterprise-grade NoSQL database optimized for Internet of Things (IoT). The open source version enables developers to download the software for free and use it in production as well as make contributions to the code and develop applications around Riak TS. Enhancements to Riak TS make it quick, easy and cost-effective to spin up an instance to test new ideas and build IoT applications. In addition to...
The idea of comparing data in motion (at the sensor level) to data at rest (in a Big Data server warehouse) with predictive analytics in the cloud is very appealing to the industrial IoT sector. The problem Big Data vendors have, however, is access to that data in motion at the sensor location. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Scott Allen, CMO of FreeWave, discussed how as IoT is increasingly adopted by industrial markets, there is going to be an increased demand for sensor data from the outermos...
CenturyLink has announced that application server solutions from GENBAND are now available as part of CenturyLink’s Networx contracts. The General Services Administration (GSA)’s Networx program includes the largest telecommunications contract vehicles ever awarded by the federal government. CenturyLink recently secured an extension through spring 2020 of its offerings available to federal government agencies via GSA’s Networx Universal and Enterprise contracts. GENBAND’s EXPERiUS™ Application...
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
Presidio has received the 2015 EMC Partner Services Quality Award from EMC Corporation for achieving outstanding service excellence and customer satisfaction as measured by the EMC Partner Services Quality (PSQ) program. Presidio was also honored as the 2015 EMC Americas Marketing Excellence Partner of the Year and 2015 Mid-Market East Partner of the Year. The EMC PSQ program is a project-specific survey program designed for partners with Service Partner designations to solicit customer feedbac...
The IoT is changing the way enterprises conduct business. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how businesses can gain an edge over competitors by empowering consumers to take control through IoT. He cited examples such as a Washington, D.C.-based sports club that leveraged IoT and the cloud to develop a comprehensive booking system. He also highlighted how IoT can revitalize and restore outdated business models, making them profitable ...
There are several IoTs: the Industrial Internet, Consumer Wearables, Wearables and Healthcare, Supply Chains, and the movement toward Smart Grids, Cities, Regions, and Nations. There are competing communications standards every step of the way, a bewildering array of sensors and devices, and an entire world of competing data analytics platforms. To some this appears to be chaos. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, Bradley Holt, Developer Advocate a...
SYS-CON Events has announced today that Roger Strukhoff has been named conference chair of Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo 2016 Silicon Valley. The 19th Cloud Expo and 6th @ThingsExpo will take place on November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. "The Internet of Things brings trillions of dollars of opportunity to developers and enterprise IT, no matter how you measure it," stated Roger Strukhoff. "More importantly, it leverages the power of devices and the Interne...
In addition to all the benefits, IoT is also bringing new kind of customer experience challenges - cars that unlock themselves, thermostats turning houses into saunas and baby video monitors broadcasting over the internet. This list can only increase because while IoT services should be intuitive and simple to use, the delivery ecosystem is a myriad of potential problems as IoT explodes complexity. So finding a performance issue is like finding the proverbial needle in the haystack.