Welcome!

.NET Authors: Lori MacVittie, Yeshim Deniz, Ivan Antsipau, Liz McMillan, Michael Bushong

News Feed Item

Greenhill & Co. Reports Fourth Quarter Earnings Per Share Of $0.50 And Annual Earnings Per Share Of $1.38

NEW YORK, Jan. 23, 2013  /PRNewswire/ --

  • Quarterly advisory revenues highest since 2007 and third largest in Firm's history, up 17%  from prior year fourth quarter
  • Annual advisory revenues down 4% from prior year while worldwide overall volume of M&A completions declined 14%(1)
  • Total revenues, as well as cost ratios and profit margins, negatively impacted in the fourth quarter by an investment loss of $8.1 million as compared to a gain of $9.0 million in fourth quarter of prior year
  • Compensation ratio for the fourth quarter and the full year at 53% of total revenues, similar to last year despite slightly lower total revenues
  • Pre-tax profit margin of 31% for the fourth quarter and 25% for the full year
  • Accelerated liquidation of investments with sale of entire interest in Greenhill Capital Partners Europe, L.P. for $27.2 million, resulting in a loss of $3.4 million
  • Loss on European investments non-deductible for tax purposes, which together with heavy concentration of advisory revenues in the U.S. resulted in higher than typical effective tax rates of 46% for the quarter and 40% for the year
  • Repurchased 855,608 shares of our common stock during the fourth quarter through open market transactions; for the full year 2012, repurchased 1,896,434 shares of our common stock and common stock equivalents at an average price of $43.85 per share
  • Share count increased by 659,926 (prior to repurchases) in fourth quarter as a result of early achievement of 3-year revenue target by our Australian entity acquired in 2010
  • Board authorized up to $100 million of share repurchases in 2013

(1) Global M&A completed transaction volume for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Source: Thomson Financial as of January 21, 2013.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL) today reported revenues of $285.1 million, income before tax of $70.5 million and net income allocated to common stockholders of $42.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Diluted earnings per share were $1.38 for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

The Firm's 2012 revenues compare with revenues of $294.0 million for 2011, which represents a decrease of $8.9 million, or 3%.  Advisory revenues for 2012 were $291.5 million, compared with $302.8 million for 2011, representing a decrease of $11.3 million, or 4%.

The Firm's 2012 income before tax of $70.5 million compares to income before tax of $68.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, representing an increase of $1.8 million, or 3%.  Net income allocated to common stockholders of $42.1 million and diluted earnings per share of $1.38 for 2012, compare with net income allocated to common stockholders of $44.6 million and diluted earnings per share of $1.44 for 2011, representing decreases of $2.5 million, or 6%, and $0.06 per share, or 4%, respectively.  Our 2012 net income was impacted by an increase in our effective tax rate from 35% in 2011 to 40% in 2012 due in part to the one-time effect of non-deductible capital losses recognized on the sale of our European investments. 

The Firm's fourth quarter revenues were $92.3 million, which compares to revenues of $94.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2011, representing a decrease of $2.2 million, or 2%.  Advisory revenues for the fourth quarter of 2012 were $100.4 million, which  compares to $85.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2011, representing an increase of $14.9 million, or 17%. 

The Firm's fourth quarter income before tax was $28.2 million, which compares to income before tax of $25.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, representing an increase of $3.1 million, or 12%.  Net income allocated to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $15.1 million, which compares to net income allocated to common stockholders of $16.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, representing a decrease of $1.0 million, or 6%. Diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2012 were $0.50, which compares with $0.53 for the fourth quarter of 2011, representing a decrease of $0.03 per share, or 6%. As mentioned above, our net income allocated to common stockholders was negatively impacted by the fourth quarter non-deductible loss recognized on the sale of our European investments.

The Firm's revenues, income before tax and net income can fluctuate materially depending on the number and size of completed transactions on which it advised, the size of investment gains (or losses), and other factors.  Accordingly, the revenues and net income in any particular period may not be indicative of future results.

