Click here to close now.


Microsoft Cloud Authors: Jordan Sanders, Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Keith Mayer, Jayaram Krishnaswamy

News Feed Item

Con Edison Reports 2012 Earnings

NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwire) -- 01/31/13 -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) today reported 2012 net income for common stock of $1,138 million or $3.88 a share compared with $1,051 million or $3.59 a share in 2011. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the net mark-to-market effects of the competitive energy businesses (CEBs), were $1,098 million or $3.75 a share in 2012 compared with $1,064 million or $3.64 a share in 2011.

For the fourth quarter of 2012, net income for common stock was $207 million or $0.71 a share compared with $190 million or $0.65 a share in the fourth quarter of 2011. Earnings from ongoing operations for the fourth quarter of 2012, which exclude the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs, were $203 million or $0.69 a share compared with $219 million or $0.74 a share in the fourth quarter of 2011.

"Our regulated utilities and competitive energy businesses continued to perform well in 2012," said Kevin Burke, Con Edison's chairman, president, and CEO. "We faced an unprecedented challenge with Superstorm Sandy, and our own workers were joined by utility workers from across the country and Canada to get over a million Con Edison and Orange and Rockland customers back online. We are grateful to all of our employees, mutual aid workers and first responders for their extraordinary efforts. We look forward to working with leaders of New York State, New York City, other local governments and community organizations to implement new investments and strategies in the wake of this historic storm."

Con Edison also announced that it is increasing its dividend for the 39th consecutive year. The company declared a quarterly dividend of 61 1/2 cents a share on its common stock, payable March 15, 2013 to shareholders of record as of February 13, 2013, an annualized increase of 4 cents over the previous annualized dividend of $2.42 a share. "The dividend reflects our continued emphasis on providing a return to our investors, who play an important role in raising capital to make infrastructure investments at the lowest cost to our customers," said Robert Hoglund, senior vice president and chief financial officer.

The following table is a reconciliation of Con Edison's reported earnings per share to earnings per share from ongoing operations and reported net income to earnings from ongoing operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

                        Three Months Ended               Year Ended
                     Earnings      Net Income     Earnings      Net Income
                        per       (Millions of       per       (Millions of
                       Share        Dollars)        Share        Dollars)
                   ------------  -------------  ------------  -------------
                    2012  2011    2012   2011    2012  2011    2012   2011
                   ----- ------  ------ ------  ----- ------  ------ ------
Reported earnings
 per share and net
 income for common
 stock - GAAP
 basis (basic)     $0.71 $ 0.65  $  207 $  190  $3.88 $ 3.59  $1,138 $1,051
Less: Net mark-to-
 market effects of
 the CEBs           0.02  (0.09)      4    (29)  0.13  (0.05)     40    (13)
                   ----- ------  ------ ------  ----- ------  ------ ------
Ongoing operations $0.69 $ 0.74  $  203 $  219  $3.75 $ 3.64  $1,098 $1,064
                   ===== ======  ====== ======  ===== ======  ====== ======

In January 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an October 2009 trial court ruling and disallowed company-claimed tax deductions relating to a 1997 transaction in which Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. leased property from the owner and then immediately subleased it back to the owner (a "lease in/lease out" transaction). As a result, the company expects to record an estimated charge of between $150 million and $170 million (after-tax) in the first quarter of 2013 to reflect the interest payment on disallowed federal income tax deductions and the recalculation of the accounting effect of the 1997 transaction and its 1999 lease in/lease out transaction. In addition, to defray interest charges, the company has made deposits of $447 million with federal and state tax agencies relating primarily to the potential tax liability from these transactions in past tax years and interest thereon. The transactions did not impact earnings in either 2012 or 2011.

