Welcome!

.NET Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Trevor Parsons, Peter Silva

News Feed Item

Autodesk Reports Third Quarter Results

Autodesk, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADSK) today reported financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.

Third Quarter Fiscal 2013

  • Revenue was $548 million, compared to $549 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
  • GAAP operating margin was 6 percent, compared to 16 percent in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
  • Non-GAAP operating margin increased 190 basis points to 26 percent, compared to 25 percent in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results is provided in the accompanying tables.
  • GAAP diluted earnings per share were $0.13, compared to $0.32 in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
  • Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share were $0.47, compared to $0.44 in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
  • Cash flow from operating activities was $157 million, compared to $138 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

"Our revenue results were disappointing and were primarily caused by a weakening demand environment," said Carl Bass, Autodesk president and CEO. "While we experienced pockets of relative strength in the U.S., northern Europe, and Russia, most other markets around the world slowed during the quarter, most notably emerging markets. Despite our overall revenue shortfall, our ongoing focus on cost management delivered meaningful margin expansion and EPS above our guidance range."

Third Quarter Operational Overview

EMEA revenue decreased 3 percent to $196 million, compared to the third quarter last year as reported and increased 3 percent on a constant currency basis. Revenue in the Americas increased 4 percent to $209 million, compared to the third quarter last year. Revenue in Asia Pacific (APAC) decreased 3 percent to $142 million, compared to the third quarter last year as reported and decreased 3 percent on a constant currency basis. Revenue from emerging economies decreased 9 percent to $80 million, compared to the third quarter last year as reported and 5 percent on a constant currency basis. Revenue from emerging economies represented 15 percent of total revenue in the third quarter.

Revenue from the Platform Solutions and Emerging Business (PSEB) segment decreased 2 percent to $205 million, compared to the third quarter last year. Revenue from the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) business segment increased 7 percent to $163 million, compared to the third quarter last year. Revenue from the Manufacturing business segment decreased 1 percent to $132 million, compared to the third quarter last year. Revenue from the Media and Entertainment business segment decreased 9 percent to $48 million, compared to the third quarter last year.

Revenue from Flagship products decreased 4 percent to $298 million, compared to the third quarter last year. Revenue from Suites increased 10 percent to $166 million, compared to the third quarter last year. Revenue from New and Adjacent products decreased 3 percent to $84 million, compared to the third quarter last year.

In the third quarter last year, Autodesk recognized a $10 million, one-time transaction, related to license compliance. This transaction impacted revenue growth rates for license and other, APAC, PSEB, and Flagship. In addition, Superstorm Sandy negatively impacted our business during the last few days of the quarter.

Deferred revenue increased 15 percent to $714 million, compared to the third quarter last year.

"We achieved strong growth in non-GAAP operating margin, better than expected EPS, strong cash flow from operations, and growth in deferred revenue," said Mark Hawkins, Autodesk executive vice president, chief financial officer. "While our revenue growth target for fiscal 2013 is below our original target, we believe we can still achieve year-over-year non-GAAP operating margin expansion of between 80 and 140 basis points. With over $1.7 billion in cash and marketable securities, our balance sheet remains solid.

"Looking forward, due to the increasing uncertainty in the macroeconomic environment and our slower than planned revenue growth in fiscal 2013, we are reassessing our long-term financial model (through fiscal 2015) and are not providing revenue targets at this time," continued Hawkins. "While revenue growth will be a key determining factor in the years to come, we remain committed to growing our non-GAAP operating margin and believe we can achieve a 30+ percent run rate as we exit our fiscal 2015."

Business Outlook

The following statements are forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations and assumptions, and involve risks and uncertainties some of which are set forth below. Autodesk's business outlook for the fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2013 assumes a continuation of the current economic environment and foreign exchange currency rate environment.

Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2013

4Q FY13 Guidance Metrics        

4Q FY13 (ending January 31, 2013)

Revenue (in millions) $570 - $600
EPS GAAP $0.18 - $0.26
EPS Non-GAAP $0.43 - $0.51
 

Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share exclude $0.13 related to stock-based compensation expense, $0.03 related to restructuring charges, and $0.09 for the amortization of acquisition related intangibles, net of tax.

Full Year Fiscal 2013

FY13 Guidance Metrics         FY13 (ending January 31, 2013)
Revenue (in millions) $2,275 - $2,305
EPS GAAP $0.92 - $1.00
EPS Non-GAAP $1.84 - $1.92
 

Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share exclude $0.50 related to stock-based compensation expense, $0.14 related to restructuring charges, $0.26 for the amortization of acquisition related intangibles and $0.02 for loss on strategic investments, net of tax.

A reconciliation between the GAAP and non-GAAP estimates for fiscal 2013 is provided in the tables following this press release.

Both fourth quarter fiscal 2013 and full year fiscal 2013 outlooks assume annual effective tax rates of approximately 24.5 percent and 25.5 percent for GAAP and non-GAAP results, respectively. These rates do not include the federal R&D tax credit benefit, which expired on December 31, 2011, or one-time discrete items. The assumed effective tax rate will be adjusted if or when there is a renewal of the tax credit.

Earnings Conference Call and Webcast

Autodesk will host its third quarter conference call today at 5:00 p.m. ET. The live broadcast can be accessed at http://www.autodesk.com/investors. Supplemental financial information and prepared remarks for the conference call will be posted to the investor relations section of Autodesk's website simultaneously with this press release.

NOTE: The prepared remarks will not be read on the conference call. The conference call will include only brief remarks followed by questions and answers.

A replay of the broadcast will be available at 7:00 pm ET at http://www.autodesk.com/investors. This replay will be maintained on Autodesk's website for at least 12 months.

Safe Harbor Statement

This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding our long-term financial model; statements in the paragraphs under “Business Outlook” above, and other statements regarding our expected financial, strategies, market and products positions, performance, and results. There are a significant number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from statements made in this press release, including: general market, political, economic and business conditions; failure to maintain our revenue growth and profitability; failure to maintain cost reductions and productivity increases or otherwise control our expenses; the success of our internal reorganization and restructuring activities; our performance in particular geographies, including emerging economies; the ability of governments around the world to meet their financial and debt obligations, and finance infrastructure projects; failure to successfully incorporate sales of licenses of products suites into our overall sales strategy; weak or negative growth in the industries we serve; failure to successfully expand adoption of our products; slowing momentum in maintenance billings or revenues; difficulties encountered in integrating new or acquired businesses and technologies; the inability to identify and realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; the financial and business condition of our reseller and distribution channels; dependence on and the timing of large transactions; fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates; the success of our foreign currency hedging program; failure to achieve sufficient sell-through in our channels for new or existing products; pricing pressure; unexpected fluctuations in our tax rate; the timing and degree of expected investments in growth and efficiency opportunities; changes in the timing of product releases and retirements; failure of key new applications to achieve anticipated levels of customer acceptance; failure to achieve continued success in technology advancements, interruptions or terminations in the business of Autodesk consultants; the expense and impact of legal or regulatory proceedings; and any unanticipated accounting charges.

Further information on potential factors that could affect the financial results of Autodesk are included in Autodesk's report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2012 and Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended April 30 and July 31, 2012, which are on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Autodesk does not assume any obligation to update the forward-looking statements provided to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

About Autodesk

Autodesk, Inc., is a leader in 3D design, engineering and entertainment software. Customers across the manufacturing, architecture, building, construction, and media and entertainment industries - including the last 17 Academy Award winners for Best Visual Effects - use Autodesk software to design, visualize, and simulate their ideas. Since its introduction of AutoCAD software in 1982, Autodesk continues to develop the broadest portfolio of state-of-the-art software for global markets. For additional information about Autodesk, visit www.autodesk.com.

Autodesk and AutoCAD are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. Academy Award is a registered trademark of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to their respective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product and service offerings, and specifications and pricing at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document.

