Click here to close now.


Microsoft Cloud Authors: Jordan Sanders, Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Keith Mayer, Jayaram Krishnaswamy

Related Topics: PowerBuilder, Microsoft Cloud

PowerBuilder: Article

A Snap-In App Framework Using Dynamic PowerBuilder Assemblies (Part 2)

Part 2: A PowerBuilder .NET use case implementation

This two-part series examines and contrasts PowerBuilder .NET 12.5.1's new dynamic assembly feature with corresponding dynamic library functionality in PowerBuilder Classic. The discourse is presented in the context of a simplified yet practical use case. Part 1 presented the use case, reviewed pertinent PowerBuilder Classic dynamic APIs and presented a Classic PBD implementation. Part 2 introduces PowerBuilder .NET 12.5.1's Dynamic Assembly feature, reveals relevant PowerBuilder .NET generated assembly internals, and presents a PowerBuilder .NET use case implementation. Along the way it explores PowerBuilder assembly internals.

My initial attack plan when exploring version 12.5.1's dynamic assembly function capabilities was to envision a use case where library functions are used to reflect on an assembly to discover its contents and then extract and instantiate class definitions. I am so used to writing dynamic Classic PowerScript code using Library functions to get lists of objects in a PBD and dynamically creating them that I naively assumed that the .NET Library methods were equivalent to their Classic counterparts. Wrong! As you'll soon see, my journey took me spelunking deep into the cavities of PowerBuilder .NET assemblies. Lucky for me I got the treasure at the bottom of the cave and was able find my way back out. Read on!

PowerScript Dynamic Assembly API
In the .NET world, a PBLX is the file-based equivalent of a PBL that you access under the control of the PowerBuilder library API. Just like the PBL, a PBLX has a library directory with managed access to the directory's contents. Pertinent to our discussion, the functions CreateLibrary, DeleteLibrary, LibraryDirectory, LibraryDirectoryEx, LibraryImport and LibraryExport all work as advertised in their Classic form when called in .NET. The sole difference is that they operate on a PBLX or its contents.

Remember that in Classic, a PBD is basically a PBL sans source code. In addition to their important role as runtime libraries, you can add PBDs to an application library list, and create or inherit from their code objects as if they were inside PBLs. The nice thing about runtime libraries in Classic is that with proper forethought you can turn any library on your library list into a standalone PBD that you can use within any application.

Things are a bit different in the .NET world where the PBD has gone the way of the wooly mammoth. There is no such thing as PBD generation nor are PBDs reference-able on a .NET application. The replacement technology is the PowerBuilder .NET Assembly.

To generate a standalone PB .NET Assembly use the IDE to create a PB Assembly Target to which you add the libraries containing code objects you want in your Assembly. Use the Project painter to generate the target's contents as a freestanding DLL. However, since the libraries are generated as DLLs you cannot add them to your library list. You must add them as referenced assemblies on your PowerBuilder application. Once reference-able, you can create or inherit from their code objects just as if they were inside your PBLs.

As mentioned, a PBLX is the file-based equivalent of a PBL; both are accessed by the IDE under the control of the PowerBuilder library API. However, since a PowerBuilder .NET Assembly has no structural relationship to a PBD, the Classic PBL/PBD-centric library functions AddToLibraryList, SetLibraryList and GetLibrary are obsolete in .NET. Sadly for those migrating a Classic application containing these functions, there are no migration or PBCS compiler warning messages; the functions just do nothing at runtime. Worse yet was that there was no functional replacement in the PowerBuilder .NET world; that is until the release of version 12.5.1. This version brings relief to those whose applications rely on adding classes at runtime. Three PowerBuilder Assembly oriented replacement functions were added: AddAssemblyReference, SetAssemblyReference and GetAssemblyReference. These functions are operationally equivalent to their Classic counterparts with the exception that they operate on PowerBuilder assemblies instead of PowerBuilder dynamic libraries. Once a PowerBuilder Assembly is added to the assembly reference list, its contents are fully available to the runtime. Any global function, PowerObject type class or DataWindow object can be created or referenced in code. Of course, since the code objects are not present at build time, you will need to create them using one of the dynamic open or Create methods I illustrated in the first article in this series.

