Welcome!

.NET Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Trevor Parsons, Peter Silva

News Feed Item

Forbes Coal Reports Third Quarter Results

TORONTO, ONTARIO -- (Marketwire) -- 01/14/13 -- Forbes & Manhattan Coal Corp. (TSX:FMC)(JSE:FMC) reports its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 (three month period ended November 30, 2012). All figures are in Canadian dollars unless specified.

Third Quarter 2013 Financial Results:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Third Quarter 2013      Second Quarter 2013
                                  (Sept - Nov 2012)     (June - August 2012)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue                              $10.83 million           $23.39 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross profit                         -$2.29 million            $2.35 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated EBITDA (see                                                    
 non-IFRS measures)                  -$3.39 million            $2.72 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forbes Coal Dundee Stand                                                    
 Alone EBITDA (see non-IFRS                                                 
 measures)                           -$1.43 million            $3.34 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents             $3.73 million            $14.6 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Third quarter results reflect the four and a half week labour disruption this past November in addition to the challenging international coal market. The company has resumed operating at full production and taking into consideration the seasonal December closure, we are pleased to see the quick ramp up and momentum we have achieved in the weeks since. At a high level, our year to date run of mine tonnes has surpassed the same period in FY2012. Our continued commitment to achieving growth is our priority", commented Stephan Theron, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Operational Overview

During the third quarter the mining industry in South Africa experienced tense labour relations issues. Labour disruptions at the Forbes Coal Dundee properties lasted four and a half weeks of the 13 week quarter, which had a significant negative impact on the operations and financial results of the company.

ROM Production


--  Total run of mine (ROM) production from all operations for Q3 2013 was
    246,000 tonnes, a 40% decrease compared to 415,000 tonnes produced in Q2
    2013. 
    
--  Magdalena ROM production was 184,000 tonnes, a 35% decrease over Q2 2013
    production of 284,000 tonnes. 
    
--  Aviemore run of mine production was 62,000 tonnes, a 53% decrease over
    Q2 2013 of 131,000 tonnes. 

Saleable Production and Sales

The total saleable production at the Magdalena bituminous and Aviemore anthracite operations declined in the third quarter of 2013, when compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Total saleable production for the third quarter was 152,000 tonnes, a 41% decrease from the previous quarter.


--  Magdalena saleable production was 112,000 tonnes, a 37% decrease over
    second quarter 2013 production of 177,000 tonnes. 
    
--  Aviemore saleable production was 40,000 tonnes, a 49% decrease over
    second quarter 2013 production of 79,000 tonnes. 
    
--  In addition, Forbes Coal bought in 25,000 tonnes resulting in 177,000
    total saleable tonnes for the third quarter 2013. 
    
--  Total sales were 147,000 tonnes, a 48% decrease over second quarter 2013
    sales of 286,000 tonnes. 
    
--  The company exported 73,000 tonnes, with domestic sales of 74,000
    tonnes.

Full Financial Statements and the Management Discussion and Analysis Report will be available under the Forbes Coal profile at www.sedar.com or at www.forbescoal.com.


SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL RESULTS OF FORBES COAL DUNDEE                          
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Three months ended          Nine months ended 
                        ----------------------------------------------------
                           August  November  November   November   November 
                         31, 2012  30, 2012  30, 2011   30, 2012   30, 2011 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Run of Mine (ROM) (t)     414,551   246,002   354,003  1,047,628    987,770 
Run of Mine (ROM) coal                                                      
 purchased (t)                  -         -    21,660      1,569     21,660 
Saleable production (t)   256,583   152,013   246,570    653,201    672,483 
Saleable coal purchased,                                                    
 including adjustment                                                       
 (t)                       32,946    24,936    27,313     79,755     27,313 
Plant feed (t)            412,718   239,450   364,358  1,032,088    995,171 
Yield (%) on plant feed      62.2%     63.5%     67.7%      63.3%      67.6%
Inventory tonnes balance                                                    
 open                      73,144    80,407    82,425     41,109    189,778 
Inventory tonnes balance                                                    
 close                     80,407   102,924    38,258    102,924     38,258 
Sales (t)                 286,186   146,559   331,296    667,742    861,925 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue 000,000's (CAD)      23.4      10.8      31.2       55.0       86.0 
EBITDA 000,000's (CAD)        3.3      (1.4)      9.0        5.1       24.4 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAD: USD (average)           1.01      0.99      1.02       1.00       0.99 
ZAR: CAD (average)           8.21      8.69      7.77       8.25       7.30 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Selling price (average)                                                     
 / sold production                                                          
 tonnes (CAD)               81.73     73.91     94.03      82.40      99.78 
Selling price (average)                                                     
 / sold production                                                          
 tonnes (USD)               80.85     74.81     92.56      82.45     101.30 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash cost of sales and                                                      
 operating expenses                                                         
 000,000's (CAD)             18.3      11.1      20.5       45.6       57.1 
Cash cost of sales and                                                      
 operating expenses /                                                       
 sold production tonnes                                                     
 (CAD)                      63.95     75.96     61.76      68.31      66.19 
Cash cost of sales and                                                      
 operating expenses /                                                       
 sold production tonnes                                                     
 (USD)                      63.26     76.89     60.79      68.35      67.20 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures                                                        
 000,000's (CAD)             1.91      1.77     13.49       5.64      17.45 
Capital expenditures per                                                    
 t of saleable                                                              
 production (CAD)            7.45     11.65     54.69       8.63      25.95 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
(i) Numbers in this chart are derived from the Forbes Coal Dundee stand     
alone financial statements (See non -IFRS measures).                        