"Despite continued challenging market conditions, 2012 was a year of strong performance relative to our four primary objectives: increasing market share, achieving the highest pretax profit margin among our closest peers, maintaining a strong dividend and maintaining a flat or declining share count. Our advisory revenue for the year was down only 4% despite global completed transaction activity declining by 14%, and based on advisory revenue reported by our large bank competitors to date it appears that we again increased our market share of the fee pool in 2012. By keeping non-compensation costs flat and maintaining a compensation ratio consistent with last year despite slightly lower total revenue, we achieved a pre-tax profit margin of 25%. And we not only continued our strong dividend policy but repurchased nearly 1.9 million shares during the year while maintaining a balance sheet with no net debt. The scale of our repurchases in the fourth quarter was facilitated by the sale of Greenhill Capital Partners Europe, L.P., the largest private fund interest remaining from our exit from the investing business some years ago. While the sale resulted in a small investment loss and caused us to incur an unusually high tax rate, we believed it was attractive to shareholders because it accelerated the liquidation of our investments and facilitated greater share repurchases at prices we found attractive," Robert F. Greenhill, Chairman, said.

"In the fourth quarter the general market for transaction activity finally saw a meaningful improvement, resulting in the most active quarter for global mergers and acquisitions in several years. We had signaled six months ago that we were seeing a significant increase in transaction activity within our Firm, and since then we have seen a much improved flow of important transaction announcements, resulting in the fourth quarter being our best for advisory revenue since 2007.  While our business continues to have three strong regional pillars in North America, Europe and Australia, most of our recent success relates to the U.S. market, where conditions seem to have improved the most. As and when market activity in the other regions picks up, we should see further significant improvement in our results, which in turn would allow us to bring down our compensation ratio and increase our profit margin. We are also pleased with the expanding breadth of advisory services we can offer clients, demonstrated by the fact that, alongside continuing success in M&A transactions, an increased share of our revenues came from advising on financings, restructurings and other matters. For the near term, it is clear that we began the new year with a far more attractive backlog of announced and pending transactions than we had a year ago, and that is the basis for our Board authorizing $100 million of share repurchases for 2013. For the medium to longer term, we feel even more confident that we will benefit as both clients and talented advisors turn away from the large banks with their many conflicts and challenges toward independent advisory firms. Within that group, Greenhill stands out as the only one solely focused on the client advisory business, with teams of senior bankers in each of the primary transaction markets globally and with the capability to offer advisory expertise on a wide range of matters to corporations, institutions and governments," Scott L. Bok, Chief Executive Officer, commented.


Revenues

Revenues by Source

The following provides a breakdown of total revenues by source for the three month periods and years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:


For the Three Months Ended



December 31, 2012



December 31, 2011



Amount


% of Total


Amount


% of Total


(in millions, unaudited)


Advisory revenues

$

100.4



109

%


$

85.5



91

%

Investment revenues

(8.1)



(9)

%


9.0



9

%

Total revenues

$

92.3



100

%


$

94.5



100

%

 


For the Year Ended



December 31, 2012



December 31, 2011



Amount


% of Total


Amount


% of Total


(in millions, unaudited)


Advisory revenues

$

291.5



102

%


$

302.8



103

%

Investment revenues

(6.4)



(2)

%


(8.8)



(3)

%

Total revenues

$

285.1



100

%


$

294.0



100

%

Advisory Revenues

Full Year

For year ended December 31, 2012, advisory revenues were $291.5 million compared to $302.8 million in 2011, a decrease of 4%.  At the same time, worldwide completed M&A volume decreased 14%, from $2,424 billion in 2011 to $2,077 billion in 2012(1).

The decrease in our 2012 advisory revenues, as compared to 2011, resulted from a slight change in the mix of our advisory assignments and resulting transactions, with fewer $1 million or greater revenue clients nearly offset by having more $10 million or greater revenue clients.  By region, a decline in Australian revenues and revenues outside our primary markets was offset by an increase in North American revenue, driven by changes in general transaction activity in those markets.  By industry sector, improved performance in the industrial, technology and energy sectors generally offset a sharp decline in activity in the financial services sector.

We earned advisory revenues from 160 different clients in both 2012 and 2011.  We earned $1 million or more from 66 clients in 2012, down 11% compared to 74 in 2011, and 32% of those were new to the Firm in 2012.  The ten largest fee-paying clients contributed 36% and 35% to our total revenues in 2012 and 2011, respectively, and none of our ten largest fee-paying clients in 2012 had in any prior year been among our ten largest fee-paying clients. We did not have any clients in 2012 or 2011 who represented 10% or more of our revenues.

