Welcome!

.NET Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, ChandraShekar Dattatreya, Trevor Parsons, Peter Silva

News Feed Item

ProAssurance Reports Third Quarter 2012 Results

BIRMINGHAM, Ala., Nov. 6, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- ProAssurance Corporation (NYSE:PRA) reports Net Income of $60.1 million, or $1.94 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2012. Operating Income for the third quarter was $52.9 million, or $1.71 per diluted share. Gross Premiums Written were $156.5 million in the third quarter of 2012. At September 30, 2012, Book Value per share was $76.47 and Shareholders' Equity was $2.3 billion.

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20081024/PROASSURANCELOGO )

Unaudited Consolidated Financial Summary (in thousands)


Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,



2012

2011

2012

2011


Gross Premiums Written

$ 156,547

$ 174,680

$ 429,223

$ 450,795


Net Premiums Written

$ 147,809

$ 164,798

$ 397,676

$ 421,692


Net Premiums Earned

$ 127,125

$ 134,627

$ 395,050

$ 403,766


Net Investment Income

$ 33,910

$ 34,116

$ 101,912

$ 106,573


Equity in Earnings (Loss) of
     Unconsolidated Subsidiaries

$    211

$ (2,264)

$ (4,082)

$ (6,044)


Net Investment Result

$ 34,121

$ 31,852

$ 97,830

$ 100,529


Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)

$ 13,219

$ (11,972)

$ 22,348

$ (5,648)


Other Income

$  1,529

$  7,471

$  5,207

$ 11,745


Total Revenues

$ 175,994

$ 161,978

$ 520,435

$ 510,392


Net Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

$ 56,621

$ 63,176

$ 174,904

$ 197,951


Underwriting, Policy Acquisition
     and Operating Expenses

$ 33,280

$ 34,954

$ 103,083

$ 103,534


Interest Expense

$    350

$    932

$  2,002

$  2,645


Loss on extinguishment of debt

$  2,163

$      –

$  2,163

$      –


Total Expenses

$ 92,414

$ 99,062

$ 282,152

$ 304,130


Tax Expense

$ 23,474

$ 19,211

$ 64,079

$ 59,768


Net Income

$ 60,106

$ 43,705

$ 174,204

$ 146,494


Operating Income

$ 52,946

$ 48,366

$ 160,630

$ 147,007


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

$ 28,651

$ 53,366

$ 61,356

$ 106,418


 

Earnings per Share


Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,


2012

2011

2012

2011

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding (in 000's)





    Basic

30,674

30,557

30,641

30,577

    Diluted

30,938

30,847

30,902

30,844

Net Income per share (Basic)

$   1.96

$   1.43

$   5.69

$   4.79

Net Income per share (Diluted)

$   1.94

$   1.42

$   5.64

$   4.75

Operating Income per share (Diluted)

$   1.71

$   1.57

$   5.20

$   4.77

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures   
Operating Income is a "Non-GAAP" financial measure that is widely used in our industry to evaluate the performance of underwriting operations. Operating Income excludes the after-tax net effects of confidential settlements, the effects of Net Realized Investment (Gains) Losses, Debt Retirement (Gain) or Loss, and Guaranty Fund (Recoupments) Assessments. We believe it presents a useful view of the performance of our insurance operations.

While we believe disclosure of certain Non-GAAP information is appropriate, you should not consider this information without also considering the information we present in accordance with GAAP, which includes the net effect of confidential settlements, Net Realized Investment (Gains) Losses, Debt Retirement (Gain) or Loss, and Guaranty Fund (Recoupments) Assessments during the periods presented below. The following table reconciles Net Income to Operating Income.

