Click here to close now.


Microsoft Cloud Authors: Jordan Sanders, Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Keith Mayer, Jayaram Krishnaswamy

News Feed Item

BNK Petroleum Inc. Announces 3rd Quarter 2012 results

CALGARY, November 13, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --

All amounts are in U.S. Dollars unless otherwise indicated:

                                     Third Quarter            First Nine Months
                                     2012     2011     %        2012      2011      %
    Earnings (Loss):
    $ Thousands                   $(4,260)   $(274)    L    $(10,410)      $18      L
    $ per common share             $(0.03)   $0.00     L      $(0.07)    $0.00      L
    assuming dilution
    Capital Expenditures          $12,746  $11,436    11%    $36,104   $23,180     56%
    Average Production (Boepd)      1,547    1,868   (17%)     1,547     1,503      3%
    Average Product Price 
    per Barrel                     $34.11   $46.81   (27%)    $35.01    $46.79    (25%)
    Average Netback per Barrel     $17.77   $28.27   (37%)    $17.71    $27.56    (36%)

                                  9/30/2012        12/31/2011          9/30/2011
    Cash and Cash Equivalents      $10,285          $40,496             $41,957
    Working Capital                 $7,904          $39,697             $46,154

BNK's President and Chief Executive Officer, Wolf Regener commented:

"Third Quarter results reflect our continued investment in Poland as we seek to discover new large shale gas reserves in that country as well as continued investment in our Oklahoma assets.  In Poland we believe we are much closer to proving that shale gas will work in Europe with our Gapowo B-1 well results.  We are looking forward to obtaining the approvals needed to drill the lateral to test the overpressured, high gas show intervals that we encountered.  In the United States our production from the Woodford shale has begun increasing once again and we look forward to further evaluation of the mainly oil producing Caney/Sycamore lime interval in the same field.  The Caney/Sycamore lime could add substantial reserves and it should generate much higher net backs since it is anticipated to be mainly oil, based on our early results.

In the third quarter the Company incurred a loss of $4.3 million versus a loss of $.3 million in the third quarter of 2011.  For the first nine months of 2012 the Company incurred a loss of $10.4 million versus a profit of $18,000 earned in the first nine months of 2011.  In the third quarter oil and gas revenues before royalties were up $549,000 over 2nd quarter 2012, but declined $3.2 million in comparison to the third quarter 2011, due to a lower average natural gas prices and NGL prices coupled with reduced average total daily production.  Other income in the third quarter declined $1.1 million due to lower management fee income.

For the comparative nine month periods oil and gas revenues before royalties declined $4.4 million due to lower natural gas and NGL prices.  Other income in the comparative nine month period declined $2.5 million due to a sale of seismic data in 2011 and lower management fee income.  Expenses increased $3.6 million between the comparative nine month periods due to higher general and administrative expenses resulting from the Company's expanding European operations.

Capital expenditures were $12.7 million in the quarter and $36.1 million through the first nine months of 2012 as we continue to explore for large shale gas reserves in Poland through our 100% owned Indiana Investments Sp z o. o. subsidiary ("Indiana") and further develop our Tishomingo assets both in operated and non-operated wells primarily operated by XTO Energy.

As recently announced we remain very encouraged with the data we have obtained from analyzing the core samples obtained from the Gapowo B-1 well in Poland.   The data validates our geologic model of increasing thickness and organic content over the target interval and are consistent with analyses indicating over pressured permeable shales.  We await approval to drill a lateral out of the Gapowo B-1 wellbore.  

The Company's ongoing analysis in Germany has determined that a number of the targets that the Company is pursuing have a higher risk profile due to new data gathered. The Company will be deciding whether to continue pursuing a number of these projects in the coming months.

We are excited about the results of our testing of the Company operated horizontal Barnes 6-2H well targeting the Lower Caney and Upper Sycamore formations in Oklahoma.   After fracture stimulation we are seeing production in the range of 170 to 250 barrels of equivalent oil per day with 80% of that production being crude oil after flowing back only 32% of the fracture stimulation fluid.  Accordingly we expect to see higher production as flow back increases.  Testing of the Sycamore and two lower zones of the Caney formation will confirm the production rates of each zone and the data obtained will be used to position future horizontal wells to maximize production rates.  