The Missing Link
Table 1 shows differences and similarities between Classic and Dot Net Library Functions.

Table 1: Library function comparison chart

Classic Function

Classic Purpose

.NET Function & Variations


Adds files to the library search path of the application

AddAssemblyReference( )


Gets the files in the library search path of the application

GetAssemblyReference( )


Create a library and add comments to it

Creates a PBL folder*


Delete a library

Deletes the PBL folder *


Returns a list containing all the objects of a specified type in BOTH PBL & PBD

Only works for PBLX

Doesn't work on Assy!!



Returns a list containing all the objects in a library in BOTH PBL & PBD

Only works for PBLX

Doesn't work on Assy!!


Exports an object -from- a specified PBL to a string

Works for PBLX


Imports an object -into- a specified PBL from a string

Works for PBLX


Changes the files in the library search path of the application

SetAssemblyReference( )

Note that there is just one omission: LibraryDirectory and LibraryDirectoryEx are not implemented to return the contents of a referenced PowerBuilder assembly. Similar to AddToLibraryList a call to LibraryDirectoryEx does not generate a compiler warning and does not return a runtime response. Unfortunately for us, runtime Assembly directory functionality is a crucial aspect of our snap-in loader architecture. What to do?

Into the Cave: PowerBuilder Assembly Internals
At this point, I realized that I would have to write my own PowerBuilder Assembly directory functionality. Lucky for us PowerBuilder .NET is a CLR compliant language; I had a full arsenal of .NET 4.0 Framework classes and the strength of the great .NET disassembly tool, Red Gate Software's .NET Reflector. What I needed to do was generate a PowerBuilder Assembly with all kinds of things inside it, use Reflector to learn where things were put and how they were structured, and then use .NET Reflection API calls to get a directory of them at runtime. Once I had the directory of names, I'd let PowerBuilder .NET do its standard magic to dynamically create them at runtime.

I created a PowerBuilder .NET Assembly with everything in it but the kitchen sink (Figure 1 shows my all-time favorite ice cream sundae: Jahn's Kitchen Sink. It could satisfy six hungry kids!). Figure 2 shows the Solution Explorer view of my assembly. It has a function, structure, DataWindow object, menu, CVUO, SCUO, Window and a .NET enumeration. I also added an image file with a Build Action of ‘Embedded Resource.' My plan was to plunge into the assembly's bowels, locate my classes and write code to dynamically build a directory listing of their names that I could present in my UI.

Figure 1: Kitchen Sink Ice Cream Sundae

Figure 2: Shared Assembly

I built a PowerBuilder assembly from my target and used Reflector to examine the assembly structure. Figure 3 show the contents of the disassembled assembly's default namespace. For the screenshot I aligned its generated .NET classes next to their PowerScript Explorer view counterparts. Notice that for each PowerScript Class there is a correspondingly named .NET class prefixed by C__. These C__ classes are the .NET implementation classes. There is also a class named PBGlobalDefinitions_sharedobjects (the target name prefixed by PBGlobalDefinitions_). A look inside this class as shown in Figure 4 reveals that it is a wrapper for the PowerScript class identifiers declared to be of their corresponding C__ class types. This class lists some of the members of our PowerBuilder runtime assembly, but where are the DataWindow Objects?

Figure 3: External vs. internal assembly view

Figure 4: External vs internal Global Type view

A little more poking around with Reflector revealed their location. Figure 5 shows that the engineers tucked DataWindow Object syntax in a local folder named Resources, together with WPF XAML and embedded assembly resources.