The company expects its earnings from ongoing operations for the year 2013 to be in the range of $3.65 to $3.85 per share. This forecast reflects, among other things, estimated costs relating to Superstorm Sandy that the utility subsidiaries expect to incur in 2013 to restore their energy systems to normal operating condition and that new rate plans are not expected to become effective until 2014. The forecast excludes an estimated $0.50 to $0.60 per share charge relating to the disallowance of tax deductions associated with its lease in/lease out transactions discussed above and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

The forecast also reflects capital investments of $2,425 million, substantially all of which will be spent at the company's regulated utilities. The company expects to meet its 2013 external financing requirements, including for maturing securities, through the issuance of between $1,000 million and $1,500 million of long-term debt. In addition, the company is evaluating long-term debt financing for its solar projects. The company does not expect to need to issue additional common equity in 2013.

The results of operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with the 2011 periods, reflect changes in the rate plans of Con Edison's utility subsidiaries and the effect of the milder winter weather on steam revenues. The rate plans provide for additional revenues to cover expected increases in certain operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation. The results of operations include the operating results of the CEBs, including net mark-to-market effects.

Operations and maintenance expenses were higher in the 2012 periods due primarily to pension costs and the support and maintenance of company underground facilities to accommodate municipal projects. Depreciation and property taxes were higher in the 2012 periods, reflecting primarily higher utility plant balances.

Con Edison's utility subsidiaries, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY) and Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R), in the 2012 fourth quarter, incurred response and restoration costs for Superstorm Sandy of $363 million and $98 million, respectively (including capital expenditures of $104 million and $14 million, respectively). Most of the costs that were not capitalized were deferred as a regulatory asset under the utility subsidiaries' electric rate plans.

The following table presents the estimated effect on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the 2012 period compared with the 2011 period, resulting from these and other major factors:

                               Three Months Ended      Twelve Months Ended
                                    Variation               Variation
                                  2012 vs. 2011           2012 vs. 2011
                                         Net Income              Net Income
                                         for Common              for Common
                                            Stock                   Stock
                                          Variation               Variation
                               Earnings   (Millions    Earnings   (Millions
                              per Share      of       per Share      of
                              Variation   Dollars)    Variation   Dollars)
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
  Rate plans, primarily to
   recover increases in
   certain costs             $     0.23  $       67  $     0.90  $      263
  Weather impact on steam
   revenues                        0.03           8       (0.07)        (20)
  Operations and maintenance
   expense                        (0.14)        (41)      (0.47)       (137)
  Depreciation and property
   taxes                          (0.16)        (46)      (0.19)        (57)
  Other                            0.01           3       (0.05)        (13)
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Total CECONY                      (0.03)         (9)       0.12          36

O&R                                   -           -        0.04          11

CEBs (b)                           0.08          25        0.15          44

Other, including parent
 company expenses                  0.01           1       (0.02)         (4)
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Total variation              $     0.06  $       17  $     0.29  $       87
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

(a) Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY's electric and gas
    rate plans and the weather-normalization clause applicable to the gas
    business, revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery
    volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Under CECONY's
    rate plans, pension and other postretirement costs and certain other
    costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates for such costs.
(b) For the three months ended December 31, the variations reflect after-tax
    net mark-to-market gains of $4 million or $0.02 a share in 2012 and
    after-tax net mark-to-market losses of $29 million or $0.09 a share in
    2011. For the year ended December 31, the variations reflect after-tax
    net mark-to-market gains of $40 million or $0.13 a share in 2012 and
    after-tax net mark-to-market losses of $13 million or $0.05 a share in

The changes in the energy delivered by the company's utility subsidiaries, both for actual amounts and as adjusted for variations in weather and billing days, for the three months and year ended December 31, 2012, as compared with the 2011 period were as follows (expressed as a percentage of 2011 amounts):

                                 Fourth Quarter
                                    Variation            Year Variation
                                  2012 vs. 2011           2012 vs. 2011
                               Actual     Adjusted     Actual     Adjusted
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
  Electric                         (1.9)       (0.7)       (1.1)        0.2
  Firm - Gas                       13.1         0.4        (7.2)        0.6
  Steam                             5.3        (3.8)      (11.6)       (1.5)
  Electric                         (2.5)       (2.4)       (1.0)        0.8
  Firm - Gas                       15.6         3.3        (6.1)        1.4
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------

Refer to the attachment to this press release for the consolidated income statements for 2012 and 2011. Additional information related to utility sales and revenues is available at (select "Shareholder Services" and then select "Sales & Revenue Reports" under "Financial Reports").