We are exploring several options to secure new sources of working capital.  These include up front cash proceeds obtained from a possible farm-out arrangement relating to certain of our European concessions, a potential increase in the borrowing base against our Oklahoma assets as well as potential proceeds from selling additional equity in the Company.  We are confident that the combination of cash on hand, cash from operations and these potential new sources of working capital if successfully completed will be sufficient to meet the cash needs of the Company for the foreseeable future.


  • Capital Expenditures increased 11% in the quarter to $12.7 million of which $7.1 million was spent in Poland relating to our Indiana concession and $5.0 million was spent in Oklahoma primarily to develop the Caney formation
  • The Polish Ministry of Environment provided positive Environmental Decisions allowing the Company to drill slightly deeper at both the Miszewo T-1 and Gapowo B-1 wells
  • The Company-operated Barnes 6-2H well in Oklahoma targeting the Lower Caney and Upper Sycamore formations (Mississippi Lime Equivalent) was fracture stimulated in 13 stages over an approximate 4,300 lateral
  • Cash used from operating activities before changes in working capital and long-term receivables was a negative $234,000 in the quarter
  • Loss of $4.3 million versus a loss of $.3 million in the third quarter of 2011 due to lower oil and gas revenues of $2.6 million and lower other income of $1.1 million
  • Cash and working capital totaled $10.3 million and $7.9 million respectively at September 30, 2012

Third Quarter 2012 to Third Quarter 2011

Oil and gas revenues before royalties declined 40% or $3,191,000 in the quarter to $4,855,000.   Oil revenues were $2,170,000 in the quarter versus $3,396,000 in the third quarter of 2011 or a decline of 36% as average oil production in the comparative quarters declined 39% due to normal declines from existing wells and not many new wells being drilled in 2012.  Average crude oil prices increased 5% between quarters to an average of $90.03 a barrel.  Natural gas revenues declined 48% to $902,000 as natural gas prices declined 37% between quarters while natural gas production declined 16%.  Natural Gas Liquids (NGLs) revenue declined 39% to $1,783,000 as average NGL prices declined 37% while NGL production between quarters declined 4%.

Other income declined $1,163,000 between quarters due to lower management fees relating to its role as Manager of Saponis Investments Sp z o.o. ("Saponis").

Exploration and evaluation expenses declined $209,000 as more pre-concession costs were incurred in the third quarter of 2011.  Production and operating expenses declined 16% commensurate with the 17% decline in average daily production between quarters.

General and administrative expenses increased 21% or $677,000 to $3,940,000 primarily due to higher payroll and associated costs of $431,000 and higher professional fees.

Stock Based Compensation expense declined $295,000 to $210,000 due to fewer stock options being granted. Legal restructuring expenses declined $435,000 to $135,000 as the legal restructuring of the Company's European operations is nearing completion.

Finance Income declined $1,736,000 to $490,000 as 2011 results included a $1,797,000 unrealized gain on financial commodity contracts.  Finance Expense declined $1,028,000 between quarters to $1,781,000 primarily due to lower foreign currency losses between quarters of $2,272,000 partially offset by an unrealized loss in the third quarter of 2012 of $1,091,000 on financial commodity contracts.

Cash declined $7,026,000 in the past three months due to $12,746,000 in capital expenditures, a loss net of non-cash charges in the third quarter of $441,000 offset by increased borrowings of $4,200,000 plus changes in working capital. The Company estimates that it incurred $5,700,000 in additions to Exploration and Evaluation Assets as a direct result of the requirement to obtain a positive Environmental Decision from the Polish Ministry of Environment to drill slightly deeper than allowed in the original concession applications.

Exploration and evaluation assets increased $8,247,000 in the quarter primarily relating to drilling and seismic costs pertaining to the Company's Indiana concession.  

Trade and other payables increased $3,628,000 primarily resulting from costs incurred in Poland while loans and borrowings increased $4,261,000 due to increased borrowings of $4,200,000 in the quarter and amortization of debt issue costs.