Figure 5: DataWindow location

Building the Plumbing
Armed with the knowledge I gained using Reflector about where the global type names were stored, I was able to use methods from the.NET Reflection API to write code to extract global type names from the PowerBuilder assembly. Listing 1 shows the code I wrote to populate a drop down selection list

Listing 1: Extracting Class Names
Assembly myAssembly   //some declarations
System.@Type  types [ ], atype
FieldInfo pbfields[], pbfield
myAssembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(lpath)   //lpath holds the folder/file name of
integer i_upper, x, i_innerctr, y
types = myAssembly.GetExportedTypes() // Get an array of the types in the assembly
for x = 1 to types.Length   //iterate the array looking for ‘our man'
atype = Types[x]
if Left (atype.FullName,20) = 'PBGlobalDefinitions_' then //if are you're "PBGlobalDefinitions_" let's look inside you
pbfields=atype.GetFields( )
for y=1 to pbfields.Length
pbfield=pbfields[y]     //add the global ref name to the DDLB
if not pbfield.IsStatic then ddlb_visuals.AddItem(pbfield.Name) 
end if

Writing code to extract the DataWindow object names was an interesting challenge. It turns out that sharedobjects.g.resources stored in the Resources folder is a collection object. Using some code examples I found on the web as my guide I was able to write the code shown in Listing 2 to populate a dropdown listbox with the DataWindow object names.

Listing 2: Extracting DataWindow names
System.Resources.ResourceReader _rreader
System.Collections.IDictionaryEnumerator _enum
string sResource         
long lrow
_rreader =        Create System.Resources.ResourceReader (myassembly.GetManifestResourceStream("sharedobjects.g.resources"))
_enum = _rreader.GetEnumerator()
do while _enum.MoveNext ( )
sResource = _enum.Key.ToString()
if Right(sResource,4)='.srd' then                    //we got a dwo name!
sResource=Left(sResource, Len(sResource) - 4)
end if
catch (System.Exception e)
MessageBox('woops', e.Message)
end try

The sum total of these two code listings is roughly equivalent to the Classic LibraryDirectory( ) function. Although we are now much richer for the experience, I can't help but think, "Gee whiz wouldn't it have been good if the product engineers would have provided AssemblyDirectory( )functionality?"

An Example: Putting It Together
For my .NET snap-in API I took a decidedly .NET approach. Rather than providing common ancestors and implementing an inheritance-based approach, I decided to provide a common interface that each snap-in class would implement as a kind of marker that indicated the developer had done due diligence in conforming to the interface. In this simple example I only gave the interface one function; in a production application the interface would define many more functions all of which would need to be implemented to fulfill the snap-in contract. Using an interface-based approach allows a snap-in developer to choose class ancestry from among a range of choices. I put my interface in a separate PowerBuilder assembly target that I built and added as a reference to both the snap-in and dynamic loader targets. Figure 6 shows my SnapCommon assembly.

Figure 6: SnapCommon assembly

Listing 3: Testing the interface
ClassDefinition cdo
PowerObject lpo
int rc
lpo = create using  ddlb_visuals.Text  //create the object non-visually
cdo = po.ClassDefinition       
try  //check if the object implements the snappable interface
rc = lpo.dynamic init_snap( 5 )  //all snap-ins must implement this method
catch (RuntimeError r )           //if the method ain't there, it ain't a legal snap-in
MessageBox('Interface Error', 'Snap-In does not implement the i_snappable interface')
rc = -1
destroy lpo
end try
if rc=-1 then return

To determine if the selected snap-in is value, we create the object non-visually and try to call the method define in the interface. If the method isn't there, we'll catch the runtime exception, show a message and quit. If the method is there (we have a valid snap-in), we'll use PowerBuilder reflection to determine its type and then create it using its type correct open function; Listing 3 shows that code. Please note that PowerBuilder reflection was not enhanced to report on .NET types, therefore we cannot use the ClassDefinition object to determine if an interface is implemented by a class. It is possible to use .NET reflection as shown in Figure 7 to determine if an interface is implemented. To do so we'd have to get the implementation class and then reflect inside of it using the PowerBuilder mangled names. However, because it is less code and a ‘pure' PowerScript approach, we chose to take a dynamic approach. Listing 4 shows the Choose Case decision block for opening a class based on its type.