© 2012 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Autodesk, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In millions, except per share data)

 
 

Three Months Ended
October 31,

 

Nine Months Ended
October 31,

2012   2011 2012   2011
(Unaudited)
Net revenue:
License and other $ 317.1 $ 331.4 $ 1,018.6 $ 987.4
Maintenance 230.9   217.2   686.7   635.8  
Total net revenue 548.0   548.6   1,705.3   1,623.2  
Cost of revenue:
Cost of license and other revenue 49.6 50.5 145.8 138.8
Cost of maintenance revenue 8.4   9.1   30.8   32.8  
Total cost of revenue 58.0   59.6   176.6   171.6  
Gross profit 490.0 489.0 1,528.7 1,451.6
Operating expenses:
Marketing and sales 204.6 206.2 640.2 609.1
Research and development 153.6 141.2 451.2 417.0
General and administrative 62.3 51.4 180.9 163.0
Restructuring charges (benefits), net 35.2     35.2  

(1.3

)
Total operating expenses 455.7   398.8   1,307.5   1,187.8  
Income from operations 34.3 90.2 221.2 263.8
Interest and other (expense) income, net (0.1 ) 1.1   2.6   6.2  
Income before income taxes 34.2 91.3 223.8 270.0
Provision for income taxes (4.9 ) (18.5 ) (51.0 ) (56.7 )
Net income $ 29.3   $ 72.8   $ 172.8   $ 213.3  
Basic net income per share $ 0.13   $ 0.32   $ 0.76   $ 0.93  
Diluted net income per share $ 0.13   $ 0.32   $ 0.74   $ 0.91  
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per share 225.5   227.1   227.1   228.2  
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per share 230.5   230.7   232.0   233.7  
 

 

Autodesk, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In millions)

   

October 31,
2012

January 31,
2012

(Unaudited)
 
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 827.0 $ 1,156.9
Marketable securities 502.1 254.4
Accounts receivable, net 293.3 395.1
Deferred income taxes 48.4 30.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 53.8   59.4
Total current assets 1,724.6   1,895.9
Marketable securities 408.3 192.8
Computer equipment, software, furniture and leasehold improvements, net 114.6 104.5
Purchased technologies, net 75.9 84.6
Goodwill 824.6 682.4
Deferred income taxes, net 128.3 135.8
Other assets 152.9   131.8
$ 3,429.2   $ 3,227.8
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 75.9 $ 89.3
Accrued compensation 155.6 183.9
Accrued income taxes 14.2 14.4
Deferred revenue 558.1 582.3
Borrowings under line of credit 110.0
Other accrued liabilities 71.6   84.2
Total current liabilities 985.4   954.1
Deferred revenue 155.6 136.9
Long term income taxes payable 184.4 174.8
Other liabilities 86.0 79.1
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock
Common stock and additional paid-in capital 1,438.9 1,365.4
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (6.4 ) 5.9
Retained earnings 585.3   511.6
Total stockholders’ equity 2,017.8   1,882.9
$ 3,429.2   $ 3,227.8
 
 

Autodesk, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In millions)

 
  Nine Months Ended October 31,
2012   2011
(Unaudited)
Operating activities:
Net income $ 172.8 $ 213.3
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 93.1 85.2
Stock-based compensation expense 118.8 78.8
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation (27.4 ) (33.0 )
Restructuring charges (benefits), net 35.2 (1.3 )
Other operating activities 4.4
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business combinations 6.6   55.3  
Net cash provided by operating activities 403.5   398.3  
Investing activities:
Purchases of marketable securities (1,103.1 ) (456.0 )
Sales of marketable securities 207.0 110.8
Maturities of marketable securities 436.6 307.0
Capital expenditures (44.7 ) (48.7 )
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (204.2 ) (182.7 )
Other investing activities (22.1 ) (23.5 )
Net cash used in investing activities (730.5 ) (293.1 )
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs 199.6 156.3
Repurchases of common stock (340.5 ) (263.7 )
Draws on line of credit 110.0
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 27.4   33.0  
Net cash used in financing activities (3.5 ) (74.4 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 0.6   (2.6 )
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (329.9 ) 28.2
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year 1,156.9   1,075.1  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 827.0   $ 1,103.3  
 
 

Autodesk, Inc.

