Welcome!

.NET Authors: Pat Romanski, Srinivasan Sundara Rajan, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Jayaram Krishnaswamy, Jim Kaskade

News Feed Item

Bank of The James Reports Strong Year-Over-Year Earnings Growth in Fourth Quarter, Full-Year 2012 Financial Results

LYNCHBURG, VA -- (Marketwire) -- 01/25/13 -- Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BOTJ)

Financial Highlights

  • Net income in 2012 increased 255% to $2.13 million or $0.64 per fully diluted share, compared with net income in 2011 of $600,000 or $0.18 per fully diluted share.
  • Net income in fourth quarter 2012 was $747,000 or $0.22 fully diluted per share, compared with a fourth quarter 2011 net loss of $(218,000) or $(0.07) per fully diluted share.
  • The allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) to non-accruing loans increased to 87.22% at December 31, 2012, compared with 54.09% at December 31, 2011.
  • The bank's continued focus on improving asset quality contributed to a sharp reduction of problem loans, with non-performing assets as a percent of total assets declining to 1.95% at December 31, 2012, compared with 3.20% at December 31, 2011, while the company's consolidated "Texas Ratio" ((NPAs + TDR):(Capital + ALLL)) improved to 25.69% at December 31, 2012, compared with 44.46% at December 31, 2011.
  • The company reduced interest expense 28% in 2012 compared with 2011, reflecting a reduction in borrowings, and net interest margin improved to 4.03% at December 31, 2012, compared with 3.89% at December 31, 2011.
  • Total assets at year end 2012 were $441.38 million, compared with yearend 2011 total assets of $427.44 million.
  • Return on average assets (ROAA) increased to 0.50% in 2012, compared with 0.14% in 2011, while return on average equity (ROAE) rose to 7.76% in 2012, compared with 2.25% in 2011.
  • Book value per share in fourth quarter 2012 reflected the company's focus on asset quality improvement in 2011 and first half 2012, increasing to $8.83 in fourth quarter 2012, compared with $8.02 in fourth quarter 2011.

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BOTJ), the parent company of Bank of the James, a full-service commercial and retail bank serving the greater Lynchburg MSA, today announced unaudited results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2012.

Robert R. Chapman III, President and CEO, commented: "Our 2012 earnings demonstrated the positive impact of the bank's initiative to improve asset quality while maintaining capital levels and growing our asset base. A dramatic measurement of our progress was ROAA and ROAE in fourth quarter 2012, where ROAA was 0.69% and ROAE was 10.51% while those ratios were both in negative territory in fourth quarter 2011. We believe the sharp improvement in the bank's Texas Ratio is also a good indicator of the bank's greatly improved financial condition.

"We are seeing overall stability in our loan portfolio, with fewer non-accruing loans, and a much lower percentage of non-accrual loans to total loans. Throughout the year, loans more than 29 days past due were close to or below 1% of total loans. We have reduced other real estate owned (OREO) and continue to aggressively pursue opportunities to sell these assets. The real estate market has brightened considerably, which we anticipate will support continuing reduction of OREO.

"In 2013, with the bulk of our work to improve our balance sheet and asset quality behind us, we can focus the majority of our attention on the business of growing Bank of the James. We have strategic locations throughout Lynchburg and Region 2000, and opportunities to grow market share. In the past year, we added to and strengthened our commercial lending team. We have grown our commercial loan portfolio and expanded banking relationships with customers to include more deposits and treasury management. In addition, we hope to expand into retirement planning services, including 401(k) plans.

"We're very enthusiastic about the coming year, with the bank positioned to move forward and economic conditions looking somewhat brighter than during the past few years."

Financial Highlights and Overview

For the year ended December 31, 2012, net interest income after provision for loan losses was $13.45 million, compared with net income after provision for loan losses of $10.52 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Interest income was $18.75 million in 2012 compared with $19.52 million in 2011, partially reflecting a slight reduction in the yield on our earning assets. The bank lowered interest expense by 28% to $3.02 million, compared with $4.19 million in 2011. During the year, the bank reduced Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings and reduced its interest expense accordingly. The bank also grew its base of lower-cost core deposits, including non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts generated by commercial customers. These factors contributed to an improvement in net interest margin to 4.03% in 2012, compared with 3.89% in 2011.