Listing 4: Choose Case decision block
String mytype
mytype = cdo.DataTypeOf
choose case mytype
case 'userobject'
rc = parent.openuserobject( uo, ddlb_visuals.Text, 10, 10)
if rc = -1 then
parent.Title='Open User Object Failed'
parent.Title='Open User Object Succeeded ' + string(rc)
end if
if IsNull(rc) then parent.Title='Open User Object Returned NULL ' + ddlb_visuals.Text
case 'window'
Window w
Open( w, ddlb_visuals.Text)
case 'datastore'
n_ds lds
lds = create using ddlb_visuals.Text
lds.dynamic of_load( sqlca )
end choose

Incidentally, creating DataWindows required the most trivial coding. Listing 5 shows the three lines of code.

Listing 5: Displaying a DataWindow
dw_dwos.dataobject = ddlb_dwos.Text
dw_dwos.SetTransObject( sqlca )
dw_dwos.Retrieve( )

Figure 7: .NET Interface location

Suggestions for Improvement: Most Needed & Nice to Have PowerScript Features
First, the ability to declare namespaces and put PowerScript classes into them is one of the useful .NET CLR language features added to PowerBuilder. Open( ) functions support namespaces when they are statically hardcoded. For example Open(elearnIT.w_testwindow) compiles and operates properly. However, my experiments revealed that the language does not support using namespaces in dynamic Open functions and Create Using statements. For example both Open(lWindow, "elearnIT.w_testwindow") and Open(lWindow, "elearnIT_w_testwindow") fail. This lack of support could be a major impediment for enterprise vendors who would likely instruct their independent software vendors to put their third-party assemblies into a customer-specific namespace in order to guarantee name uniqueness in a multi-vendor application snap-in environment.

Second, even though I wrote code to show how one might get directory listings of an assembly's contents, having native functions such as AssemblyDirectory and AssemblyDirectoryEx would be helpful.

Third, it would be useful to extend the PowerBuilder reflection API to report on .NET types present in a PowerBuilder class.

Fourth, it would be useful to be able to statically reflect on a PowerBuilder Class without having to create it first as a PowerObject.

With a good understanding of PowerScript and .NET reflection, coupled with knowledge of polymorphic coding techniques, a developer can design and implement dynamic and creative solutions to expand the usefulness of their enterprise applications.

Long Live PowerBuilder!

More Stories By Yakov Werde

Yakov Werde, a 25 year IT industry veteran, is a member of TeamSybase and the newly formed Sybase Customer Evangelist Team. Yakov is a recognized author, speaker and trainer who has been designing and delivering PowerBuilder, .NET, EaServer, Web App Development, and Java training for over 14 years to corporate, military and government developers. Prior to discovering his aptitude as an educator, Yakov worked as an architect, project manager and application coder in the trenches of application software development. Yakov holds a Masters in Education with a specialty in instructional design for online learning from Capella University and a BS in math and computer science from Florida International University. Yakov, managing partner of eLearnIT LLC (, authors and delivers workshops and web based eLearning tutorials to guide professional developers toward PowerBuilder Classic and .NET mastery. Follow Yakov on Twitter as @eLearnPB