Reconciliation of GAAP financial measures to non-GAAP financial measures

(In millions, except per share data)

 

To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis, Autodesk provides investors with certain non-GAAP measures including non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP net income per share, non-GAAP cost of license and other revenue, non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP restructuring charges, non-GAAP income from operations and non-GAAP provision for income taxes. These non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted to exclude certain costs, expenses, gains and losses, including stock-based compensation expense, amortization of purchased intangibles, restructuring charges, gain and loss on strategic investments, discrete tax provision items and related income tax expenses. See our reconciliation of GAAP financial measures to non-GAAP financial measures herein. We believe these exclusions are appropriate to enhance an overall understanding of our past financial performance and also our prospects for the future, as well as to facilitate comparisons with our historical operating results. These adjustments to our GAAP results are made with the intent of providing both management and investors a more complete understanding of Autodesk's underlying operational results and trends and our marketplace performance. For example, the non-GAAP results are an indication of our baseline performance before gains, losses or other charges that are considered by management to be outside our core operating results. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are among the primary indicators management uses as a basis for our planning and forecasting of future periods.

There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. The non-GAAP financial measures are limited in value because they exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Investors should review the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures as provided in the tables accompanying this press release.

The following table shows Autodesk's non-GAAP results reconciled to GAAP results included in this release.

 
  Three Months Ended
October 31,
  Nine Months Ended
October 31,
2012   2011 2012   2011
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
 
GAAP cost of license and other revenue $ 49.6 $ 50.5 $ 145.8 $ 138.8
Stock-based compensation expense (1.3 ) (0.9 ) (3.8 ) (2.8 )
Amortization of developed technology (9.9 ) (11.1 ) (29.3 ) (27.7 )
Non-GAAP cost of license and other revenue $ 38.4   $ 38.5   $ 112.7   $ 108.3  
 
GAAP gross profit $ 490.0 $ 489.0 $ 1,528.7 $ 1,451.6
Stock-based compensation expense 1.3 0.9 3.8 2.8
Amortization of developed technology 9.9   11.1   29.3   27.7  
Non-GAAP gross profit $ 501.2   $ 501.0   $ 1,561.8   $ 1,482.1  
 
GAAP marketing and sales $ 204.6 $ 206.2 $ 640.2 $ 609.1
Stock-based compensation expense (16.6 ) (11.7 ) (47.3 ) (34.8 )
Non-GAAP marketing and sales $ 188.0   $ 194.5   $ 592.9   $ 574.3  
 
GAAP research and development $ 153.6 $ 141.2 $ 451.2 $ 417.0
Stock-based compensation expense (28.1 ) (8.9 ) (49.6 ) (27.6 )
Non-GAAP research and development $ 125.5   $ 132.3   $ 401.6   $ 389.4  
 
GAAP general and administrative $ 62.3 $ 51.4 $ 180.9 $ 163.0
Stock-based compensation expense (5.8 ) (4.1 ) (18.0 ) (13.6 )
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names (13.8 ) (8.2 ) (29.5 ) (24.0 )
Non-GAAP general and administrative $ 42.7   $ 39.1   $ 133.4   $ 125.4  
 
GAAP restructuring charges (benefits), net $ 35.2 $ $ 35.2 $ (1.3 )
Restructuring charges (benefits) (35.2 )   (35.2 ) 1.3  
Non-GAAP restructuring charges (benefits), net $   $   $   $  
 