  • Capital expenditures increased 56% or $12.9 million to $36.1 million of which $26.2 million relates to capital expenditures incurred at our Indiana concession, $8.6 million incurred in Oklahoma and $1.3 million in the rest of Europe
  • Average production increased 3% to 1,547 barrels a day
  • Average product prices declined 25%
  • A net loss of $10.4 million was incurred versus a profit of $18,000 in 2011 primarily due to lower oil and gas revenues of $4.4 million, higher general and administrative expenses of $4.8 million and lower finance income of $.9 million

First Nine Months 2012 to First Nine Months 2011:

Oil and natural gas revenues before royalties declined 23% or $4,355,000 to $14,844,000.  Oil revenues decreased 12% or $888,000 to $6,703,000 due to a 15% reduction in production as natural declines set in from higher activity levels in 2011 than 2012.  Average crude oil prices increased 3% to $93.63 a barrel.  Natural gas revenues declined 36% or $1,480,000 to $2,592,000 due to a 41% decline in average natural gas prices to $2.43 an mcf.  Through nine months natural gas production has increased 8%.  NGL revenues declined 26% or $1,989,000 to $5,547,000 due to average NGL prices declining 31%.  NGL production has increased 7% between periods.

Other income declined $2,479,000 to $735,000 due to the sale of seismic data in 2011 and lower management fees.

Exploration and evaluation expenses declined $1,283,000 to $310,000 due to the write-off of the investment in Black Warrior of $1,091,000 in 2011 and higher pre-concession costs last year.

Production and operating expenses increased 6% or $258,000 to $4,549,000 as average production   increased 3% and current year operating expenses include $390,000 in workover expenses partially offset by the rebate of production taxes in Oklahoma.

Depletion and depreciation expense increased 21% or $906,000 to $5,205,000 primarily due to increased production applied on a higher depletable base.

General and administrative expenses increased $4,775,000 or 66% to $12,064,000 due to increased payroll and related costs of $2,173,000 and increased professional fees (legal, accounting, trust services, public relations and consulting) primarily related to our European operations of $2,202,000 and higher rent and office costs of $217,000.

Stock based compensation declined $1,110,000 or 62% to $685,000 due to fewer stock options being issued.

Finance income declined $864,000 to $1,260,000 primarily due to lower net gains on financial commodity contracts of $985,000.  Finance expense declined $324,000 primarily due to reduced foreign exchange losses between periods of $675,000.

Cash has declined $30,211,000 since yearend 2011 primarily due to capital expenditures of $36,104,000, losses less non-cash charges of $4,107,000 net of $8,200,000 in new borrowing plus changes in working capital.

                                BNK PETROLEUM INC.
           (Unaudited, Expressed in Thousands of United States Dollars)

                                             September 30,     December 31,
                                                  2012            2011
    Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents              $      10,285  $       40,496
    Trade and other receivables                   14,583          11,509
    Deposits and prepaid expenses                  2,697           2,309
    Fair value of commodity contracts                817             738
                                                  28,382          55,052
    Non-current assets
    Long-term receivables                          1,511           1,928
    Fair value of commodity contracts                126             311
    Property, plant and equipment                154,107         150,313
    Exploration and evaluation assets             42,860          14,911
                                                 198,604         167,463
    Total assets                           $     226,986  $      222,515
    Current liabilities
    Trade and other payables               $      20,478  $       15,355
    Non-current liabilities
    Loans and borrowings                          31,736          23,353
    Asset retirement obligations                   1,826           1,769
    Warrants                                          16             262
                                                  33,578          25,384
    Share capital                                247,326         247,207
    Contributed surplus                           16,220          14,775
    Deficit                                     (90,616)        (80,206)
    Total equity                                 172,930         181,776
    Total equity and liabilities           $     226,986  $      222,515

                                BNK PETROLEUM INC.
           (Unaudited, expressed in Thousands of United States dollars,
                            except per share amounts)
                                      Third Quarter        First Nine Months
                                    2012        2011        2012        2011
    Oil and natural gas
    revenue, net of royalties   $    3,946   $   6,537  $   12,061  $   15,599
    Gathering income                   330         404       1,064       1,354
    Other income                       260       1,423         735       3,214
                                     4,536       8,364      13,860      20,167
    Exploration and evaluation
    expenditures                        49         258         310       1,593
    Production and operating
    expenses                         1,414       1,678       4,549       4,291
    Depletion and depreciation       1,757       1,781       5,205       4,299
    General and administrative
    expenses                         3,940       3,263      12,064       7,289
    Stock based compensation           210         505         685       1,795
    Legal restructuring
    expenses                           135         570       1,015         980
                                     7,505       8,055      23,828      20,247
    Finance income                     490       2,226       1,260       2,124
    Finance expense                 (1,781)     (2,809)     (1,702)     (2,026)
    Net income (loss) and
    comprehensive income (loss)  $  (4,260)   $   (274)  $ (10,410)  $      18
    Net income (loss) per share
    Basic and Diluted            $   (0.03)   $   0.00   $   (0.07)  $   (0.00)

