Click here to close now.


Microsoft Cloud Authors: Jordan Sanders, Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Keith Mayer, Jayaram Krishnaswamy

News Feed Item

Capital Power Files Business Acquisition Report

Report Includes Second Quarter Financial Results and Updated Outlook

EDMONTON, Sept. 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - Capital Power Corporation (Capital Power, or the Company) (TSX:CPX) today announced the filing of a Business Acquisition Report (BAR) in connection with its acquisition of substantially all of the power generation assets previously owned by EPCOR Utilities Inc. The report includes Capital Power's 2009 second quarter and six month financial results and an updated outlook. A copy of the BAR is available on the company's website at or on SEDAR at

As described in Capital Power's prospectus dated June 25, 2009 (the Prospectus) in connection with the Company's Initial Public Offering (IPO), consideration for the acquisition of the Company's assets consisted of approximately $1,364 million in cash and 56.625 million exchangeable limited partnership units of Capital Power L.P. (CPLP), representing a 72.2% partnership interest in CPLP. The acquisition was effective July 1, 2009.

While the acquisition was not completed until the third quarter of Capital Power's fiscal year, the BAR includes pro forma consolidated financial information for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009. For the purpose of the pro forma consolidated statements of income, the pro forma consolidated statements of income in the BAR presents the effects of the completion of the IPO and related reorganization as if they had been completed on January 1, 2008.

    Operational and Financial     Three months ended       Six months ended
     Highlights(1) (unaudited)          June 30                 June 30
    (millions of dollars)           2009        2008        2009        2008
    Electricity generation (GWh)   3,492       2,875       7,160       6,230
    Generation plant
     availability (%)                93%         84%         95%         89%
    Revenues                        $537        $686      $1,246      $1,319
    Gross margin(2)                 $250        $247        $449        $483
    Adjusted EBITDA(2)              $148        $149        $265        $302
    Funds from operations(2)         $28         $49        $109        $119
    Historical net income (loss)      $2        $(18)        $56         $17
    Pro forma net income(3)          $11         n/a         $30         n/a

    (1) The operational and financial highlights in this press release are
        derived from and should be read in conjunction with the financial
        statements and other information contained in the BAR.
    (2) Gross margin, adjusted Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
        and amortization (EBITDA), and Funds from operations are non-GAAP
        financial measures and do not have standardized meanings under GAAP,
        and therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures used by
        other enterprises. Reconciliations to these non-GAAP financial
        measures to net income in the case of gross margin and adjusted
        EBITDA, and cash provided by operating activities in the case of
        funds from operations are included at the end of this press release.
    (3) Adjusted for IPO-related changes to capital structure, fair value and
        public company costs as detailed in Note 3 to the Unaudited Pro Forma
        Financial Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended
        June 30, 2009 contained in the BAR.

"Our second quarter results reflect weak power prices in the Alberta market, which are a function of low natural gas prices and strong availability of power generation units in the province," said Brian Vaasjo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Power. "Alberta power prices averaged $32 per megawatt hour in the second quarter of 2009 compared with $108 per megawatt hour in 2008. This underlines the importance of our strategic focus to maintain a balance of contracted and merchant facilities."

Despite the weak pricing environment, Capital Power's year-over-year performance in the second quarter with respect to gross margin and adjusted EBITDA was essentially flat. This reflected a number of positive and negative variances, as described in the BAR report. Notable among these was a decline from the year earlier period in the contribution from the Company's Alberta commercial plants, while the contribution from contracted facilities and the EPCOR Power L.P. (EPLP) increased.


Alberta forward power prices declined in the first half of 2009 and are expected to remain low in the near term, mainly due to low natural gas prices. Consistent with the second quarter results, lower power prices are expected to reduce adjusted EBITDA, excluding fair value adjustments, and cash flow from operations for the remainder of 2009, as approximately 53% of the Company's Alberta commercial portfolio is exposed to the spot market. The remaining 47% has been sold forward at an average price in the mid-$60/MWh range. The Alberta commercial plants represent approximately 40% to 50% of adjusted EBITDA, before unrealized fair value changes, excluding the non-controlling interest in EPLP.

For 2010, approximately 80% of the Alberta commercial portfolio position has been sold forward at an average price in the mid-$60/MWh range, which should reduce the exposure to decreases in power prices. For 2011, the Alberta commercial portfolio's open position is expected to increase to approximately 60% to 65% of the total portfolio, which could introduce more variability in adjusted EBITDA and cash flow, depending on changes in power prices. The average contracted price is in the low $70/MWh range for the generation sold forward in 2011. The Company will continue to monitor commodity price forecast movements and undertake transactions to optimize the portfolio and limit exposure to price movements.