Reconciliation of Net Income to Operating Income (in thousands, except per share data)


Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,



2012

2011

2012

2011


Net Income

$ 60,106

$ 43,705

$ 174,204

$ 146,494


Items Excluded in the Calculation
of Operating Income:






(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt

$  2,163

$      –

$  2,163

$      –


Net Realized Investment (Gains) Losses

$ (13,219)

$ 11,972

$ (22,348)

$  5,648


Guaranty Fund (Recoupments) Assessments

$     41

$     99

$     16

$     41


Effect of Confidential Settlements (Net)

$      –

$ (4,900)

$   (714)

$ (4,900)


Pre-Tax Effect of Exclusions

$ (11,015)

$  7,171

$ (20,883)

$    789


Tax Effect at 35%

$  3,855

$ (2,510)

$  7,309

$   (276)


Operating Income

$ 52,946

$ 48,366

$ 160,630

$ 147,007


Per Diluted Common Share:






  Net Income

$   1.94

$   1.42

$   5.64

$   4.75


  Effect of Adjustments

$ (0.23)

$   0.15

$  (0.44)

$   0.02


Operating Income Per Diluted Common Share

$   1.71

$   1.57

$   5.20

$   4.77


 

Key Ratios


Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,


2012

2011

2012

2011

Current Accident Year Loss Ratio

83.9%

85.6%

84.1%

84.3%

Effect of Prior Accident Years'
Reserve Development

(39.4%)

(38.7%)

(39.8%)

(35.3%)

Net Loss Ratio

44.5%

46.9%

44.3%

49.0%

Expense Ratio

26.0%

25.8%

25.8%

25.2%

Combined Ratio

70.5%

72.7%

70.1%

74.2%

Operating Ratio

43.8%

47.4%

44.3%

47.8%

Return on Equity

10.4%

8.8%

10.3%

10.1%

Return on Equity is calculated by dividing annualized Net Income for the period by the average of beginning and ending Shareholders' Equity.


Management Commentary  
"We continue to focus on accepting and writing business that meets our risk and pricing goals. While this may affect top-line growth in the current market, in the end it best serves the long-term interests of our shareholders and policyholders. We are producing strong results through the disciplined execution of a long-term strategy that allows us to succeed in a historically volatile line of business. We combine a strict focus on profitable underwriting with a dedication to efficient, effective delivery of new products and unparalleled service to our policyholders and agents, allowing us to enhance the strength of our balance sheet while delivering meaningful value for our shareholders," said W. Stancil Starnes, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ProAssurance. He added, "We are confident in our ability to deliver on the promise of Treated Fairly, now and in the future, because of our unique combination of operational discipline, financial strength and wide experience in a broad range of healthcare delivery settings."

Business Detail

  • Third quarter 2012 Gross Premiums Written were $157 million, a 10% decrease compared to the year-ago quarter; third quarter Net Premiums Earned were $127 million, a 6% decline over the year-ago quarter. The competitive marketplace, the effect of prior years' improved loss trends and the normal renewal pattern of our two-year policies reduced our top line, but we are committed to writing only that business that meets our pricing objectives. For the first nine months of 2012, Gross Premiums Written were $429 million, a year-over-year decrease of 5%. Net Premiums Earned for the first nine months of 2012 were $395 million, down 2% over the prior year's nine-month period.
  • Premium retention for our standard physician business was 89% in 2012's third quarter, unchanged from the same period a year ago. Through the first nine months of 2012, premium retention in our standard physician business was 90%, a one point improvement year-over-year.
  • Average renewal pricing on our physician medical professional liability book was 2% higher than expiring premium, comparing the third quarter of 2012 to the third quarter a year ago. This is partially due to higher rates in our podiatric line of business, where renewals are concentrated in the third quarter. Comparing the first nine months of 2012 to the first nine months of 2011, average renewal pricing on our physician medical professional liability book was higher by 1%.
  • We recognized $50 million in net favorable loss reserve development in the third quarter of 2012, compared to $52 million in the same period a year ago. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net favorable loss reserve development was $158 million, compared to $142 million in 2011. This net favorable development continues to come primarily from accident years 2004 to 2010 and is significantly attributable to loss severity that has proven to be lower than previously expected. The decline in claims frequency we, and the industry, experienced from 2004 to 2010 has generally not resulted in higher average loss payments (i.e., increasing severity), despite expectations to the contrary. Management is now assuming the moderate severity trend to be more sustainable and thus is giving it more credibility in the more recent accident years even though these accident years are not as fully developed. However, given the long-tailed nature of our claims, we continue to be mindful of the potential for severity to increase when recognizing favorable development in accident years that are not mature.