A sharp decline in the bank's provision for loan losses was a primary contributor to year-over-year earnings growth, with a loss provision of $2.29 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, down 52% compared with $4.81 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

In the fourth quarter 2012, net interest income after provision for loan losses was $3.50 million compared with net interest income after loan loss provision of $1.92 million in fourth quarter 2011. Interest income was $4.66 million compared with $4.85 million in fourth quarter 2011, while the bank reduced interest expense in fourth quarter 2012 by 26% to $651,000, compared with $877,000 in fourth quarter 2011. The company's provision for loan losses was $513,000 in fourth quarter 2012, compared with $2.05 million in fourth quarter 2011. Its net interest margin was 4.10% which, as in the full year results, primarily reflected reduced FHLB borrowings, interest rate management and increased non-interest bearing core deposits.

"We continue to offer competitive deposit and loan rates, but a key to retaining customers and maintaining margins in this exceptionally low interest rate environment is by offering outstanding community banking service and support," said J. Todd Scruggs, CFO. "This has also been true in our commercial banking business, where we have added loan customers who have moved deposits to the bank. We offer more modest account-related fees than many competitors and aren't loading up fees for customers who maintain lower balances. This has an impact on non-interest income, but it helps us win and retain core deposits and broader customer relationships."

Non-interest income, which includes fees from mortgage origination, gain on sale of securities, fees on services such as brokerage and insurance services, for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $3.62 million, compared with $3.68 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Non-interest expense in 2012 was $14.39 million compared with $13.69 million in 2011, the increase partially reflecting growth in the commercial lending team and employee bonuses granted in lieu of salary increases.

Non-interest income in fourth quarter 2012 was $1.05 million and was also $1.05 million in fourth quarter 2011. Non-interest expense was $3.52 million in fourth quarter 2012, compared with $3.37 million in fourth quarter 2011.

The bank's efficiency ratio was 73.08% in 2012 and 69.53% in fourth quarter 2012. Chapman explained the company's efficiency was impacted by costs related to problem assets, managing and selling bank-owned assets, and write-downs. Other real estate owned (OREO) declined to $2.11 million at December 31, 2012, compared with $3.25 million at December 31, 2011.

"With fewer problem assets, and as we continue to sell OREO properties, we anticipate lowering our efficiency ratio in 2013. We have also made improvements and technological upgrades to drive more efficient operations, which should have a positive impact on operational costs."

Total loans, net of allowance for loan loss and including loans held for sale, were $320.83 million at December 31, 2012 compared with $319.19 million at December 31, 2011, reflecting modest growth offset by removing non-performing loans from the portfolio in 2012. Chapman said mortgage lending was particularly strong in the last several months of 2012 and that its mortgage division had record earnings in 2012. "The regional real estate market is picking up, and the low interest rate environment continues to drive residential mortgage refinancing," Chapman explained. "We also experienced growth in commercial lending, which will contribute to anticipated loan portfolio growth in 2013."

Total deposits at December 31, 2012 increased 6.6% to $399.02 million, compared with $374.23 million at December 31, 2011, primarily reflecting strong deposit retention and more than 800 new demand deposit accounts opened during the year.

The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans declined to 1.95% at December 31, 2012, compared with 3.20% at December 31, 2011. The company's allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.70% at December 31, 2012, compared with 1.73% at December 31, 2011. Coverage for losses increased significantly, with an allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans of 87.22% at December 31, 2012, compared with 54.09% at December 31, 2011. Loan charge-offs in 2012 decreased 45% to $2.60 million, compared with $4.72 million in 2011. OREO at December 31, 2012 was $2.11 million compared with $3.25 million at December 31, 2011.

Total assets increased to $441.38 million at December 31, 2012, compared with $427.44 million at December 31, 2011. The bank remained well capitalized by accepted regulatory standards with a tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.41%, tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 11.16%, and total risk-based capital of 12.42%.

Chapman concluded: "We greatly appreciate our shareholders' support and confidence during a few challenging years, and we are delighted to have demonstrated increased shareholder value and greater capital strength in 2012. We also thank our employees for their diligent work to serve our customers and help increase the bank's productivity, for the sacrifices they made to help us manage expenses, and for their active and generous participation in charitable and civic activities that have played a major role in building good will and visibility for Bank of the James in the community."