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect expectations and not facts. Actual results may differ materially from those expectations because of factors such as those identified in reports the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This press release also contains a financial measure, earnings from ongoing operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income, which is an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. Management uses this non-GAAP measure to facilitate the analysis of the company's ongoing performance as compared to its internal budgets and previously reported financial results. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure also is useful and meaningful to investors.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $40 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through the following subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., a regulated utility providing electric, gas, and steam service in New York City and Westchester County, New York; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,350 square mile area in southeastern New York state and adjacent sections of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania; Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., a retail energy supply and services company; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy supply company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc., a company that participates in infrastructure projects.

                         CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

                                 For the Three Months      For the Years
                                  Ended December 31,    Ended December 31,
                                    2012       2011       2012       2011
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                   (Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)
  Electric                       $   2,003  $   1,983  $   8,765  $   8,866
  Gas                                  458        426      1,618      1,735
  Steam                                181        176        596        683
  Non-utility                          259        330      1,209      1,602
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES             2,901      2,915     12,188     12,886
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
  Purchased power                      676        843      3,116      3,967
  Fuel                                  97         95        310        412
  Gas purchased for resale             147        131        461        622
  Other operations and
   maintenance                         817        756      3,182      2,969
  Depreciation and amortization        246        225        955        884
  Taxes, other than income taxes       465        406      1,825      1,793
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES             2,448      2,456      9,849     10,647
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
OPERATING INCOME                       453        459      2,339      2,239
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
  Investment and other income            4          4         18         23
  Allowance for equity funds
   used during construction              1          4          4         11
  Other deductions                      (3)        (4)       (16)       (17)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)          2          4          6         17
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
  Interest on long-term debt           145        145        586        582
  Other interest                         4          3         20         18
  Allowance for borrowed funds
   used during construction             (1)        (2)        (2)        (6)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
NET INTEREST EXPENSE                   148        146        604        594
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE       307        317      1,741      1,662
INCOME TAX EXPENSE                     100        124        600        600
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
NET INCOME                             207        193      1,141      1,062
  Preferred stock dividend
   requirements of subsidiary            -         (3)        (3)       (11)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK      $     207  $     190  $   1,138  $   1,051
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========
Net income for common stock per
 common share - basic            $    0.71  $    0.65  $    3.88  $    3.59
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========
Net income for common stock per
 common share - diluted          $    0.70  $    0.65  $    3.86  $    3.57
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========
 MILLIONS)                           292.9      292.9      292.9      292.6
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========
 MILLIONS)                           294.5      294.8      294.5      294.4
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