Investment Commentary

  • In the third quarter of 2012, our Net Investment Result (Net Investment Income plus Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries) was $34 million, a 7% increase from the same period a year ago. In the third quarter, average yields on fixed income investment balances were marginally higher than in 2011. Additionally, we did see higher earnings from our interests in certain limited partnerships and lower amortization of our tax credit partnership investments. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our Net Investment Result was $98 million, down 3% compared to the same period in 2011.
  • Net Investment Income was $34 million in the third quarter of 2012, essentially unchanged from a year ago. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Net Investment Income was $102 million, a 4% decline from the same period in the prior year. Our average tax equivalent income yield for both the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 4.5%, compared with 4.4% in third quarter 2011 and 4.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
  • The CUSIP-level disclosure of our investment holdings as of September 30, 2012 is available under Supplemental Investor Information in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.ProAssurance.com.

 

Balance Sheet Highlights (in thousands, except per share data)


September 30, 2012

December 31, 2011

Shareholders' Equity

$ 2,349,398

$ 2,164,453

Total Investments

$ 4,125,634

$ 4,090,541

Total Assets

$ 4,972,666

$ 4,998,878

Policy Liabilities

$ 2,497,256

$ 2,580,966

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

$ 158,936

$ 130,037

Goodwill

$ 159,625

$ 159,625

Book Value per Share

$ 76.47

$ 70.84

 

Capital Management

  • In the third quarter of 2012 we completed the repayment of all of our long-term debt. The debt retirement used $53 million of funds previously authorized by our Board for the repurchase of stock and retirement of debt. This leaves us with $135 million available in that Board authorization. As part of the debt retirement, we recognized a loss of $2.2 million in the third quarter.
  • Our Board approved quarterly cash dividends of $0.25 per common share, paid in April, July and October of 2012. Please see the Investor Relations section of our website, www.ProAssurance.com, for a comprehensive history of our dividend payments.

Transaction Updates

  • Documents have been mailed to Medmarc policyholders to provide details on the announced transaction that would demutualize Medmarc and bring it into ProAssurance. Regulatory hearings are scheduled for November 8, 2012, followed by a special meeting of eligible members on December 4, 2012. If the transaction is approved by regulators and eligible members of Medmarc, we expect to close the transaction effective January 1, 2013. Medmarc is one of the nation's leading underwriters of products liability insurance for medical technology and life sciences, and also underwrites a book of legal professional liability (LPL) insurance. The transaction will expand our core insurance offerings and position us to better respond to diverse needs in healthcare liability, while the legal professional business is an important addition to our expanding LPL book.
  • Subscribers of Independent Nevada Physicians Insurance Exchange (IND) have approved a transaction that would bring IND into ProAssurance and make ProAssurance the leading writer of medical professional liability insurance in Nevada. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approval, and hearings are scheduled for November 27, 2012, with a projected closing date shortly thereafter.

About ProAssurance   
ProAssurance Corporation is the nation's largest independently traded specialty writer of medical professional liability insurance. ProAssurance is recognized as one of the top performing insurance companies in America by virtue of our inclusion in the Ward's 50 for the past six years. ProAssurance is rated "A" (Strong) by Fitch Ratings; ProAssurance Group is rated "A" (Excellent) by A.M. Best.

Conference Call Information

  • Live: Wednesday, November 7, 2012, 10:00 AM ET. Investors may dial (800) 723-6498 (toll free) or (785) 830-7989. The call will also be webcast on our website, www.ProAssurance.com, and on StreetEvents.com.
  • Replay: By telephone, through November 17, 2012, at (888) 203-1112 or (719) 457-0820, using access code 4431653. The replay will also be available on our website, www.ProAssurance.com, and on StreetEvents.com, through at least November 30, 2012.
  • Podcast: A replay, and other information about ProAssurance, is available on a free subscription basis through a link on the ProAssurance website or through Apple's iTunes.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements  
Statements in this news release that are not historical fact or that convey our view of future business, events or trends are specifically identified as forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon our estimates and anticipation of future events and highlight certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from our expected results. We expressly claim the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any forward-looking statements in this news release. Forward-looking statements represent our outlook only as of the date of this news release. Except as required by law or regulation, we do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Forward-looking statements are generally identified by words such as, but not limited to, "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "hope," "hopeful," "intend," "may," "optimistic," "potential," "preliminary," "project," "should," "will," and other analogous expressions. When we address topics such as liquidity and capital requirements, the value of our investments, return on equity, financial ratios, net income, premiums, losses and loss reserves, premium rates and retention of current business, competition and market conditions, the expansion of product lines, the development or acquisition of business in new geographical areas, the availability of acceptable reinsurance, actions by regulators and rating agencies, court actions, legislative actions, payment or performance of obligations under indebtedness, payment of dividends, and other similar matters, we are making forward-looking statements.