About the Company

Bank of the James, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc., serves the greater Lynchburg, Virginia MSA, often referred to as Region 2000, which was ranked by Forbes magazine among the top 50 places in the United States for business and careers. The bank operates nine full service locations and one limited service location as well as a mortgage origination office in Forest, Virginia and an investment services division in downtown Lynchburg. The company will celebrate its 14th anniversary this year. Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. common stock is listed under the symbol "BOTJ" on the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "plan" and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Bank of the James Financial Group (the "Company") undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to competition, general economic conditions, potential changes in interest rates, and changes in the value of real estate securing loans made by Bank of the James (the "Bank"), a subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and previously filed by the Bank (as predecessor of the Company) with the Federal Reserve Board.

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(000's) except ratios and percent data
Unaudited

               Three      Three                 Year       Year
              months     months                  to         to
              ending     ending                 date       date
Selected      Dec 31,    Dec 31,               Dec 31,    Dec 31,
 Data:         2012       2011      Change      2012       2011     Change
            ---------- ----------  --------  ---------- ---------- --------
Interest
 income     $    4,659 $    4,845     -3.84% $   18,753 $   19,519    -3.92%
Interest
 expense           651        877    -25.77%      3,016      4,192   -28.05%
Net
 interest
 income          4,008      3,968      1.01%     15,737     15,327     2.68%
Provision
 for loan
 losses            513      2,050    -74.98%      2,289      4,807   -52.38%
Noninterest
 income          1,052      1,050      0.19%      3,618      3,680    -1.68%
Noninterest
 expense         3,518      3,366      4.52%     14,144     13,446     5.19%
Amortization
 of tax
 credit
 investment        247        247      0.00%        247        247     0.00%
Income
 taxes              35       (427)  -108.20%        543        (93) -683.87%
Net income         747       (218)  -442.66%      2,132        600   255.33%
Weighted
 average
 shares
 outstanding 3,345,573  3,328,394      0.52%  3,343,210  3,324,915     0.55%
Basic net
 income per
 share      $     0.22 $    (0.07) $   0.29  $     0.64 $     0.18 $   0.46
Fully
 diluted
 net income
 per share  $     0.22 $    (0.07) $   0.29  $     0.64 $     0.18 $   0.46

Balance Sheet
 at period       Dec 31,    Dec 31,             Dec 31,    Dec 31,
 end:             2012       2011     Change     2011       2010     Change
               ---------- ---------- -------  ---------- ---------- -------
Loans, net     $  319,922 $   18,754    0.37% $  318,754 $  320,715   -0.61%
Loans held for
 sale                 904        434  108.29%        434          -     N/A
Total
 securities        53,369     56,471   -5.49%     56,471     52,883    6.78%
Total deposits    399,015    374,234    6.62%    374,234    368,390    1.59%
Stockholders'
 equity            29,613     26,805   10.48%     26,805     25,495    5.14%
Total assets      441,381    427,436    3.26%    427,436    418,928    2.03%
Shares
 outstanding    3,352,725  3,342,415  10,310   3,342,415  3,323,743  18,672
Book value per
 share         $     8.83 $     8.02 $  0.81  $     8.02 $     7.67 $  0.35



                     Three     Three              Year      Year
                    months    months               to        to
                    ending    ending              date      date
                    Dec 31,   Dec 31,            Dec 31,   Dec 31,
Daily averages:      2012      2011     Change    2012      2011     Change
                   --------  --------  -------  --------  --------  -------
Loans, net         $319,714  $316,319     1.07% $317,198  $318,878    -0.53%
Loans held for
 sale                 1,109       947    17.11%    1,109       409   171.15%
Total securities     51,231    59,213   -13.48%   57,353    58,516    -1.99%
Total deposits      390,340   373,834     4.42%  384,802   375,138     2.58%
Stockholders'
 equity              28,189    26,947     4.61%   27,474    26,657     3.06%
Interest earning
 assets             390,849   391,588    -0.19%  392,855   394,374    -0.39%
Interest bearing
 liabilities        336,040   345,023    -2.60%  341,846   349,747    -2.26%
Total assets        430,578   427,373     0.75%  429,897   427,513     0.56%