Historical Financial Advisory Revenues by Client Location


For the Year Ended December 31,



2012



2011



2010



2009



2008


North America

60

%


48

%


57

%


65

%


53

%

Europe

22

%


22

%


20

%


34

%


44

%

Australia

14

%


22

%


15

%





Asia, Latin America & Other

4

%


8

%


8

%


1

%


3

%

Historical Financial Advisory Revenues by Industry


For the Year Ended December 31,



2012



2011



2010



2009



2008


Communications & Media

7

%


7

%


7

%


1

%


11

%

Consumer Goods & Retail

8

%


13

%


6

%


8

%


7

%

Energy & Utilities

11

%


8

%


14

%


8

%


13

%

Financial Services

7

%


22

%


17

%


19

%


18

%

Healthcare

9

%


12

%


7

%


16

%


8

%

Real Estate, Lodging & Leisure

5

%


6

%


6

%


2

%


8

%

Technology

13

%


2

%


4

%


10

%


1

%

General Industrial & Other

31

%


21

%


38

%


34

%


34

%

Fund Placement

9

%


9

%


1

%


2

%



Fourth Quarter

Advisory revenues were $100.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to $85.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, an increase of 17%.  The increase in advisory revenue in the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011 resulted primarily from an increase in the fees earned from completed assignments and to a lesser extent from an increase in retainer fees from strategic advisory assignments. 

Completed assignments in the fourth quarter of 2012 included:

  • advised Alesco Corporation Limited on its response to the takeover offer from DuluxGroup Limited;
  • the sale by the Australian Rugby League Commission of its Australian media rights, including the sale of Free-to-Air Television rights to Nine Network, Pay TV rights to Fox Sports and Digital rights and Premiership naming rights to Telstra;
  • the sale by Norwest Equity Partners of its portfolio company, Becker Underwood, to BASF AG;
  • the acquisition by Boyd Gaming Corporation of Peninsula Gaming, LLC;
  • the sale by CHAMP Ventures of its portfolio company Australian Portable Buildings, to a consortium comprising Black Diamond Group Limited and WEQ Britco LP;
  • the acquisition by Cypress Semiconductor Corporation of Ramtron International Corporation;
  • the sale of Deltek, Inc. to Thoma Bravo, LLC;
  • the sale by Goodman Fielder Limited of its Australian and New Zealand edible fats and oils business to GrainCorp;
  • the sale by The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. of its Retirement Plans Group to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company;
  • the representation of Lonmin plc on the refinancing of its balance sheet and associated rights offering;
  • the representation of Mediclinic International Limited on the restructuring of its  balance sheet;
  • the sale of Phaidon Press Limited to the Leon D. Black family;
  • the acquisition by RedPrairie of JDA Software Group, Inc.;
  • the sale of Todd Corporation Limited's stake in SKY Network Television Limited; and
  • the sale by the United States Department of the Treasury of its common stock ownership stake in American International Group.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, our Capital Advisory Group served as global placement agent on behalf of private equity and real estate funds for four interim closings and one final closing of the sale of limited partnership interests in such funds.   We also advised on a secondary market sale of limited partnership interests.

Management and Personnel Changes

In January 2013, as part of the annual evaluation and promotion process, the Firm named three new Managing Directors: Michael Cramer (Frankfurt), Lee Purcell (New York) and Anthony Samengo-Turner (Frankfurt).  Mr. Cramer and Mr. Samengo-Turner are part of our European Corporate Advisory Group.  Mr. Purcell is a member of our Real Estate Capital Advisory Group.

The Firm also recently announced the addition of Steve Cruise (most recently with UBS, where he was Co-Head of the Chicago office and Midwest Region) as a Managing Director.  Mr. Cruise will expand our coverage of the industrial sector in North America and will join the team in our Chicago office focused on industrial companies.

Effective January 1, 2013, longtime Managing Director Ken Crews elected to transition to a Senior Advisor  role at the Firm, continuing to focus on the utilities space in his new role.  In conjunction with Mr. Crews' transition to Senior Advisor we will close our Dallas office, where he was the sole Managing Director. 

The Firm also announced today certain management changes in Australia designed to position the Firm for continued global growth and further develop its next generation of leadership.  Following many years of successfully running the Australian business and overseeing the integration, Ron Malek and Simon Mordant have each been appointed Vice Chairman of the Firm globally and will remain Managing Directors.  In this new role they each will focus entirely on advising clients not only domestically in Australia, but in cross border transactions and selectively in other markets.  They each have already been helpful with clients in the U.S., South Africa and elsewhere, and these new appointments both recognize that contribution and seek to build on it as we continue to develop the Firm's business globally.  With Mr. Malek and Mr. Mordant moving to Vice Chairman and Managing Director roles, the management of Greenhill Australia is now assumed by Roger Feletto and Jamie Garis, both of whom joined the Firm as part of the Australian acquisition, who each take on the titles of Co-Head of Greenhill Australia. 