Robert McGee

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi’s VP Business Development and Engineering, explored the IoT cloud-based platform technologies driving this change including privacy controls, data transparency and integration of real time context with p...
There are over 120 breakout sessions in all, with Keynotes, General Sessions, and Power Panels adding to three days of incredibly rich presentations and content. Join @ThingsExpo conference chair Roger Strukhoff (@IoT2040), June 7-9, 2016 in New York City, for three days of intense 'Internet of Things' discussion and focus, including Big Data's indespensable role in IoT, Smart Grids and Industrial Internet of Things, Wearables and Consumer IoT, as well as (new) IoT's use in Vertical Markets.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data shows "less than 10 percent of IoT developers are making enough to support a reasonably sized team....
We all know that data growth is exploding and storage budgets are shrinking. Instead of showing you charts on about how much data there is, in his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Scott Cleland, Senior Director of Product Marketing at HGST, showed how to capture all of your data in one place. After you have your data under control, you can then analyze it in one place, saving time and resources.
Just over a week ago I received a long and loud sustained applause for a presentation I delivered at this year’s Cloud Expo in Santa Clara. I was extremely pleased with the turnout and had some very good conversations with many of the attendees. Over the next few days I had many more meaningful conversations and was not only happy with the results but also learned a few new things. Here is everything I learned in those three days distilled into three short points.
As organizations realize the scope of the Internet of Things, gaining key insights from Big Data, through the use of advanced analytics, becomes crucial. However, IoT also creates the need for petabyte scale storage of data from millions of devices. A new type of Storage is required which seamlessly integrates robust data analytics with massive scale. These storage systems will act as “smart systems” provide in-place analytics that speed discovery and enable businesses to quickly derive meaningful and actionable insights. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Paul Turner, Chief Marketing Officer at...
DevOps is about increasing efficiency, but nothing is more inefficient than building the same application twice. However, this is a routine occurrence with enterprise applications that need both a rich desktop web interface and strong mobile support. With recent technological advances from Isomorphic Software and others, rich desktop and tuned mobile experiences can now be created with a single codebase – without compromising functionality, performance or usability. In his session at DevOps Summit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, demonstrated examples of com...
In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bruce Swann, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Campaign, explored the key ingredients of cross-channel marketing in a digital world. Learn how the Adobe Marketing Cloud can help marketers embrace opportunities for personalized, relevant and real-time customer engagement across offline (direct mail, point of sale, call center) and digital (email, website, SMS, mobile apps, social networks, connected objects).
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessions, I wanted to share some of my observations on emerging trends. As cyber security serves as a fou...
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, exploreed the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends and technology requirements that will drive the Internet of Things from hype to reality.
Continuous processes around the development and deployment of applications are both impacted by -- and a benefit to -- the Internet of Things trend. To help better understand the relationship between DevOps and a plethora of new end-devices and data please welcome Gary Gruver, consultant, author and a former IT executive who has led many large-scale IT transformation projects, and John Jeremiah, Technology Evangelist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), on Twitter at @j_jeremiah. The discussion is moderated by me, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now all corporate assets – people, objects, and spaces – can share information about themselves and thei...
PubNub has announced the release of BLOCKS, a set of customizable microservices that give developers a simple way to add code and deploy features for realtime apps.PubNub BLOCKS executes business logic directly on the data streaming through PubNub’s network without splitting it off to an intermediary server controlled by the customer. This revolutionary approach streamlines app development, reduces endpoint-to-endpoint latency, and allows apps to better leverage the enormous scalability of PubNub’s Data Stream Network.
I recently attended and was a speaker at the 4th International Internet of @ThingsExpo at the Santa Clara Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to attend this event last year and I wrote a blog from that show talking about how the “Enterprise Impact of IoT” was a key theme of last year’s show. I was curious to see if the same theme would still resonate 365 days later and what, if any, changes I would see in the content presented.
Apps and devices shouldn't stop working when there's limited or no network connectivity. Learn how to bring data stored in a cloud database to the edge of the network (and back again) whenever an Internet connection is available. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Ben Perlmutter, a Sales Engineer with IBM Cloudant, demonstrated techniques for replicating cloud databases with devices in order to build offline-first mobile or Internet of Things (IoT) apps that can provide a better, faster user experience, both offline and online. The focus of this talk was on IBM Cloudant, Apache CouchDB, and ...
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" in this scenario: microservice A (releases daily) depends on a couple of additions to backend B (re...
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true change and transformation possible.
Container technology is shaping the future of DevOps and it’s also changing the way organizations think about application development. With the rise of mobile applications in the enterprise, businesses are abandoning year-long development cycles and embracing technologies that enable rapid development and continuous deployment of apps. In his session at DevOps Summit, Kurt Collins, Developer Evangelist at, examined how Docker has evolved into a highly effective tool for application delivery by allowing increasingly popular Mobile Backend-as-a-Service (mBaaS) platforms to quickly crea...