                                        BNK Petroleum Inc.
                                        Third Quarter 2012
                                      ($000 except as noted)

                                                 3rd Quarter         First Nine Months
                                                 2012      2011       2012      2011
    Oil revenue before royalties             $  2,170     3,396      6,703     7,591
    Gas revenue before royalties                  902     1,720      2,592     4,072
    NGL revenue before royalties                1,783     2,930      5,547     7,536
    Oil and Gas revenue                         4,855     8,046     14,842    19,199
    Cash Flow provided (used) by 
    operating activities                       (1,799)    1,270    (10,495)      374
    Capital Expenditures                      (12,746)  (11,436)   (36,104)  (23,180)
    Proceeds from Loans and Borrowings          4,200         0      8,200         0
    Cash Proceeds of Stock Options 
    and Warrants                                    0       192         63       621
                                                 3rd Quarter         First Nine Months
                                                 2012      2011       2012      2011
    Average natural gas production (mcf/d)      3,816     4,564      3,894     3,598
    Average NGL production (Boepd)                649       675        637       597
    Average Oil production (Bopd)                 262       432        261       306
    Average production (Boepd)                  1,547     1,868      1,547     1,503
    Average natural gas price ($/mcf)           $2.57     $4.10      $2.43     $4.15
    Average NGL price ($/bbl)                   29.85    $47.15      31.80    $46.25
    Average oil price ($/bbl)                   90.03    $85.46      93.63    $90.74
    Average price per barrel                   $34.11    $46.81     $35.01    $46.79
    Royalties per barrel                         6.40      8.78       6.57      8.77
    Operating expenses per barrel                9.94      9.76      10.73     10.46
    Netback per barrel                         $17.77    $28.27     $17.71    $27.56

The information outlined above is extracted from and should be read in conjunction with the Company's unaudited financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and the related management's discussion and analysis thereof, copies of which are available under the Company's profile at

Non-IFRS Information

Netback per barrel and its components are calculated by dividing revenue, royalties and operating expenses by the Company's sales volume during the period.  Netback per barrel is a non-IFRS measure but it is commonly used by oil and gas companies to illustrate the unit contribution of each barrel produced.  This is a useful measure for investors to compare the performance of one entity with another.  The non-IFRS measures referred to above do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.

The Company also uses the "barrels" (bbls) or "barrels of oil equivalent" (boe) reference in this report to reflect natural gas liquids and oil production and sales.  All boe conversions are derived by converting gas to oil in the ratio of six thousand cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil, representing the approximate energy equivalency.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this news release constitute "forward-looking information" as such term is used in applicable Canadian securities laws, including information regarding the proposed timing and expected results of exploratory work including the potential for oil production from the Lower Caney and upper Sycamore formations on the Company's Oklahoma acreage and possible impact of that on the Company's netbacks and resources base, anticipated timing of commencement of drilling, well-deepening, fracture-stimulations, and concession applications.  Forward-looking information is based on plans and estimates of management at the date the information is provided and certain factors and assumptions of management, including that the Company's geologic models will be validated, that previous exploration results are indicative of future results and success, that discoveries will prove to be economic, that all required permits and approvals, funding from co-venturers and the necessary labor and equipment will be obtained, provided or available, as applicable, when required. Forward looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause plans, estimates, timing and actual results to vary materially from those projected in such forward-looking information.  Factors that could cause the forward-looking information in this news release to change or to be inaccurate include, but are not limited to, the risk that permits, approvals, equipment and/or funding are delayed or available only on terms that are not acceptable to the Company, political and currency risks and other risks associated with exploration and development of oil and gas projects, including those set forth in the Company's management's discussion and analysis and annual information form filed under the Company's profile on

About BNK Petroleum Inc.

BNK Petroleum Inc. is an international oil and gas exploration and production company focused on finding and exploiting large, predominately unconventional oil and gas resource plays. Through various affiliates and subsidiaries, the Company owns and operates shale gas properties and concessions in the United States, Poland, Germany and Spain. Additionally the Company is utilizing its technical and operational expertise to identify and acquire additional unconventional projects outside of North America. The Company's shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the stock symbol BKX.