Risks that could adversely affect the proposed mergers of Medmarc Insurance Group (Medmarc) and Independent Nevada Doctors Insurance Exchange (IND) into ProAssurance include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • the businesses of ProAssurance and Medmarc or ProAssurance and IND may not be combined successfully, or such combination may take longer to accomplish than expected;
  • the cost savings from either transaction may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;
  • operating costs, customer loss and business disruption following either or both transactions, including adverse effects on relationships with employees, may be greater than expected;
  • governmental approvals of either or both transactions may not be obtained or adverse regulatory conditions may be imposed in connection with governmental approvals of either or both transactions;
  • there may be restrictions on our ability to achieve continued growth through expansion into other states or through acquisitions or business combinations;
  • the board of directors of Medmarc or the Subscriber Advisory Committee (SAC) of IND may withdraw their recommendation in favor of a competing acquisition proposal; and
  • those policyholders eligible to vote on the proposed Medmarc transaction may fail to approve it.

The following important factors are among those that could affect the actual outcome of other future events:

  • the expected benefits from completed and proposed acquisitions may not be achieved or may be delayed longer than expected due to business disruption, loss of customers, employees and key agents, increased operating costs or inability to achieve cost savings, and assumption of greater than expected liabilities, among other reasons;
  • general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are different than
  • anticipated;
  • our ability to maintain our dividend payments;
  • regulatory, legislative and judicial actions or decisions that could affect our business plans or operations;
  • the enactment or repeal of tort reforms;
  • formation or dissolution of state-sponsored medical professional liability insurance entities that could remove or add sizable groups of physicians from or to the private insurance market;
  • the impact of deflation or inflation;
  • changes in the interest rate environment;
  • changes in U.S. laws or government regulations regarding financial markets or market activity that may affect the U.S. economy and our business;
  • changes in the ability of the U.S. government to meet its obligations that may affect the U.S. economy and our business;
  • performance of financial markets affecting the fair value of our investments or making it difficult to determine the value of our investments;
  • changes in accounting policies and practices that may be adopted by our regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
  • changes in laws or government regulations affecting medical professional liability insurance or the financial community;
  • the effects of changes in the healthcare delivery system, including, but not limited to, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;
  • consolidation of healthcare providers and entities that are more likely to self insure and not purchase medical professional liability insurance;
  • uncertainties inherent in the estimate of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves and reinsurance, and changes in the availability, cost, quality, or collectability of insurance/reinsurance;
  • our ability to achieve continued growth through expansion into other states or through acquisitions or business combinations;
  • the results of litigation, including pre- or post-trial motions, trials and/or appeals we undertake;
  • an allegation of bad faith which may arise from our handling of any particular claim, including failure to settle;
  • loss of independent agents;
  • changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans;
  • our ability to retain and recruit senior management;
  • our ability to purchase reinsurance and collect recoveries from our reinsurers;
  • assessments from guaranty funds;
  • our ability to achieve continued growth through expansion into other states or through
  • acquisitions or business combinations;
  • changes to the ratings assigned by rating agencies to our insurance subsidiaries, individually or as a group;
  • provisions in our charter documents, Delaware law and state insurance law may impede attempts to replace or remove management or attempts to initiate a takeover;
  • state insurance restrictions may prohibit assets held by our insurance subsidiaries, including cash and investment securities, from being used for general corporate purposes;
  • taxing authorities can take exception to our tax positions and cause us to incur significant amounts of defense costs and, if our defense is not successful, additional tax costs, including interest and penalties; and
  • insurance market conditions may alter the effectiveness of our current business strategy and affect our revenues.

Additional risk factors that may cause outcomes that differ from our expectations or projections are described in various documents filed by ProAssurance Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as current reports on Form 8K, and regular reports on Forms 10Q and 10K, particularly in "Item 1A, Risk Factors."

SOURCE ProAssurance Corporation

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.