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

@ThingsExpo Stories
I recently attended and was a speaker at the 4th International Internet of @ThingsExpo at the Santa Clara Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to attend this event last year and I wrote a blog from that show talking about how the “Enterprise Impact of IoT” was a key theme of last year’s show. I was curious to see if the same theme would still resonate 365 days later and what, if any, changes I would see in the content presented.
Cloud computing delivers on-demand resources that provide businesses with flexibility and cost-savings. The challenge in moving workloads to the cloud has been the cost and complexity of ensuring the initial and ongoing security and regulatory (PCI, HIPAA, FFIEC) compliance across private and public clouds. Manual security compliance is slow, prone to human error, and represents over 50% of the cost of managing cloud applications. Determining how to automate cloud security compliance is critical to maintaining positive ROI. Raxak Protect is an automated security compliance SaaS platform and ma...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data shows "less than 10 percent of IoT developers are making enough to support a reasonably sized team....
Just over a week ago I received a long and loud sustained applause for a presentation I delivered at this year’s Cloud Expo in Santa Clara. I was extremely pleased with the turnout and had some very good conversations with many of the attendees. Over the next few days I had many more meaningful conversations and was not only happy with the results but also learned a few new things. Here is everything I learned in those three days distilled into three short points.
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York and Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place Nov 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 17th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound cha...
DevOps is about increasing efficiency, but nothing is more inefficient than building the same application twice. However, this is a routine occurrence with enterprise applications that need both a rich desktop web interface and strong mobile support. With recent technological advances from Isomorphic Software and others, rich desktop and tuned mobile experiences can now be created with a single codebase – without compromising functionality, performance or usability. In his session at DevOps Summit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, demonstrated examples of com...
As organizations realize the scope of the Internet of Things, gaining key insights from Big Data, through the use of advanced analytics, becomes crucial. However, IoT also creates the need for petabyte scale storage of data from millions of devices. A new type of Storage is required which seamlessly integrates robust data analytics with massive scale. These storage systems will act as “smart systems” provide in-place analytics that speed discovery and enable businesses to quickly derive meaningful and actionable insights. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Paul Turner, Chief Marketing Officer at...
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bruce Swann, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Campaign, explored the key ingredients of cross-channel marketing in a digital world. Learn how the Adobe Marketing Cloud can help marketers embrace opportunities for personalized, relevant and real-time customer engagement across offline (direct mail, point of sale, call center) and digital (email, website, SMS, mobile apps, social networks, connected objects).
We all know that data growth is exploding and storage budgets are shrinking. Instead of showing you charts on about how much data there is, in his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Scott Cleland, Senior Director of Product Marketing at HGST, showed how to capture all of your data in one place. After you have your data under control, you can then analyze it in one place, saving time and resources.
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, exploreed the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends and technology requirements that will drive the Internet of Things from hype to reality.
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessions, I wanted to share some of my observations on emerging trends. As cyber security serves as a fou...
With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now all corporate assets – people, objects, and spaces – can share information about themselves and thei...
Continuous processes around the development and deployment of applications are both impacted by -- and a benefit to -- the Internet of Things trend. To help better understand the relationship between DevOps and a plethora of new end-devices and data please welcome Gary Gruver, consultant, author and a former IT executive who has led many large-scale IT transformation projects, and John Jeremiah, Technology Evangelist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), on Twitter at @j_jeremiah. The discussion is moderated by me, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true change and transformation possible.
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" in this scenario: microservice A (releases daily) depends on a couple of additions to backend B (re...
The cloud. Like a comic book superhero, there seems to be no problem it can’t fix or cost it can’t slash. Yet making the transition is not always easy and production environments are still largely on premise. Taking some practical and sensible steps to reduce risk can also help provide a basis for a successful cloud transition. A plethora of surveys from the likes of IDG and Gartner show that more than 70 percent of enterprises have deployed at least one or more cloud application or workload. Yet a closer inspection at the data reveals less than half of these cloud projects involve production...
Growth hacking is common for startups to make unheard-of progress in building their business. Career Hacks can help Geek Girls and those who support them (yes, that's you too, Dad!) to excel in this typically male-dominated world. Get ready to learn the facts: Is there a bias against women in the tech / developer communities? Why are women 50% of the workforce, but hold only 24% of the STEM or IT positions? Some beginnings of what to do about it! In her Day 2 Keynote at 17th Cloud Expo, Sandy Carter, IBM General Manager Cloud Ecosystem and Developers, and a Social Business Evangelist, wil...