Investment Revenues

Since we exited from the merchant banking business in 2010, we have sought to realize value from our remaining principal investments, which principally consisted of investments in Iridium Communications Inc. (NASDAQ - IRDM) and previously sponsored merchant banking funds.

In October 2011, we initiated a 10b5-1 sales plan to sell our entire interest in Iridium over a period of more than two years. During 2012, we sold 3,850,000 shares ofh Iridium at an average price of $7.91 per share for proceeds of $30.5 million, including the sale of 855,000 shares in the fourth quarter at an average price of $6.49 per share for proceeds of $5.5 million.  In the fourth quarter of 2011, which was the first period we sold our stake in Iridium, we sold 870,000 shares of Iridium at an average price of $6.72 per share for proceeds of $5.8 million

We began the liquidation of our investments in previously sponsored merchant banking funds in 2011 when we sold for book value substantially all of our interests in two U.S. domiciled funds that we sponsored prior to our exit from the merchant banking business (Greenhill Capital Partners L.P. II ("GCP II") and GSAV L.P.) for $49.4 million.  As part of that sale, the purchasers had the right, which was exercisable in December 2012, to require us to repurchase their interests in either or both of two of the GCP II portfolio companies sold to them at their purchase price, adjusted for further capital calls or distributions since the date of sale.  The purchasers exercised their put rights and we acquired interests in two portfolio companies of GCP II for $15.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. 

In December 2012, we continued the liquidation of our previously sponsored merchant banking funds with the sale of our entire interest in Greenhill Capital Partners Europe L.P. for proceeds of $27.2 million, which represented approximately 90% of book value.  This transaction was pursued in order to accelerate the liquidation of our investment portfolio and generate additional funds for share repurchases.

At December 31, 2012, our remaining investments consisted principally of our investment in Iridium, which had a value of $34.2 million, and our remaining investments in previously sponsored and other merchant banking funds of $16.9 million.  Following the transactions described above, our remaining financial commitments relating to our historic merchant banking funds are reduced to $3.2 million.

The following table sets forth additional information relating to our investment revenues for the three month periods and years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:


Three months ended
December 31,


For the Year Ended
December 31,


2012


2011


2012


2011


(in millions, unaudited)

Net realized and unrealized gains on investments in merchant banking funds

$

(4.8)



$

(5.4)



$

(3.4)



$

(4.5)


Deferred gain on sale of certain merchant banking assets

0.1



0.2



0.3



0.8


Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) in Iridium

(3.8)



13.9



(5.0)



(6.2)


Interest income

0.4



0.3



1.7



1.1


Total investment revenues

$

(8.1)



$

9.0



$

(6.4)



$

(8.8)


Full Year

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Firm recorded investment revenues of negative $6.4 million  compared to investment revenues of negative $8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.  The investment losses in each year relate to comparable declines in both 2012 and 2011 in the quoted market price of Iridium and the estimated fair market value of our previously sponsored merchant banking funds.

Fourth Quarter

For the fourth quarter of 2012, the Firm recorded investment revenues of negative $8.1 million compared to a gain of $9.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.  During the fourth quarter of 2012, the quoted market value of our investment in Iridium declined, resulting in an investment loss of $3.8 million as compared to an increase in the quoted market value  of $13.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. 

Also, during the fourth quarter of 2012, the Firm recorded a loss of $4.8 million on its investment in merchant banking funds, including a realized loss of $3.4 million on the sale of Greenhill Capital Partners Europe L.P., as compared to a decline of $5.4 million in the fair value of the merchant banking funds in the same period of the prior year.  Due to limitations on the deductibility of capital losses in the U.K., the loss recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 on the sale of the European investments is non-deductible for tax purposes and increased our 2012 provision for taxes.

The investment gains (or losses) from our investment in Iridium and our investments in our historic merchant banking funds may fluctuate significantly over time due to factors beyond our control, such as performance of each company in our merchant banking portfolio, equity market valuations, and merger and acquisition opportunities.  Revenues recognized from gains (or losses) recorded in any particular period are not necessarily indicative of revenues that may be realized and/or recognized in future periods.