GAAP operating expenses $ 455.7 $ 398.8 $ 1,307.5 $ 1,187.8
Stock-based compensation expense (50.5 ) (24.7 ) (114.9 ) (76.0 )
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names (13.8 ) (8.2 ) (29.5 ) (24.0 )
Restructuring (charges) benefits (35.2 )   (35.2 ) 1.3  
Non-GAAP operating expenses $ 356.2   $ 365.9   $ 1,127.9   $ 1,089.1  
 
GAAP income from operations $ 34.3 $ 90.2 $ 221.2 $ 263.8
Stock-based compensation expense 51.8 25.6 118.7 78.8
Amortization of developed technology 9.9 11.1 29.3 27.7
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names 13.8 8.2 29.5 24.0
Restructuring charges (benefits) 35.2     35.2   (1.3 )
Non-GAAP income from operations $ 145.0   $ 135.1   $ 433.9   $ 393.0  
 
GAAP interest and other income (expense), net $ (0.1 ) $ 1.1 $ 2.6 $ 6.2
(Gain) loss on strategic investments (1) (0.1 )   3.8    
Non-GAAP interest and other income (expense), net $ (0.2 ) $ 1.1   $ 6.4   $ 6.2  
 
GAAP provision for income taxes $ (4.9 ) $ (18.5 ) $ (51.0 ) $ (56.7 )
Discrete GAAP tax provision items (15.4 ) (4.2 ) (19.0 ) (7.4 )
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (16.7 ) (11.4 ) (42.3 ) (35.8 )
Non-GAAP provision for income tax $ (37.0 ) $ (34.1 ) $ (112.3 ) $ (99.9 )
 
GAAP net income $ 29.3 $ 72.8 $ 172.8 $ 213.3
Stock-based compensation expense 51.8 25.6 118.7 78.8
Amortization of developed technology 9.9 11.1 29.3 27.7
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names 13.8 8.2 29.5 24.0
Restructuring charges (benefits) 35.2 35.2 (1.3 )
(Gain) loss on strategic investments (1) (0.1 ) 3.8
Discrete GAAP tax provision items (15.4 ) (4.2 ) (19.0 ) (7.4 )
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (16.7 ) (11.4 ) (42.3 ) (35.8 )
Non-GAAP net income $ 107.8   $ 102.1   $ 328.0   $ 299.3  
 
GAAP diluted net income per share $ 0.13 0.32 0.74 0.91
Stock-based compensation expense 0.23 0.11 0.51 0.34
Amortization of developed technology 0.04 0.05 0.13 0.12
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names 0.06 0.03 0.13 0.10
Restructuring charges (benefits) 0.15 0.15 (0.01 )
(Gain) loss on strategic investments (1) 0.01
Discrete GAAP tax provision items (0.07 ) (0.02 ) (0.08 ) (0.03 )
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (0.07 ) (0.05 ) (0.18 ) (0.15 )
Non-GAAP diluted net income per share $ 0.47   0.44   1.41   1.28  
 

(1) Effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, Autodesk began excluding gains and losses on strategic investments for purposes of its non-GAAP financial measures. Prior period non-GAAP interest and other income (expense), net, net income and earnings per share amounts have been revised to conform to the current period presentation.

 

Autodesk

Other Supplemental Financial Information (a)

 

Fiscal Year 2013

 

QTR 1

 

QTR 2

 

QTR 3

 

YTD 2013

Financial Statistics ($ in millions, except per share data):        
Total Net Revenue $ 589 $ 569 $ 548 $ 1,705
License and Other Revenue $ 361 $ 341 $ 317 $ 1,019
Maintenance Revenue $ 228 $ 228 $ 231 $ 687
 
GAAP Gross Margin 90 % 89 % 89 % 90 %
Non-GAAP Gross Margin (1)(2) 92 % 91 % 91 % 92 %
 
GAAP Operating Expenses $ 436 $ 416 $ 456 $ 1,308
GAAP Operating Margin 16 % 16 % 6 % 13 %
GAAP Net Income $ 79 $ 65 $ 29 $ 173
GAAP Diluted Net Income Per Share (b) $ 0.34 $ 0.28 $ 0.13 $ 0.74
 