NON-IFRS PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The company has included in this document certain non-IFRS performance measures that are detailed below. These non-IFRS performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain investors use this information to evaluate the company's performance. Accordingly, they are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared with IFRS. The definition for these performance measures and reconciliation of the non-IFRS measures to reported IFRS measures are as follows:


EBITDA - Forbes Coal Consolidated                                           
                                                                            
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Three months ended         Nine months ended 
                         ---------------------------------------------------
                            August  November  November  November   November 
                          31, 2012  30, 2012  30, 2011  30, 2012   30, 2011 
                            $000's    $000's    $000's    $000's     $000's 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) for the                                                   
 period                       (226)   (4,972)    3,523    (6,788)     1,097 
  add back                                                                0 
Amortization and                                                            
 depletion                   2,738     1,993     3,907     7,538     12,355 
Income tax (recovery)                                                       
 expense                       (10)   (1,161)     (396)     (893)     2,672 
Foreign exchange (gain)         14         -    (1,203)        2     (1,131)
Fair value adjustment on                                                    
 endowment policy             (331)     (140)        -      (471)         - 
Interest and dividend                                                       
 expense (income)              407       588       306     1,577        827 
Change in estimates on                                                      
 contingent acquisition                                                     
 liability                       -         -       120         -        120 
Accretion                        -         -       475         -      1,540 
Business combination                                                        
 transaction costs               -       273         2       273         24 
Stock based compensation        11         6        64        35      1,996 
Loss on share-based                                                         
 payments                        -         -     1,488         -      1,488 
Unrealized (gain) on                                                        
 marked-to-market                                                           
 securities                    117        27       (54)      512        (54)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA Forbes Coal                                                          
 Consolidated                2,720    (3,386)    8,232     1,785     19,500 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                                                            
EBITDA - Forbes Coal Dundee Stand Alone                                     
                                                                            
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Three months ended         Nine months ended 
                         ---------------------------------------------------
                            August  November  November  November   November 
                          31, 2012  30, 2012  30, 2011  30, 2012   30, 2011 
                            $000's    $000's    $000's    $000's     $000's 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) for the                                                   
 period                       (226)   (4,972)    3,523    (6,788)     1,097 
  add back                                                                  
Amortization and                                                            
 depletion                   2,738     1,993     3,907     7,538     12,355 
Income tax (recovery)                                                       
 expense                       (10)   (1,161)     (396)     (893)     2,672 
Foreign exchange (gain)         14         -    (1,203)        2     (1,131)
Fair value adjustment on                                                    
 financial assets             (331)     (140)        -      (471)         - 
Interest and dividend                                                       
 expense (income)              407       588       306     1,577        827 
Change in estimates on                                                      
 contingent acquisition                                                     
 liability                       -         -       120         -        120 
Accretion                        -         -       475         -      1,540 
Business combination                                                        
 transaction costs               -       273         2       273         24 
Mineral properties                                                          
 investigation costs (Non                                                   
 FC Dundee)                      7         2       190        16        190 
Stock based compensation        11         6        64        35      1,996 
Loss on share-based                                                         
 payments                        -         -     1,488         -      1,488 
Unrealized loss (gain) on                                                   
 marked-to-market                                                           
 securities                    117        27       (54)      512        (54)
General and                                                                 
 administration (Non FC                                                     
 Dundee)                       608     1,957       615     3,255      3,320 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA Forbes Coal Dundee    3,335    (1,427)    9,037     5,056     24,444 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

About Forbes Coal

Forbes Coal is a growing coal producer in southern Africa. It holds a majority interest in two operating mines through its 100% interest in Forbes Coal (Pty) Ltd., a South African company ("Forbes Coal Dundee") which has a 70% interest in Zinoju Coal (Pty) Ltd. ("Zinoju"). Zinoju holds a 100% interest in the Magdalena bituminous mine and the Aviemore anthracite mine in South Africa (collectively, "the Forbes Coal Dundee Properties"). The mines have a substantial resource base and each mine has a projected life span in excess of 20 years. Forbes Coal is in the process of increasing production at both mines using existing infrastructure and capacity. The company has in-place transportation infrastructure allowing its coal to reach both export corridors and the growing domestic coal market. Forbes Coal has a strong balance sheet and an experienced coal-focused management team.

Please refer to the company's NI 43-101 compliant technical report on the Forbes Coal Dundee Properties dated March 1, 2011 entitled "Technical Report on Slater Coal and Subsidiaries, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa", available on the SEDAR profile of the Company at www.sedar.com. Additional information is available at www.forbescoal.com.

Cautionary Notes:

Johan Odendaal, B.Sc.(Geol.), B.Sc.(Hons)(Min. Econ.), M.Sc. (Min. Eng.), a director of Minxcon and an independent Qualified Person, as defined in National Instrument 43-101 has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this release.

The ability of Forbes Coal to increase production amounts has not been the subject of a feasibility study and there is no certainty that the proposed expansion will be economically feasible.

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the anticipated production results with respect to the Forbes Coal Dundee Properties, future financial or operating performance of Forbes Coal and its projects, statements regarding the anticipated improvements in logistical support and anticipated improvements in sales, statements made with respect to prospects for the business of Forbes Coal, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of the mineral exploration industry, environmental risks, acquisition of mining licences, title disputes or claims, limitations of insurance coverage and the timing and possible outcome of pending litigation and regulatory matters. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". Forward- looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Forbes Coal to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: general business, economic, competitive, foreign operations, political and social uncertainties; a history of operating losses; delay or failure to receive board or regulatory approvals; timing and availability of external financing on acceptable terms; not realizing on the potential benefits of the proposed transaction; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of mineral products; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; and, delays in obtaining governmental approvals or required financing or in the completion of activities. Although Forbes Coal has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forwardlooking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.