                     Three     Three               Year      Year
                     months    months               to        to
                     ending    ending              date      date
                    Dec 31,   Dec 31,            Dec 31,   Dec 31,
Financial Ratios:     2012      2011     Change    2012      2011     Change
                   --------  --------  -------- --------  --------  --------
Return on average
 assets                0.69%    -0.20%     0.89     0.50%     0.14%     0.36
Return on average
 equity               10.51%    -3.21%    13.72     7.76%     2.25%     5.51
Net interest
 margin                4.10%     4.03%     0.07     4.03%     3.89%     0.14
Efficiency ratio      69.53%    67.08%     2.45    73.08%    70.74%     2.34
Average equity to
 average assets        6.55%     6.31%     0.24     6.39%     6.24%     0.16



                     Three     Three              Year      Year
                    months    months               to        to
                    ending    ending              date      date
Allowance for loan  Dec 31,   Dec 31,            Dec 31,   Dec 31,
 losses:             2012      2011     Change    2012      2011     Change
                   --------  --------  -------  --------  --------  -------
Beginning balance  $  5,693  $  5,461     4.25% $  5,612  $  5,467     2.65%
Provision for
 losses                 513     2,050   -74.98%    2,289     4,807   -52.38%
Charge-offs            (749)   (1,920)  -60.99%   (2,599)   (4,716)  -44.89%
Recoveries               78        21   271.43%      233        54   331.48%
Ending balance        5,535     5,612    -1.37%    5,535     5,612    -1.37%



Nonperforming       Dec 31,   Dec 31,            Dec 31,   Dec 31,
 assets:             2012      2011     Change    2011      2010     Change
                   --------  --------  -------  --------  --------  -------
Total
 nonperforming
 loans             $  6,346  $ 10,376   -38.84% $ 10,376  $  8,366    24.03%
Other real estate
 owned                2,112     3,253   -35.08%    3,253     3,440    -5.44%
Total
 nonperforming
 assets               8,458    13,629   -37.94%   13,629    11,806    15.44%
Troubled debt
 restructurings -
 (performing
 portion)               572       783   -26.95%      783     4,987   -84.30%



Asset quality       Dec 31,   Dec 31,            Dec 31,   Dec 31,
 ratios:              2012      2011    Change     2011      2010    Change
                   --------  --------  -------  --------  --------  -------
Nonperforming
 loans to total
 loans                 1.95%     3.20%   (1.25)     3.20%     2.56%    0.63
Allowance for loan
 losses to total
 loans                 1.70%     1.73%   (0.03)     1.73%     1.68%    0.05
Allowance for loan
 losses to
 nonperforming
 loans                87.22%    54.09%   33.13     54.09%    65.35%  (11.26)

Add to Digg Bookmark with del.icio.us Add to Newsvine

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
There's Big Data, then there's really Big Data from the Internet of Things. IoT is evolving to include many data possibilities like new types of event, log and network data. The volumes are enormous, generating tens of billions of logs per day, which raise data challenges. Early IoT deployments are relying heavily on both the cloud and managed service providers to navigate these challenges. In her session at Big Data Expo®, Hannah Smalltree, Director at Treasure Data, discussed how IoT, Big Data and deployments are processing massive data volumes from wearables, utilities and other machines...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Gridstore™, the leader in hyper-converged infrastructure purpose-built to optimize Microsoft workloads, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Gridstore™ is the leader in hyper-converged infrastructure purpose-built for Microsoft workloads and designed to accelerate applications in virtualized environments. Gridstore’s hyper-converged infrastructure is the industry’s first all flash version of HyperConverged Appliances that include both compute and storag...
The Internet of Things promises to transform businesses (and lives), but navigating the business and technical path to success can be difficult to understand. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sean Lorenz, Technical Product Manager for Xively at LogMeIn, demonstrated how to approach creating broadly successful connected customer solutions using real world business transformation studies including New England BioLabs and more.
WebRTC defines no default signaling protocol, causing fragmentation between WebRTC silos. SIP and XMPP provide possibilities, but come with considerable complexity and are not designed for use in a web environment. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Matthew Hodgson, technical co-founder of the Matrix.org, discussed how Matrix is a new non-profit Open Source Project that defines both a new HTTP-based standard for VoIP & IM signaling and provides reference implementations.
DevOps Summit 2015 New York, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that it is now accepting Keynote Proposals. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long development cycles that produce software that is obsolete at launch. DevOps may be disruptive, but it is essential.
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
The 3rd International @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that it is now accepting Keynote Proposals. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound change in personal and enterprise IT since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago. All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades.
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.