For further information, contact:

Wolf E. Regener, President and Chief Executive Officer +1 (805) 484-3613

Email: [email protected]


More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi’s VP Business Development and Engineering, explored the IoT cloud-based platform technologies driving this change including privacy controls, data transparency and integration of real time context with p...
I recently attended and was a speaker at the 4th International Internet of @ThingsExpo at the Santa Clara Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to attend this event last year and I wrote a blog from that show talking about how the “Enterprise Impact of IoT” was a key theme of last year’s show. I was curious to see if the same theme would still resonate 365 days later and what, if any, changes I would see in the content presented.
Cloud computing delivers on-demand resources that provide businesses with flexibility and cost-savings. The challenge in moving workloads to the cloud has been the cost and complexity of ensuring the initial and ongoing security and regulatory (PCI, HIPAA, FFIEC) compliance across private and public clouds. Manual security compliance is slow, prone to human error, and represents over 50% of the cost of managing cloud applications. Determining how to automate cloud security compliance is critical to maintaining positive ROI. Raxak Protect is an automated security compliance SaaS platform and ma...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data shows "less than 10 percent of IoT developers are making enough to support a reasonably sized team....
Just over a week ago I received a long and loud sustained applause for a presentation I delivered at this year’s Cloud Expo in Santa Clara. I was extremely pleased with the turnout and had some very good conversations with many of the attendees. Over the next few days I had many more meaningful conversations and was not only happy with the results but also learned a few new things. Here is everything I learned in those three days distilled into three short points.
DevOps is about increasing efficiency, but nothing is more inefficient than building the same application twice. However, this is a routine occurrence with enterprise applications that need both a rich desktop web interface and strong mobile support. With recent technological advances from Isomorphic Software and others, rich desktop and tuned mobile experiences can now be created with a single codebase – without compromising functionality, performance or usability. In his session at DevOps Summit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, demonstrated examples of com...
As organizations realize the scope of the Internet of Things, gaining key insights from Big Data, through the use of advanced analytics, becomes crucial. However, IoT also creates the need for petabyte scale storage of data from millions of devices. A new type of Storage is required which seamlessly integrates robust data analytics with massive scale. These storage systems will act as “smart systems” provide in-place analytics that speed discovery and enable businesses to quickly derive meaningful and actionable insights. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Paul Turner, Chief Marketing Officer at...
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bruce Swann, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Campaign, explored the key ingredients of cross-channel marketing in a digital world. Learn how the Adobe Marketing Cloud can help marketers embrace opportunities for personalized, relevant and real-time customer engagement across offline (direct mail, point of sale, call center) and digital (email, website, SMS, mobile apps, social networks, connected objects).
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, exploreed the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends and technology requirements that will drive the Internet of Things from hype to reality.
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessions, I wanted to share some of my observations on emerging trends. As cyber security serves as a fou...
We all know that data growth is exploding and storage budgets are shrinking. Instead of showing you charts on about how much data there is, in his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Scott Cleland, Senior Director of Product Marketing at HGST, showed how to capture all of your data in one place. After you have your data under control, you can then analyze it in one place, saving time and resources.
With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now all corporate assets – people, objects, and spaces – can share information about themselves and thei...
The cloud. Like a comic book superhero, there seems to be no problem it can’t fix or cost it can’t slash. Yet making the transition is not always easy and production environments are still largely on premise. Taking some practical and sensible steps to reduce risk can also help provide a basis for a successful cloud transition. A plethora of surveys from the likes of IDG and Gartner show that more than 70 percent of enterprises have deployed at least one or more cloud application or workload. Yet a closer inspection at the data reveals less than half of these cloud projects involve production...
Continuous processes around the development and deployment of applications are both impacted by -- and a benefit to -- the Internet of Things trend. To help better understand the relationship between DevOps and a plethora of new end-devices and data please welcome Gary Gruver, consultant, author and a former IT executive who has led many large-scale IT transformation projects, and John Jeremiah, Technology Evangelist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), on Twitter at @j_jeremiah. The discussion is moderated by me, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true change and transformation possible.
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" in this scenario: microservice A (releases daily) depends on a couple of additions to backend B (re...
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
Container technology is shaping the future of DevOps and it’s also changing the way organizations think about application development. With the rise of mobile applications in the enterprise, businesses are abandoning year-long development cycles and embracing technologies that enable rapid development and continuous deployment of apps. In his session at DevOps Summit, Kurt Collins, Developer Evangelist at, examined how Docker has evolved into a highly effective tool for application delivery by allowing increasingly popular Mobile Backend-as-a-Service (mBaaS) platforms to quickly crea...