Expenses

Operating Expenses

Full Year

For the year ended December 31, 2012, total operating expenses were $214.6 million compared to $225.3 million of total operating expenses in 2011. The decrease of $10.7 million, or 5%, related to a decrease in our compensation expense, as described in more detail below.  Our pre-tax income margin for 2012 was 25% as compared to 23% for 2011.

Fourth Quarter

Our total operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2012 were $64.2 million compared to $69.4 million of total operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2011.  This represents a decrease in total operating expenses of $5.3 million, or 8%, which resulted  from a decrease in compensation expense as described in more detail below.  Our pre-tax margin was 31% for the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to 27% for the fourth quarter of 2011.

The following table sets forth information relating to our operating expenses for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, which are reported net of reimbursements of certain expenses by our clients:


For the Three Months Ended December 31,


For the Year Ended  
December 31,


2012


2011


2012


2011


(in millions, unaudited)

Employee compensation and benefits expense

$

48.9



$

54.2



$

151.8



$

162.6


% of revenues  

53

%


57

%


53

%


55

%

Non-compensation expense

15.3



15.3



62.8



62.7


% of revenues  

17

%


16

%


22

%


21

%

Total operating expense

64.2



69.4



214.6



225.3


% of revenues  

69

%


73

%


75

%


77

%

Total income before tax

28.2



25.1



70.5



68.7


Pre-tax profit margin

31

%


27

%


25

%


23

%

Compensation and Benefits Expenses

Full Year

For the year ended December 31, 2012, our employee compensation and benefits expenses were $151.8 million compared to $162.6 million for the same period in the prior year.  Our 2011 compensation and benefits expenses included a fourth quarter charge of $7.0 million for the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards previously granted to employees who died in an airplane accident.  Excluding that charge, our 2012 compensation and benefits expenses decreased $3.8 million, or 2%, from 2011.  Consistent with our philosophy to measure compensation as a percentage of revenues, the decrease in compensation and benefits expenses in 2012 results from slightly lower revenues in 2012 as compared to 2011.  The ratio of compensation expense to revenues in 2012 was 53% as compared to 55% (53% excluding the accelerated charge) in 2011. 

Fourth Quarter

Our employee compensation and benefits expenses in the fourth quarter of 2012 were $48.9 million, which reflected a 53% ratio of compensation to revenues.  This amount compared to $54.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2011, which reflected a 57% ratio of compensation to revenues.  Excluding the accelerated compensation charge last year of $7.0 million, compensation and benefits expenses increased $1.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. 

Our compensation expense is generally based upon revenue and can fluctuate materially in any particular period depending upon the changes in headcount, amount of revenues recognized, as well as other factors.  Accordingly, the amount of compensation expense recognized in any particular period may not be indicative of compensation expense in a future period.

Non-Compensation Expenses

Full Year

For the year ended December 31, 2012, our non-compensation expenses of $62.8 million remained consistent with our non-compensation expenses of $62.7 million in 2011.  In 2012, as compared to 2011, an increase in travel expenses and other operating costs were offset by lower amortization of the Australian intangible assets and a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in average borrowings outstanding and a slight decrease in borrowing costs.  

Non-compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues for 2012 were 22% compared to 21% for 2011. The slight increase in non-compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues resulted from comparable costs for both years spread over slightly lower revenues in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Fourth Quarter

Our non-compensation expenses were $15.3 million in the fourth quarters of both 2012 and 2011.  In the fourth quarter of 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011, lower amortization of Australian intangible assets and lower borrowing costs were offset by higher travel costs.

Non-compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were 17% and 16%, respectively.  The slight increase in non-compensation expense as a percentage of revenues resulted from comparable costs for both periods spread over slightly lower revenues in the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.

The Firm's non-compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues can vary as a result of a variety of factors including fluctuation in revenue amounts, changes in headcount, the amount of recruiting and business development activity, the amount of office expansion, the amount of reimbursement of engagement-related expenses by clients, the amount of short-term borrowings, interest rate and currency movements and other factors.  Accordingly, the non-compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues in any particular period may not be indicative of the non-compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues in future periods.