The sensitivity to an increase/decrease of $1/MWh in the Alberta power price, assuming all other factors are held constant, is estimated to be an adjusted EBITDA increase/decrease of approximately $1 million for the remainder of 2009, $1 million for 2010 and $4 million for 2011. The increased sensitivity in 2011 is due to the open position on the Keephills 3 facility and the expiration of certain Alberta wholesale and commercial and industrial customer contracts.

The Company also outlined in the "Outlook" section of the BAR various factors that are expected to impact its results for the remainder of 2009 and for 2010.

"Looking forward, Capital Power has a strong balance sheet, a modern and efficient fleet, a diversified portfolio of assets, long-term contracts including power purchase arrangements, and an investment-grade credit rating," added Mr. Vaasjo. "This represents an ideal foundation from which to expand our current operating platform and participate in the recovery of natural gas and power prices."

Webcast of Analyst Conference Call

Capital Power will be hosting a conference call with analysts on September 17, 2009 at 9:00 am (MDT) to discuss the BAR. Interested parties may access the live webcast on the Company's website at An archive of the webcast will be available on the website.

    About Capital Power

Capital Power is a growth-oriented North American independent power producer, building on more than a century of innovation and reliable performance. The Company's vision is to be recognized as one of North America's most respected, reliable and competitive power generators. Headquartered in Edmonton, Alberta, Capital Power has interests in 31 facilities in Canada and the U.S. totaling approximately 3,300 megawatts of generation capacity. Capital Power and its subsidiaries develop, acquire and optimize power generation from a wide range of energy sources.

    Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements, including "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities laws, as it relates to anticipated financial performance, events and strategies. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding: (i) expected lower power prices and the impact for the remainder of 2009; (ii) anticipated reduction in exposure to decreases in power prices in 2010; (iii) expected increase in the Alberta commercial portfolio position in 2011 and its effect on operating results; (iv) the Company's intention to monitor commodity price forecast movements and take action to optimize the portfolio and limit exposure; (v) estimated sensitivity of a change in power prices for the final six months of 2009, 2010 and 2011; and (v) factors that form the foundation from which the Company may expand its operating platform.

These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors it believes are appropriate. The material factors and assumptions used to develop these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) the operation of the Company's facilities; (ii) power plant availability, including those subject to acquired PPAs (iii) the Company's financial position and credit facilities (iv) the Company's assessment of commodity and power markets; (v) the Company's assessment of the markets and regulatory environments in which it operates; (vi) weather; (vii) availability and cost of labour and management resources; (viii) performance of contractors and suppliers; (ix) availability and cost of financing; * foreign exchange rates; (xi) management's analysis of applicable tax legislation; (xii) the currently applicable and proposed tax laws will not change and will be implemented; (xiii) currently applicable and proposed environmental regulations will be implemented; (xiv) counterparties will perform their obligations; (xv) renewal and terms of PPAs (xvi) ability to successfully integrate and realize benefits of its acquisitions (xvii) ability to implement strategic initiatives which will yield the expected benefits; and (xviii) the Company's assessment of capital markets and ability to complete future share offerings.

Whether actual results, performance or achievements will conform to the Company's expectations and predictions is subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results and experience to differ materially from the Company's expectations. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to risks relating to: (i) operation of the Company's facilities (ii) power plant availability and performance; (iii) unanticipated maintenance and other expenditures; (iv) availability and price of energy commodities; (v) electricity load settlement; (vi) regulatory and government decisions including changes to environmental, financial reporting and tax legislation; (vii) weather and economic conditions; (viii) competitive pressures; (ix) construction; * availability and cost of financing; (xi) foreign exchange; (xii) availability and cost of labour, equipment and management resources; (xiii) performance of counterparties, partners, contractors and suppliers in fulfilling their obligations to the Company; (xiv) developments in the North American capital markets; (xv) compliance with financial covenants; (xvi) ability to successfully realize the benefits of acquisitions and investments; (xvii) the tax attributes of and implications of any acquisitions; and (xviii) other factors and assumptions discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors in the Prospectus and in other documents filed with provincial securities commissions in Canada. If any such risks actually occur, they could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In that case the trading price of the Company's common shares could decline, perhaps materially. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of providing information about management's current expectations, and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in the Company's expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based, except as required by law.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The Company uses (i) gross margin, (ii) adjusted EBITDA, (iii) funds from operations, and (iv) funds from operations excluding non-controlling interests in EPLP as financial performance measures. These terms are not defined financial measures according to Canadian GAAP and do not have standardized meanings prescribed by GAAP, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures used by other enterprises. These measures should not be considered an alternative to net earnings, cash flow from operating activities or other measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with Canadian GAAP. Rather, these measures are provided as additional information to complement those Canadian GAAP measures by providing further understanding of the Company's results of operations from management's perspective.