Non-GAAP Operating Expenses (1)(3) $ 396 $ 376 $ 356 $

1,128

Non-GAAP Operating Margin (1)(4) 25 % 25 % 26 % 25 %
Non-GAAP Net Income (1)(5)(c) $ 109 $ 111 $ 108 $ 328
Non-GAAP Diluted Net Income Per Share (1)(6)(b)(c) $ 0.47 $ 0.48 $ 0.47 $ 1.41
 
Total Cash and Marketable Securities $ 1,796 $ 1,717 $ 1,737 $ 1,737
Days Sales Outstanding 46 58 49 49
Capital Expenditures $ 12 $ 17 $ 17 $ 45
Cash Flow from Operating Activities $ 139 $ 107 $ 157 $ 404
GAAP Depreciation and Amortization $ 29 $ 29 $ 35 $ 93
 
Deferred Maintenance Revenue Balance 648 672 634 634
 
Revenue by Geography:
Americas $ 208 $ 199 $ 209 $ 616
Europe, Middle East and Africa $ 224 $ 210 $ 196 $ 630
Asia Pacific $ 157 $ 161 $ 142 $ 460
% of Total Rev from Emerging Economies 14 % 15 % 15 % 15 %
 
Revenue by Segment (c):
Platform Solutions and Emerging Business $ 229 $ 217 $ 205 $ 650
Architecture, Engineering and Construction $ 163 $ 162 $ 163 $ 489
Manufacturing $ 146 $ 141 $ 132 $ 419
Media and Entertainment $ 51 $ 49 $ 48 $ 148
 
Other Revenue Statistics (c):
% of Total Rev from Flagship 58 % 56 % 55 % 56 %
% of Total Rev from Suites 28 % 29 % 30 % 29 %
% of Total Rev from New and Adjacent 14 % 14 % 15 % 15 %
% of Total Rev from AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT 35 % 34 % 33 % 34 %
Upgrade and Crossgrade Revenue $ 50 $ 34 $ 32 $ 116
 

Favorable (Unfavorable) Impact of U.S. Dollar Translation Relative to Foreign
Currencies Compared to Comparable Prior Year Period:

FX Impact on Total Net Revenue $ 14 $ (1 ) $ (10 ) $ 2
FX Impact on Cost of Revenue and Total Operating Expenses $ (2 ) $ 6 $ 7 $ 12
FX Impact on Operating Income $ 12 $ 5 $ (3 ) $ 14
 
Gross Margin by Segment (c):
Platform Solutions and Emerging Business $ 216 $ 203 $ 191 $ 610
Architecture, Engineering and Construction $ 149 $ 147 $ 150 $ 446
Manufacturing $ 134 $ 130 $ 122 $ 387
Media and Entertainment $ 42 $ 39 $ 38 $ 119
Unallocated amounts $ (11 ) $ (11 ) $ (11 ) $ (33 )
 
Common Stock Statistics:
Common Shares Outstanding 229.7 226.7 224.5 224.5
Fully Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 234.1 232.1 230.5 232.0
Shares Repurchased 2.5 3.4 4.0 9.9
 

(a) Totals may not agree with the sum of the components due to rounding.

(b) Earnings per share were computed independently for each of the periods presented; therefore the sum of the earnings per share amounts for the quarters may not equal the total for the year.

(c) Prior amounts have been conformed to align with the current period presentation.