Provision for Income Taxes

Full Year

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the provision for taxes was $28.4 million, which reflected an effective tax rate of 40%.  This compared to a provision for taxes for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $24.1 million, which reflected an effective tax rate of 35%.  The increase in the provision for income taxes and effective tax rate in the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to 2011, resulted from both a greater proportion of earnings being generated in the U.S. and the impact of capital losses not currently deductible related to our European investments.  Since the U.S. imposes a higher federal and state tax rate than the other jurisdictions in which we operate, an increase in the portion of our pre-tax earnings allocated to the U.S. in 2012 as compared to 2011 increased our tax provision and effective tax rate.  Further, as a result of the liquidation of our investment portfolio in Europe at a loss, we recorded capital losses not currently deductible, which have the one-time effect of increasing our tax provision and effective tax rate. 

Fourth Quarter

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the provision for income taxes was $13.0 million, which reflected an effective rate of 46%.  This compared to an income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2011 of $8.9 million, which reflected an effective tax rate of 36%.  The increase in the provision for income taxes in the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011 resulted from a higher effective tax rate applied in 2012 to higher 2012 pre-tax earnings.  The increase in the effective rate in the fourth quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011 resulted principally from the impact of capital losses not currently deductible. 

The effective tax rate can fluctuate as a result of variations in the relative amounts of advisory and investment income earned and the tax rate imposed in the tax jurisdictions in which the Firm operates and invests. Accordingly, the effective tax rate in any particular period may not be indicative of the effective tax rate in future periods.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2012, we had cash of $50.3 million, investments of $51.1 million and short-term debt of $29.1 million.

During the fourth quarter, the Firm repurchased 855,608 shares of its common stock in open market purchases at an average price of $49.59 per share, for a total cost of $42.4 million.

For the full year 2012, the Firm repurchased 1,714,614 shares of its common stock in open market purchases and 181,820 restricted stock units from employees at the time of vesting to settle tax liabilities, for an aggregate of 1,896,434 shares of our common stock and common stock equivalents repurchased at an average price of $43.85 per share, for a total purchase cost of $83.2 million.

The Board of Directors of Greenhill & Co. Inc. has authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of common stock during 2013.

Dividend

The Board of Directors of Greenhill & Co., Inc. has declared a dividend of $0.45 per share to be paid on March 20, 2013 to common stockholders of record on March 6, 2013.

Earnings Call

Greenhill will host a conference call beginning at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, accessible via telephone and the internet.  Scott L. Bok, Chief Executive Officer, and Christopher T. Grubb, Chief Financial Officer, will review the Firm's fourth quarter and full year 2012 financial results and related matters.   Following the review, there will be a question and answer session. 

Investors and analysts may participate in the live conference call by dialing (888) 317-6003 (toll-free domestic) or (412) 317-6061 (international); passcode: 2019051.  Please register at least 10 minutes before the conference call begins.  The conference call will also be accessible as an audio webcast through the Investor Relations section of Greenhill's website at www.greenhill.com.  There is no charge to access the call.

For those unable to listen to the live broadcast, a replay of the call will be available for one month via telephone starting approximately one hour after the call ends.  The replay can be accessed at (877) 344 - 7529 (toll-free domestic) or (412) 317 - 0088 (international); passcode: 10023621.   The webcast will be archived on Greenhill's website for 30 days after the call.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. is a leading independent investment bank focused on providing financial advice on significant mergers, acquisitions, restructurings, financings and capital raising to corporations, partnerships, institutions and governments.  It acts for clients located throughout the world from its offices in New York, London, Frankfurt, Stockholm, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Melbourne and San Francisco.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The preceding discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear below.  We have made statements in this discussion that are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may", "might", "will", "should", "expect", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "intend", "predict", "potential" or "continue", the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology.  These forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections of our future financial performance, based on our growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business.  These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events.  There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, you should consider the numerous risks outlined under ''Risk Factors'' in our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2011.  We are under no duty and we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any of these forward-looking statements after the date on which they are made, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


For the Three Months Ended December 31,


For the Year Ended      
December 31,


2012


2011


2012


2011

Revenues








Advisory revenues

$

100,385



$

85,547



$

291,545



$

302,833


Investment revenues

(8,060)



8,956



(6,466)



(8,840)


Total revenues

92,325



94,503



285,079



293,993


Expenses








Employee compensation and benefits

48,863



54,153



151,795



162,578


Occupancy and equipment rental

4,407



4,380



17,777



17,457


Depreciation and amortization

1,777



2,049



7,240



8,009


Information services

1,848



1,704



8,040



7,273


Professional fees

1,354



1,303



5,392



5,694


Travel related expenses

2,622



2,489



10,981



10,325


Interest expense

266



422



1,016



2,040


Other operating expenses

3,026



2,943



12,363



11,947


Total expenses

64,163



69,443



214,604



225,323


Income before taxes

28,162



25,060



70,475



68,670


Provision for taxes

13,035



8,950



28,383



24,086


Consolidated net income

15,127



16,110



42,092



44,584


Less: Net income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interests







6


Net income allocated to common stockholders

$

15,127



$

16,110



$

42,092



$

44,578










Average shares outstanding:








Basic

30,124,409



30,390,951



30,553,460



31,020,894


Diluted

30,147,926



30,397,575



30,561,682



31,034,817


Earnings per share:








Basic

$

0.50



$

0.53



$

1.38



$

1.44


Diluted

$

0.50



$

0.53



$

1.38



$

1.44


Dividends declared and paid per share

$

0.45



$

0.45



$

1.80



$

1.80


Contact: Christopher T. Grubb
Chief Financial Officer
Greenhill & Co., Inc.
(212) 389-1800

SOURCE Greenhill & Co., Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have spoken with, or attended presentations from, utilities in the United States, South America, Asia and Europe. This session will provide a look at the CREPE drivers for SmartGrids and the solution spaces used by SmartGrids today and planned for the near future. All organizations can learn from SmartGrid’s use of Predictive Maintenance, Demand Prediction, Cloud, Big Data and Customer-facing Dashboards...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is going to require a new way of thinking and of developing software for speed, security and innovation. This requires IT leaders to balance business as usual while anticipating for the next market and technology trends. Cloud provides the right IT asset portfolio to help today’s IT leaders manage the old and prepare for the new. Today the cloud conversation is evolving from private and public to hybrid. This session will provide use cases and insights to reinforce the value of the network in helping organizations to maximize their company’s cloud experience.
IoT is still a vague buzzword for many people. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kavis, Vice President & Principal Cloud Architect at Cloud Technology Partners, will discuss the business value of IoT that goes far beyond the general public's perception that IoT is all about wearables and home consumer services. The presentation will also discuss how IoT is perceived by investors and how venture capitalist access this space. Other topics to discuss are barriers to success, what is new, what is old, and what the future may hold.
Whether you're a startup or a 100 year old enterprise, the Internet of Things offers a variety of new capabilities for your business. IoT style solutions can help you get closer your customers, launch new product lines and take over an industry. Some companies are dipping their toes in, but many have already taken the plunge, all while dramatic new capabilities continue to emerge. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Reid Carlberg, Senior Director, Developer Evangelism at salesforce.com, to discuss real-world use cases, patterns and opportunities you can harness today.
All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices – computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors – connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo in Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be!
Noted IoT expert and researcher Joseph di Paolantonio (pictured below) has joined the @ThingsExpo faculty. Joseph, who describes himself as an “Independent Thinker” from DataArchon, will speak on the topic of “Smart Grids & Managing Big Utilities.” Over his career, Joseph di Paolantonio has worked in the energy, renewables, aerospace, telecommunications, and information technology industries. His expertise is in data analysis, system engineering, Bayesian statistics, data warehouses, business intelligence, data mining, predictive methods, and very large databases (VLDB). Prior to DataArchon, he served as a VP and Principal Analyst with Constellation Group. He is a member of the Boulder (Colo.) Brain Trust, an organization with a mission “to benefit the Business Intelligence and data management industry by providing pro bono exchange of information between vendors and independent analysts on new trends and technologies and to provide vendors with constructive feedback on their of...
Software AG helps organizations transform into Digital Enterprises, so they can differentiate from competitors and better engage customers, partners and employees. Using the Software AG Suite, companies can close the gap between business and IT to create digital systems of differentiation that drive front-line agility. We offer four on-ramps to the Digital Enterprise: alignment through collaborative process analysis; transformation through portfolio management; agility through process automation and integration; and visibility through intelligent business operations and big data.
There will be 50 billion Internet connected devices by 2020. Today, every manufacturer has a propriety protocol and an app. How do we securely integrate these "things" into our lives and businesses in a way that we can easily control and manage? Even better, how do we integrate these "things" so that they control and manage each other so our lives become more convenient or our businesses become more profitable and/or safe? We have heard that the best interface is no interface. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Co-Founder & CTO at Octoblu, Inc., will discuss how these devices generate enough data to learn our behaviors and simplify/improve our lives. What if we could connect everything to everything? I'm not only talking about connecting things to things but also systems, cloud services, and people. Add in a little machine learning and artificial intelligence and now we have something interesting...
Last week, while in San Francisco, I used the Uber app and service four times. All four experiences were great, although one of the drivers stopped for 30 seconds and then left as I was walking up to the car. He must have realized I was a blogger. None the less, the next car was just a minute away and I suffered no pain. In this article, my colleague, Ved Sen, Global Head, Advisory Services Social, Mobile and Sensors at Cognizant shares his experiences and insights.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) irreversibly encoded. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Peter Dunkley, Technical Director at Acision, will look at how this identity problem can be solved and discuss ways to use existing web identities for real-time communication.
Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. It also ensured scalability and better service for customers, including MUY! Companies, one of the country's largest franchise restaurant companies with 232 Pizza Hut locations. This is one example of WebRTC adoption today, but the potential is limitless when powered by IoT. Attendees will learn real-world benefits of WebRTC and explore future possibilities, as WebRTC and IoT intersect to improve customer service.
From telemedicine to smart cars, digital homes and industrial monitoring, the explosive growth of IoT has created exciting new business opportunities for real time calls and messaging. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Ivelin Ivanov, CEO and Co-Founder of Telestax, will share some of the new revenue sources that IoT created for Restcomm – the open source telephony platform from Telestax. Ivelin Ivanov is a technology entrepreneur who founded Mobicents, an Open Source VoIP Platform, to help create, deploy, and manage applications integrating voice, video and data. He is the co-founder of TeleStax, an Open Source Cloud Communications company that helps the shift from legacy IN/SS7 telco networks to IP-based cloud comms. An early investor in multiple start-ups, he still finds time to code for his companies and contribute to open source projects.
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to create new business models as significant as those that were inspired by the Internet and the smartphone 20 and 10 years ago. What business, social and practical implications will this phenomenon bring? That's the subject of "Monetizing the Internet of Things: Perspectives from the Front Lines," an e-book released today and available free of charge from Aria Systems, the leading innovator in recurring revenue management.
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges.
There’s Big Data, then there’s really Big Data from the Internet of Things. IoT is evolving to include many data possibilities like new types of event, log and network data. The volumes are enormous, generating tens of billions of logs per day, which raise data challenges. Early IoT deployments are relying heavily on both the cloud and managed service providers to navigate these challenges. In her session at 6th Big Data Expo®, Hannah Smalltree, Director at Treasure Data, to discuss how IoT, Big Data and deployments are processing massive data volumes from wearables, utilities and other machines.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Erik Lagerway, Co-founder of Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services to the modern P2P RTC era of OTT cloud assisted services.
While great strides have been made relative to the video aspects of remote collaboration, audio technology has basically stagnated. Typically all audio is mixed to a single monaural stream and emanates from a single point, such as a speakerphone or a speaker associated with a video monitor. This leads to confusion and lack of understanding among participants especially regarding who is actually speaking. Spatial teleconferencing introduces the concept of acoustic spatial separation between conference participants in three dimensional space. This has been shown to significantly improve comprehension and conference efficiency.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, will discuss single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example to explain some of these concepts including when to use different storage models.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Gridstore™, the leader in software-defined storage (SDS) purpose-built for Windows Servers and Hyper-V, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 15th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Gridstore™ is the leader in software-defined storage purpose built for virtualization that is designed to accelerate applications in virtualized environments. Using its patented Server-Side Virtual Controller™ Technology (SVCT) to eliminate the I/O blender effect and accelerate applications Gridstore delivers vmOptimized™ Storage that self-optimizes to each application or VM across both virtual and physical environments. Leveraging a grid architecture, Gridstore delivers the first end-to-end storage QoS to ensure the most important App or VM performance is never compromised. The storage grid, that uses Gridstore’s performance optimized nodes or capacity optimized nodes, starts with as few a...
The Transparent Cloud-computing Consortium (abbreviation: T-Cloud Consortium) will conduct research activities into changes in the computing model as a result of collaboration between "device" and "cloud" and the creation of new value and markets through organic data processing High speed and high quality networks, and dramatic improvements in computer processing capabilities, have greatly changed the nature of applications and made the storing and processing of data on the network commonplace. These technological reforms have not only changed computers and smartphones, but are also changing the data processing model for all information devices. In particular, in the area known as M2M (Machine-To-Machine), there are great expectations that information with a new type of value can be produced using a variety of devices and sensors saving/sharing data via the network and through large-scale cloud-type data processing. This consortium believes that attaching a huge number of devic...