    Gross margin and adjusted EBITDA
    Capital Power uses gross margin and adjusted EBITDA to measure the
operating performance of plants and groups of plants from period to period. A
reconciliation of gross margin and adjusted EBITDA to net income is as

                                          Three months         Six months
    (unaudited, $ millions)               ended June 30       ended June 30
                                      ------------------- -------------------
                                         2009      2008      2009      2008
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Revenues.........................  $   537   $   686   $ 1,246   $ 1,319
      Energy purchases and fuel......      287       439       797       836
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Gross margin.....................      250       247       449       483
      Deduct (add):
      Operations, maintenance, and
       administration................      102        98       184       181
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Adjusted EBITDA..................      148       149       265       302
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
      Deduct (add):
      Depreciation, amortization, and
       asset retirement accretion....       43        46        89        91
      Foreign exchange losses (gains)        2        (3)        2        10
      Gain on sale of power purchase
       arrangement and related
       transactions..................        -         -       (30)      (34)
      Net financing expenses.........       63        50       127       101
      Income taxes...................        7         6        12        11
      Non-controlling interests......       31        68         9       106
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Net income (loss)................  $     2   $   (18)  $    56   $    17
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------

    Funds from operations and funds from operations excluding non-controlling
    interests in EPLP
    Capital Power uses funds from operations to measure the Company's ability
to generate funds from current operations and measures its interest in cash
flows by excluding the non-controlling interest in EPLP's cash flows. A
reconciliation of funds from operations and funds from operations excluding
non-controlling interests in EPLP to cash provided by operating activities is
as follows:

                                          Three months         Six months
    (unaudited, $ millions)               ended June 30       ended June 30
                                      ------------------- -------------------
                                         2009      2008      2009      2008
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Funds from operations excluding
     non-controlling interests
     in EPLP.........................  $     2   $    33   $    64   $    77
      Funds from operations due to
       non-controlling interests
       in EPLP.......................       26        16        45        42
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Funds from operations............       28        49       109       119
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
      Change in non-cash operating
       working capital...............       34        (7)      (20)      (10)
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
    Cash provided by operating
     activities......................  $    62   $    42   $    89   $   109
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------
                                      --------- --------- --------- ---------

    Changes in working capital are primarily made up of intercompany payables
and receivables between the Company and EPCOR and are not representative of
how working capital would be managed by the Company on a stand-alone basis.
Therefore, the Company uses funds from operations as its primary operating
cash flow measure.

                                                            Three      Six
    (unaudited, $ millions)                                 months    months
                                                          --------- ---------
    Funds from operations for the periods
     ended June 30, 2008                                   $    49   $   119
    Higher Genesee PPA availability incentive income.....       27        42
    Higher adjusted EBITDA from EPLP.....................       11         2
    Lower Genesee 1,2 and 3 maintenance expenses.........       16        26
    Lower (higher) current income taxes..................       (2)        8
    Higher financing expenses............................      (13)      (26)
    Lower adjusted EBITDA from other portfolio activities       (8)       (2)
    Higher administration expense, excluding EPLP........      (19)      (22)
    Lower Alberta commercial plants electricity margin...      (21)      (25)
    Other................................................      (12)      (13)
                                                          --------- ---------
    (Decrease)                                                 (21)      (10)
                                                          --------- ---------
    Funds from operations for the periods ended
     June 30, 2009                                         $    28   $   109