(1) To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a GAAP basis, Autodesk provides investors with certain non-GAAP measures including non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP net income per share, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, and non-GAAP operating margin. These non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted to exclude certain costs, expenses, gains and losses, including stock-based compensation expense, restructuring charges, amortization of purchased intangibles, gain and loss on strategic investment, and related income tax expenses. See our reconciliation of GAAP financial measures to non-GAAP financial measures herein. We believe these exclusions are appropriate to enhance an overall understanding of our past financial performance and also our prospects for the future, as well as to facilitate comparisons with our historical operating results. These adjustments to our GAAP results are made with the intent of providing both management and investors a more complete understanding of Autodesk's underlying operational results and trends and our marketplace performance. For example, the non-GAAP results are an indication of our baseline performance before gains, losses or other charges that are considered by management to be outside our core operating results. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are among the primary indicators management uses as a basis for our planning and forecasting of future periods. There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. The non-GAAP financial measures are limited in value because they exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Investors should review the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures as provided in the tables accompanying Autodesk's press release.

 

   

 

QTR 1

 

QTR 2

 

QTR 3

   

YTD 2013

 

       
(2) GAAP Gross Margin 90 % 89 % 89 % 90 %
Stock-based compensation expense
Amortization of developed technology 2 %   2 %   2 %     2 %
Non-GAAP Gross Margin 92 % 91 % 91 % 92 %
 
(3) GAAP Operating Expenses $ 436 $ 416 $ 456 $ 1,308
Stock-based compensation expense (32 ) (32 ) (51 ) (115 )
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names (8 ) (8 ) (14 ) (30 )
Restructuring benefits (charges), net         (35 )     (35 )
Non-GAAP Operating Expenses $ 396 $ 376 $ 356 $ 1,128
 
(4) GAAP Operating Margin 16 % 16 % 6 % 13 %
Stock-based compensation expense 6 % 6 % 9 % 7 %
Amortization of developed technology 2 % 2 % 2 % 1 %
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names 1 % 1 % 3 % 2 %
Restructuring charges, net         6 %     2 %
Non-GAAP Operating Margin 25 % 25 % 26 % 25 %
 
(5) GAAP Net Income $ 79 $ 65 $ 29 $ 173
Stock-based compensation expense 33 34 52 119
Amortization of developed technology 10 10 10 29
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names 8 8 14 30
Restructuring charges, net 35 35
(Gain) loss on strategic investments (7) (1 ) 5 4
Discrete GAAP tax provision items (6 ) 3 (15 ) (19 )
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (14 )   (12 )   (17 )     (42 )
Non-GAAP Net Income $ 109 $ 111 $ 108 $ 328
 
(6) GAAP Diluted Net Income Per Share $ 0.34 $ 0.28 $ 0.13 $ 0.74
Stock-based compensation expense 0.14 0.15 0.23 0.51
Amortization of developed technology 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.13
Amortization of customer relationships and trade names 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.13
Restructuring charges, net 0.15 0.15
(Gain) loss on strategic investments (7) 0.02 0.01
Discrete GAAP tax provision items (0.03 ) 0.01 (0.07 ) (0.08 )
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (0.05 )   (0.05 )   (0.07 )     (0.18 )
Non-GAAP Diluted Net Income Per Share $ 0.47 $ 0.48 $ 0.47 $ 1.41
 

(7) Effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, Autodesk began excluding gains and losses on strategic investments for purposes of its non-GAAP financial measures. Prior period non-GAAP interest and other income (expense), net, net income and earnings per share amounts have been revised to conform to the current period presentation.

 
 
Reconciliation for Fiscal 2013:    
 
The following is a reconciliation of anticipated fiscal 2013 GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins:
FISCAL 2013

Non-GAAP Revenue Guidance Range (in millions)

$2,275 $ 2,305  
GAAP operating margin basis point improvement over prior year

(375

)

(295

)
Stock-based compensation expense

205

195

Amortization of purchased intangibles 50

45

Restructuring charges

200

 

195

 
Non-GAAP operating margin basis point improvement over prior year 80   140  
 

Reconciliation for Long Term Operating Margins:

Autodesk is not able to provide targets for our long term (ending with fiscal year 2015) GAAP operating margins at this time because of the difficulty of estimating certain items that are excluded from non-GAAP that affect operating margin, such as charges related to stock-based compensation expense and amortization of acquisition related intangibles, the effect of which may be significant.

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.