SOURCE Capital Power Corporation

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" in this scenario: microservice A (releases daily) depends on a couple of additions to backend B (re...
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
Container technology is shaping the future of DevOps and it’s also changing the way organizations think about application development. With the rise of mobile applications in the enterprise, businesses are abandoning year-long development cycles and embracing technologies that enable rapid development and continuous deployment of apps. In his session at DevOps Summit, Kurt Collins, Developer Evangelist at, examined how Docker has evolved into a highly effective tool for application delivery by allowing increasingly popular Mobile Backend-as-a-Service (mBaaS) platforms to quickly crea...
Growth hacking is common for startups to make unheard-of progress in building their business. Career Hacks can help Geek Girls and those who support them (yes, that's you too, Dad!) to excel in this typically male-dominated world. Get ready to learn the facts: Is there a bias against women in the tech / developer communities? Why are women 50% of the workforce, but hold only 24% of the STEM or IT positions? Some beginnings of what to do about it! In her Day 2 Keynote at 17th Cloud Expo, Sandy Carter, IBM General Manager Cloud Ecosystem and Developers, and a Social Business Evangelist, wil...
PubNub has announced the release of BLOCKS, a set of customizable microservices that give developers a simple way to add code and deploy features for realtime apps.PubNub BLOCKS executes business logic directly on the data streaming through PubNub’s network without splitting it off to an intermediary server controlled by the customer. This revolutionary approach streamlines app development, reduces endpoint-to-endpoint latency, and allows apps to better leverage the enormous scalability of PubNub’s Data Stream Network.
Apps and devices shouldn't stop working when there's limited or no network connectivity. Learn how to bring data stored in a cloud database to the edge of the network (and back again) whenever an Internet connection is available. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Ben Perlmutter, a Sales Engineer with IBM Cloudant, demonstrated techniques for replicating cloud databases with devices in order to build offline-first mobile or Internet of Things (IoT) apps that can provide a better, faster user experience, both offline and online. The focus of this talk was on IBM Cloudant, Apache CouchDB, and ...
I recently attended and was a speaker at the 4th International Internet of @ThingsExpo at the Santa Clara Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to attend this event last year and I wrote a blog from that show talking about how the “Enterprise Impact of IoT” was a key theme of last year’s show. I was curious to see if the same theme would still resonate 365 days later and what, if any, changes I would see in the content presented.
Cloud computing delivers on-demand resources that provide businesses with flexibility and cost-savings. The challenge in moving workloads to the cloud has been the cost and complexity of ensuring the initial and ongoing security and regulatory (PCI, HIPAA, FFIEC) compliance across private and public clouds. Manual security compliance is slow, prone to human error, and represents over 50% of the cost of managing cloud applications. Determining how to automate cloud security compliance is critical to maintaining positive ROI. Raxak Protect is an automated security compliance SaaS platform and ma...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data shows "less than 10 percent of IoT developers are making enough to support a reasonably sized team....
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York and Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place Nov 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 17th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound cha...
Just over a week ago I received a long and loud sustained applause for a presentation I delivered at this year’s Cloud Expo in Santa Clara. I was extremely pleased with the turnout and had some very good conversations with many of the attendees. Over the next few days I had many more meaningful conversations and was not only happy with the results but also learned a few new things. Here is everything I learned in those three days distilled into three short points.
DevOps is about increasing efficiency, but nothing is more inefficient than building the same application twice. However, this is a routine occurrence with enterprise applications that need both a rich desktop web interface and strong mobile support. With recent technological advances from Isomorphic Software and others, rich desktop and tuned mobile experiences can now be created with a single codebase – without compromising functionality, performance or usability. In his session at DevOps Summit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, demonstrated examples of com...
As organizations realize the scope of the Internet of Things, gaining key insights from Big Data, through the use of advanced analytics, becomes crucial. However, IoT also creates the need for petabyte scale storage of data from millions of devices. A new type of Storage is required which seamlessly integrates robust data analytics with massive scale. These storage systems will act as “smart systems” provide in-place analytics that speed discovery and enable businesses to quickly derive meaningful and actionable insights. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Paul Turner, Chief Marketing Officer at...
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bruce Swann, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Campaign, explored the key ingredients of cross-channel marketing in a digital world. Learn how the Adobe Marketing Cloud can help marketers embrace opportunities for personalized, relevant and real-time customer engagement across offline (direct mail, point of sale, call center) and digital (email, website, SMS, mobile apps, social networks, connected objects).
We all know that data growth is exploding and storage budgets are shrinking. Instead of showing you charts on about how much data there is, in his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Scott Cleland, Senior Director of Product Marketing at HGST, showed how to capture all of your data in one place. After you have your data under control, you can then analyze it in one place, saving time and resources.
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessions, I wanted to share some of my observations on emerging trends. As cyber security serves as a fou...
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, exploreed the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends and technology requirements that will drive the Internet of Things from hype to reality.
With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now all corporate assets – people, objects, and spaces – can share information about themselves and thei...
Continuous processes around the development and deployment of applications are both impacted by -- and a benefit to -- the Internet of Things trend. To help better understand the relationship between DevOps and a plethora of new end-devices and data please welcome Gary Gruver, consultant, author and a former IT executive who has led many large-scale IT transformation projects, and John Jeremiah, Technology Evangelist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), on Twitter at @j_jeremiah. The discussion is moderated by me, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.